• Aginsky, B. W. (1939). Control in the Shanel (Pomo) Tribe.American Sociological Review, 4, 209–216.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Alès, C. (2002). A story of unspontaneous generation: Yanomami male co-procreation and the theory of substances. In S. Beckerman & P. Valentine (Eds.),Cultures of multiple fathers: The theory and practice of partible paternity in lowland South America (pp. 62–85). Gainesville: University Press of Florida.

  Google Scholar 

• Alexander, R. D. (1974). The evolution of social behavior.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 5, 325–383.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Alkire, W. H. (1965).Lamotrek Atoll and inter-island socioeconomic ties. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Balikci, A. (1963).The Netsilik Eskimo. New York: Natural History Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Beckerman, S., Lizarralde, R., Lizarralde, M., Bai, J., Ballew, C., Schroeder, S., et al. (2002). The Bari partible paternity project, phase one. In S. Beckerman & P. Valentine (Eds.),Cultures of multiple fathers: The theory and practice of partible paternity in lowland South America (pp. 27–41). Gainesville: University Press of Florida.

  Google Scholar 

• Beckerman, S., Lizzaralde, R., Ballew, C., Sissel, S., Fingelto, C., Garrison, A., et al. (1998). The Bari partible paternity project: preliminary results.Current Anthropology, 39, 164–167.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Beckerman, S., & Valentine, P. (Eds.). (2002a).Cultures of multiple fathers: The theory and practice of partible paternity in lowland South America. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.

  Google Scholar 

• Beckerman, S., & Valentine, P. (2002b). Introduction: The concept of partible paternity among native South Americans. In S. Beckerman & P. Valentine (Eds.),Cultures of multiple fathers: The theory and practice of partible paternity in South America (pp. 1–13). Gainesville: University of Florida Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Berreman, G. D. (1962). Pahari polyandry: a comparison.American Anthropologist, 64, 60–75.

  Google Scholar 

• Berreman, G. D. (1975). Himalayan polyandry and the domestic cycle.American Ethnologist, 2, 127–138.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Binford, L. (2002).Constructing frames of reference: An analytical method for archaeological theory building using ethnographic and environmental data sets. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Birdsell, J. (1958). On population structure in generalized hunting and collecting populations.Evolution, 12, 189–205.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Birdsell, J. (1968). Some predictions for the pleistocene based on equilibrium systems among recent foragers. In R. Lee & I. DeVore (Eds.),Man the hunter (pp. 229–240). Chicago: Aldine.

  Google Scholar 

• Birket-Smith, K. (1929).The Caribou Eskimos: Material and social life and their cultural position. Report of the Fifth Thule Expedition 1921–24, 5(1). Copenhagen: Gyldeddalske Boghandel, Nordisk Forlag.

• Bollig, L. (1967).The inhabitants of the Truk Islands: Religion, life, and a short grammar of a Micronesian people. New Haven, CT: Human Relations Area Files (Originally published in 1927).

• Bontier, P., Le Verrier, J., & Major, R. H. (1872).The Canarian, or book of the conquest and conversion of the Canarians in the year 1402. London: Printed for the Hakluyt Society.

  Google Scholar 

• Burch, E. (1970). Marriage and divorce among North Alaskan Eskimos. In P. Bohannan (Ed.),Divorce and after (pp. 152–181). Garden City: Doubleday & Co.

  Google Scholar 

• Burch, E. S. (1975).Eskimo kinsmen: Changing family relationships in northwest Alaska. St. Paul: West.

  Google Scholar 

• Cartagenes, R. (2010). Ensaio Sobre os Zoe. Retrieved 5/22/2010, fromhttp://www.amazoe.org.br/textoreferencia/ensaio_livro_tupi.pdf

• Cassidy, M. L., & Lee, G. R. (1989). Study of polyandry: a critique and synthesis.Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 20, 1–11.

  Google Scholar 

• Chandra, R. (1987). Polyandry in the North-Western Himalayas: Some changing trends. In M. K. Raha & P. C. Coomar (Eds.),Polyandry in India (pp. 130–154). Delhi: Gian.

  Google Scholar 

• Chernela, J. M. (2002). Fathering in the Northwest Amazon of Brazil: Competition, Monopoly, and Partition. In S. Beckerman & P. Valentine (Eds.),Cultures of multiple fathers: The theory and practice of partible paternity in lowland South America (pp. 160–177). Gainesville: University Press of Florida.

  Google Scholar 

• Cooper, J. M. (1942). Some anthropological publications of 1941.Primitive Man, 15(3/4), 71–74.

