• Adams GB, Balfour DL, Reed GE (2006) Abu Ghraib, administrative evil, and moral inversion: The value of “putting cruelty first”. Public Adm Rev 66:680-693.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Allendoerfer MG, Murdie A, Welch RM (2020) The path of the boomerang: Human rights campaigns, third-party pressure, and human rights. Int Stud Q 64:111-119.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Amnesty International (2023) Torture.https://www.amnesty.org/en/what-we-do/torture/. Accessed 10 July 2023.

• Arnon D, Haschke P, Park B (2023) The right accounting of wrongs: Examining temporal changes to human rights monitoring and reporting. BJPoIS 53:163-182.

  Google Scholar 

• Arrigo JM, Bennett R (2007). Organizational supports for abusive interrogations in the “War on Terror”. PAC 13:411-421.

  Google Scholar 

• Arsenault EG, Chiang C (2020) The U.S. Department of Defense and its torture program. Armed Forces Soc 46:191-213.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Barnes J (2017) A genealogy of the torture taboo. Routledge, New York.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Basoglu M (ed) (2017) Torture and its definition in international law: An interdisciplinary approach. Oxford, New York.

• Beger A, Hill D (2019) Examining repressive and oppressive state violence using the Ill-Treatment and Torture data. Confl Manag Peace Sci 36:626-644.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Berlin MS (2021) Does criminalizing torture deter police torture? Am J Pol Sci, online first.

• Blakeley R (2007) Why torture? Rev Int Stud 33:373-394.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bohara AK, Mitchell NJ, Nepal M, Raheem N (2008) Human rights violations, corruption, and the policy of repression. Policy Stud 36:1-18.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bueno de Mesquita B, Downs GW, Smith A, Cherif FM (2005) Thinking inside the box: A closer look at democracy and human rights. Int Stud Q 49:439-457.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Carver R, Handley L (2016) Does torture prevention work? University of Liverpool Press, Liverpool.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Carver R, Handley L (2020) Evaluating National Preventive Mechanisms: A conceptual model. J Hum Rights Prac 12:387-408.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Celermajer D (2018) The prevention of torture: An ecological approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Chandler D (2000) Voices from S-21: Terror and history in Pol Pot’s secret prison. University of California Press, Berkeley.

  Google Scholar 

• Cheesman N (2022). Torture in Thailand at the limits of law. Law Soc Inq, online first: 1-26.

• Chilton AS, Versteeg M (2015) The failure of constitutional torture prohibitions. J Leg Stud 44:417-52.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cingranelli DL, Filippov M (2018) Are human rights practices improving? Am Polit Sci Rev 112: 1083-1089.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cingranelli DL, Richards DL (2010). The Cingranelli and Richards (CIRI) Human Rights Data Project. Hum Rights Q 32:401-424.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cingranelli D, Mark S, Gibney M, Haschke P, Wood R, Arnon D (2019) Human rights violations and violent internal conflict. Soc Sci 8:41.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Clark AM (2018) Laws, talk, and human rights: The impact of treaty ratification, UN criticism, and democratic change on torture. J Hum Rights 17:18-435.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Clark AM, Sikkink K (2013) Information effects and human rights data: Is the good news about increased human rights information bad news for human rights measures? Hum Rights Q 35:539-568.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Clark AM, Sikkink K (2016) Response to David L Richards. Hum Rights Q 38:493-496.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cole WM (2012). Human rights as myth and ceremony? Reevaluating the effectiveness of human rights treaties, 1981-2007. Am J Sociol 117:1131-1171.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cole WM (2015) Mind the gap: State capacity and the implementation of human rights treaties. Int Organ 69:405-441.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cole WM (2016) Managing to mitigate abuse: Bureaucracy, democracy, and human rights, 1984 to 2010. Int J Comp Sociol 57:69-97.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cole WM, Ramirez FO (2013) Conditional decoupling: Assessing the impact of national human rights institutions, 1981 to 2004. Am Sociol Rev 78:702-725.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Collard M (2019) Torture as state crime: A criminological analysis of the transnational institutional torturer. Routledge, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Conrad CR (2014) Divergent incentives for dictators: Domestic institutions and (international promises not to) torture. J Conflict Resolut 58:34-67.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Conrad CR, DeMeritt JHR (2014) Unintended consequences: The effect of advocacy to end torture on empowerment rights violations. In: Lightcap T, Pfiffner JP (eds) Examining torture: Empirical studies of state repression. Palgrave MacMillan, New York, pp 159-183.

  Google Scholar 

• Conrad CR, Haglund J, Moore WH (2014) Torture allegations as events data: Introducing the Ill-Treatment and Torture (ITT) dataset. J Peace Res 51:429-438.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Conrad CR, Hill DW, Moore WH (2018) Torture and the limits of democratic institutions. J Peace Res 55:3-17.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Conrad CR, Moore WH (2010). What stops the torture? Am J Pol Sci 54:459-476.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Conrad CR, Ritter EH (2013) Treaties, tenure, and torture: The conflicting domestic effects of international law. J Polit 75:397-409.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Creamer CD, Simmons BA (2019) Do self-reporting regimes matter? Evidence from the Convention Against Torture. Int Stud Q 63:1051-1064.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Crelinsten RD (2003) The world of torture: A constructed reality. Theor Criminol 7(3):293-318.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• d’Ambruoso WL (2015) Norms, perverse effects, and torture. International Theory 7:33-60.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• d’Ambruoso WL (2022) American torture from the Philippines to Iraq: A recurring nightmare. Oxford, New York.

• Davenport C (2007) State repression and political order. Ann Rev Polit Sci 10:1-23.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Davenport C (2020) Introducing DyoRep: A database of perpetrator-victim dyads within repressive spells. J Hum Rights 19:117-137.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• DeMeritt JHR, Conrad CR (2019) Repression substitution: Shifting human rights violations in response to UN naming and shaming. Civ Wars 21:128-152.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• DiBlasi L (2020) From shame to new name: How naming and shaming creates pro-government militias. Int Stud Q 64:906-918.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dreher A, Gassebner M, Siemers LH (2010) Does terrorism threaten human rights? Evidence from panel data. J Law Econ 53:65-93.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Drohan B (2017) Brutality in an age of human rights: Activism and counterinsurgency at the end of the British empire. Cornell, Ithaca, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Du Bois L (1990) Torture and the construction of an enemy: The example of Argentina 1976-1983. Dialect Anthropol 15:317-328.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Eck C, Fariss CJ (2018) Ill-treatment and torture in Sweden: A critique of cross-case comparisons. Hum Rights Q 40:591-604.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Einolf CJ (2007) The fall and rise of torture: A comparative historical analysis. Sociol Theor 25:101-121.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Einolf CJ (2014) America in the Philippines, 1899-1902: The first torture scandal. Palgrave-Macmillan, New York.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Einolf CJ (2021) How torturers are made: Evidence from Saddam Hussein’s Iraq. J Hum Rights 20:381-395.

• Einolf, CJ (2022) How torture fails: Evidence of misinformation from torture-induced confessions in Iraq. J Glob Secur Stud 7(1).

• Evans MD, Modvig J (eds) (2020). Research handbook on torture: Legal and medical perspectives on prohibition and prevention. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.

  Google Scholar 

• Fariss CJ (2014) Respect for human rights has improved over time: Modeling the changing standard of accountability. Am Polit Sci Rev 108:297–318.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fariss CJ (2018) The changing standard of accountability and the positive relationship between human rights treaty ratification and compliance. Brit J Polit Sci 48:239-271.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fariss CJ, Dancy G (2017) Measuring the impact of human rights: Conceptual and methodological debates. Annu Rev Law Soc Sci 13:273-94.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Farrell M (2020) The ticking bomb scenario: Evaluating torture as an interrogation method. In: Evans MJ, Modvig J (eds), Research handbook on torture: Legal and medical perspectives on prohibition and prevention. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.

  Google Scholar 

• Gilligan MJ, Nesbitt NH (2009) Do norms reduce torture? J Leg Stud 38:445-470.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Goodare J (2016) The European witch-hunt. Routledge, New York.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Gregory S, Timerman D (1986) Rituals of the modern state: The case of torture in Argentina. Dialect Anthropol 11:63-71.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hafner-Burton EM (2008) Sticks and stones: Naming and shaming the human rights problem. Int Organ 62:689-716.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hafner-Burton E (2013) Making human rights a reality. Princeton University Press.

• Hafner-Burton EM, Ron J (2009) Seeing double. World Polit 61:360-401.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hafner-Burton EM, Tsutsui K (2005) Human rights in a globalizing world: The paradox of empty promises. Am J Sociol 110:1373–1411.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hafner-Burton EM, Tsutsui K (2007) Justice lost! The failure of international human rights law to matter where needed most. J Peace Res 44:407-425.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hajjar L (2008) Sovereign bodies, sovereign states and the problem of torture. In: Falk R, Elver H, Hajjar L (eds) Human rights: Critical concepts in political science, volume II, pp 228-261. Routledge, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Haritos-Fatouros M (2003) The psychological origins of institutionalized torture. Routledge, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Haschke P (2018) Human rights in democracies. Routledge, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Haschke P, Arnon D (2020) What bias? Changing standards, information effects, and human rights measurement. J Hum Rights 19:33-45.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hassner RE (2020) What do we know about interrogational torture? International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence 33:4-42.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hathaway OA (2002). Do human rights treaties make a difference? Yale Law J 111:1935–2042.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hatz S (2021) What shapes public support for torture, and among whom? Hum Rights Q 43:683-698.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hendrix C, Wong WH (2013) When is the pen truly mighty? Regime type and the efficacy of naming and shaming in curbing human rights abuses. Br J Polit Sci 43:651-672.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Heurich SJ, Vaughn MS (2009) Ill-treatment and torture at Abu Ghraib prison: Irrational policy implementation and administrative breakdown. Crim Justice Stud 22:181-201.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hill DW (2010) Estimating the effects of human rights treaties on state behavior. J Polit 72:1161–74.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hill DW, Jones ZM (2014) An empirical evaluation of explanations for state repression. Am Polit Sci Rev 108:661-687.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hollyer JR, Rosendorff P (2011) Domestic politics and the accession of authoritarian regimes to human rights treaties. Q J Polit Sci 6:275–327.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Houck SC, Repke MA (2017) When and why we torture: A review of psychology research. Transl Issues Psychol Sci 3:272-283.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Huggins MK (2002). State violence in Brazil: The professional morality of torturers. In: Rotker S (ed) Citizens of fear: Urban violence in Latin America, Rutgers Princeton, New Jersey, pp 141-151.

  Google Scholar 

• Huggins MK (2005) Torture 101: Lessons from the Brazilian case. J Third World Stud 22:161-173.

  Google Scholar 

• Huggins MK (2012) State torture: Interviewing perpetrators, discovering facilitators, theorizing cross-nationally – proposing “Torture 101”. State Crime J 1:45-69.

  Google Scholar 

• Huggins MK, Haritos-Fatouros M, Zimbardo PG (2002) Violence workers: Police torturers and murderers reconstruct Brazilian atrocities. University of California, Berkeley.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Jackson JL, Hall SL, Hill DW (2018). Democracy and police violence. Res Politics 5:1-8.

  Google Scholar 

• Jones ZM, Lupu Y (2018) Is there more violence in the middle? Am J Pol Sci, 62:652-667.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kahn-Nisser S (2021) For better or worse: Shaming, faming, and human rights abuse. J Peace Res 58:479-493.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kanavou AA, Path K (2017) The lingering effects of thought reform: The Khmer Rouge S-21 personnel. J Asian Stud 76(1): 87-105.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kearns EM, Young JK (2020) Torture logic: Why some Americans support the use of torture in counterterrorism. Columbia University Press, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Keith LC (2002) Constitutional provisions for individual human rights (1977-1996): Are they more than mere “window dressing?” Polit Res Q 55:111-143.

  Google Scholar 

• Keith LC, Tate CN, Poe SC (2009) Is the law a mere parchment barrier to human rights abuse? J Polit 71:644–60.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kelly T (2011) This side of silence: Human rights, torture, and the recognition of cruelty. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

  Google Scholar 

• Kelly T (2019). The struggle against torture: Challenges, assumptions and new directions. J Hum Rights Prac 11:324-333.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kenny PD (2010). The meaning of torture. Polity 42: 131-155.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kraft RN (2014) Violent accounts: Understanding the psychology of perpetrators through South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission. New York University Press, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Krommendijk, J (2015) The domestic effectiveness of international human rights monitoring in established democracies: The case of UN human Rights treaty bodies. Rev Int Organ 10:489-512.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Laguardia F (2017) Deterring torture: The preventive power of criminal law and its promise for inhibiting state abuses. Hum Rights Q 39:189-212.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Leo R (2009) Police interrogation and American justice. Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  Google Scholar 

• McCoy AW (2012) Torture and impunity: The U.S. doctrine of coercive interrogation. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.

  Google Scholar 

• Midlefort HCE (1972) Witch hunting in southwestern Germany, 1562-1684: The social and intellectual foundations. Stanford, Berkeley, California.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Miles SH (2020) The torture doctors: Human rights crimes and the road to justice. Georgetown University, Washington, DC.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Milgram S (1973) Obedience to authority: An experimental view. Harper and Row, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Miller P, Gronke P, Rejali D (2014) Torture and public opinion: The partisan dimension. In: Lightcap T, Pfiffner JP (eds), Examinng torture: Empirical studies of state repression. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Moore WH (2010) Incarceration, interrogation, and counterterror: Do (liberal) democratic institutions constrain Leviathan? PS: Polit Sci Polit 43:421-424.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Murdie AM, Davis DR (2012). Shaming and blaming: Using events data to assess the impact of human rights INGOs. Int Stud Q 56:1–16.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Neumayer E (2005) Do international human rights treaties improve respect for human rights? J Conflict Resolut 49:925–53.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Newbery S (2016) Interrogation, intelligence and security: Controversial British techniques. Manchester University Press, Manchester UK.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Nowak M (2018). Torture: An expert’s confrontation with an everyday evil. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.

  Google Scholar 

• Nowak M, Birk M, Molina G (eds) (2019) The United Nations Convention Against Torture and its Optional Protocol: A commentary, second edition. Oxford, New York.

• Osiel MJ (2001) Constructing subversion in Argentina’s Dirty War. Representations 75:119-158.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Parry J (2010) Understanding torture: Law, violence, and political identity. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Piazza JA (2017). Repression and terrorism: A cross-national empirical analysis of types of repression and domestic terrorism. Terror Polit Violence 29:102-118.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Piazza JA, Walsh JI (2009) Transnational terror and human rights. Int Stud Q 53:125-148.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rejali D (2007) Torture and democracy. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

  Google Scholar 

• Rejali D (2020) The field of torture today: Ten years on from Torture and democracy. In: Barela SJ, Fallon M, Gaggioli G, Ohlin JD (eds), Interrogation and torture: Integrating efficacy with law and morality. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 71-108.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Reyes-Quilodran C, Cottam M (2018) Explaining torture: A case study. Int J of Criminol 7:206-223.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Richardot S (2014). “You know what to do with them”: The formulation of orders and engagement in war crimes. Aggress Violent Behav 19:83-90.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Richards DL (2016) The myth of information effects in human rights data: Response to Ann Marie Clark and Katherine Sikkink, Hum Rights Q 38:477-492.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Richards DL, Webb A, Clay KC (2015) Respect for physical-integrity rights in the twenty-first century: Evaluating Poe and Tate’s model 20 years later. J Hum Rights 14:291-311.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rubin MA, Morgan RK (2021) Terrorism and the varieties of civil liberties. J Glob Secur Stud 6(3).

• Shapiro D (2003) The tortured, not the torturers, are ashamed. Soc Res 70:1131-1148.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sharma M, Massagé I, McDonald K (2012) Lawyers’ intervention at pretrial stage helps to prevent torture, illegal detention and other human rights violations: Experiences of Advocacy Forum – Nepal. J Hum Rights Prac 4:253-272.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sigvardsdotter E, Marjan Vaez A, Hedman R, and Saboonchi F (2016) Prevalence of torture and other war-related traumatic events in forced migrants: A systematic review. Torture J 26:41-73.

  Google Scholar 

• Simmons BA (2009) Mobilizing for human rights: International law in domestic politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Suh CS (2019) More than words: Professional legal activism and the prevention of torture in South Korea. Hum Rights Q 41:646-671.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Taussig M (1984) Culture of terror – space of death. Roger Casement’s Putumayo Report and the explanation of torture. Comp Stud in Soc and His 26:467-497.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Taylor F (2020) The torture machine: Racism and police violence in Chicago. Haymarket, Chicago.

  Google Scholar 

• Thomson M, Bernath B (2020). Preventing torture: What works? In: Barela SJ, Fallon M, Gaggioli G, Ohlin JD (eds) Interrogation and torture. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 471-492.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• United Nations General Assembly (1984) Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. United Nations Treaty Series 1465:85.

  Google Scholar 

• United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (2023) Global Appeal 2023.https://reporting.unhcr.org/globalappeal. Accessed 10 July 2023.

• Viola L (2017) Stalinist perpetrators on trial: Scenes from the great terror in Soviet Ukraine. Oxford University Press, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Von Staden A (2022) The conditional effectiveness of soft law: Compliance with the decisions of the Committee Against Torture. Hum Rights Rev 23:451-478.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wahl R (2017) Just violence: Torture and human rights in the eyes of the police. Stanford, California.

  Google Scholar 

• Walsh, J. I., and Piazza, J. A. (2010). Why respecting physical integrity rights reduces terrorism. Comp Polit Stud 43(5), 551-577.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Welch R (2017) National Human Rights Institutions: Domestic implementation of international human rights law. J Hum Rights 16:96-116.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wolfendale J (2020) The making of a torturer. In: Knittel SC, Goldberg ZJ (eds) The Routledge international handbook of perpetrator studies. Routledge, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Wood RM, Gibney M (2010) The Political Terror Scale (PTS): A re-introduction and a comparison to CIRI. Hum Rights Q 32:367-400.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wu W, Vander Beken T, Police torture in China and its causes: A review of the literature. Aust N Z J Crimonol 43:557-579.

• Zartner D, Ramos J (2011) Human rights as reputation builder: Compliance with the Convention Against Torture. Hum Rights Rev 12:71-92.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zech ST (2017) Counter-terrorizing: The use of torture in Peru’s counterterrorism campaign. Terror Polit Viol 29:254-276.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zhou Y, Kiyani G, Crabtree C (2022) New evidence that naming and shaming influences state human rights practices. J Hum Rights.

Download references