  Google Scholar 

• Cormier, L. A. (2003).Kinship with monkeys: The Guaja foragers of Eastern Amazonia. New York: Columbia University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Crocker, W. H. (2002). Canela “Other Fathers”: Partible paternity and its changing practices. In S. Beckerman & P. Valentine (Eds.),Cultures of multiple fathers: The theory and practice of partible paternity in lowland South America (pp. 86–104). Gainesville: University Press of Florida.

  Google Scholar 

• Czaplicka, M. A. (1914).Aboriginal Siberia, a study in social anthropology. Oxford: Clarendon.

  Google Scholar 

• Damas, D. (1975). Demographic aspects of Central Eskimo marriage practices.American Ethnologist, 2, 409–418.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Davydov, G. I., Khvostov, N. A., & Shishkov, A. S. (1810).Dvukratnoe puteshestvie.

• De Laguna, F. (1972).Under Mount Saint Elias: The history and culture of the Yakutat Tlingit. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Deacon, B., & Wedgwood, C. H. (1934).Malekula, a vanishing people in the New Hebrides. London: G. Routledge & Sons.

  Google Scholar 

• Dempsey, H. A. (1986).The Blackfoot Indians. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.

  Google Scholar 

• Dutilleux, J. P. (Writer) (2007). “The Zo-é: Nomads from the Amazon.” Alexandra Films. Available athttp://oxfordhumanities.com/products_details.php?name=products&id=37

• Ember, C. (1983). The relative decline in women’s contribution to agriculture with intensification.American Anthropologist, 85, 285–304.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Emlen, S. T., & Oring, L. W. (1977). Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems.Science, 197, 215–223.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Endicott, K., & Endicott, K. (2008).The headman was a woman. Denver: Waveland.

  Google Scholar 

• Erikson, P. (2002). Several fathers in one’s cap: Polyandrous conception among the Panoan Matis (Amazonas, Brazil). In S. Beckerman & P. Valentine (Eds.),Cultures of multiple fathers: The theory and practice of partible paternity in lowland South America (pp. 123–136). Gainesville: University Press of Florida.

  Google Scholar 

• Finley, J. P., & Churchill, W. (1913).The Subanu: Studies of a sub-Visayan mountain folk of Mindanao. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington.

  Google Scholar 

• Fisher, H. (2000). Lust, attraction, attachment: biology and the evolution of the three primary emotion systems of mating, reproduction, and parenting.Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 25, 96–103.

  Google Scholar 

• Fisher, H., Aron, A., & Brown, L. (2006). Romantic love: a mammalian brain system for mate choice.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 6, 2173–2186.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gardner, P. M. (1972). The Paliyans. In M. G. Bicchieri (Ed.),Hunters and gatherers today (pp. 404–450). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

  Google Scholar 

• Goldizen, A. W. (1990). A comparative perspective on the evolution of tamarin and marmoset social systems.International Journal of Primatology, 11, 63–83.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gayton, A. H. (1948).Yokuts and Western Mono ethnography: Tulare Lake, Southern Valley, and Central Foothill Yokuts. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Goldman, I. (1963).The Cubeo Indians of the Northwest Amazon (Vol. 2). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Goldstein, M. C. (1978). Pahari and Tibetan polyandry revisited.Ethnology, 17, 325–337.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gomes, M. P. (1991).O povo Guaja e as condicoes reais para a sua sobrevivencia. São Paulo: Centro Ecumenico de Documentacao e Informacao.

  Google Scholar 

• Gomes, M. P. (1996).Os indios Guaja: demografia, terra, perspectivas de futuro. Relatorio das pesquisas realizadas. Núcleo de Pesquisa Acadêmica da FAE Centro Universitário.

• Goodenough, W. H. (1951).Property, kin, and community on Truk. New Haven: Yale University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Goody, J. (1976).Production and reproduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Gough, E. K. (1952). Changing kinship usages in the setting of political and economic change among the Nayars of Malabar.Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 82, 71–87.

  Google Scholar 

• Gough, E. K. (1959). The Nayars and the definition of marriage.Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 89, 23–34.

  Google Scholar 

• Gregor, T. (1985).Anxious pleasures: The sexual lives of an Amazonian people. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Grinnell, G. B. (1891). Marriage among the pawnees.American Anthropologist, 4, 275–282.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Guttentag, M., & Secord, P. F. (1983).Too many women? The sex ratio question. Beverly Hills: Sage.

  Google Scholar 

• Haddix, K. A. (2001). Leaving your wife and your brothers: when polyandrous marriages fall apart.Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 47–60.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Haddix, K. A., & Gurung, J. (1999). “Excess women”: non-marriage and reproduction in two ethnic Tibetan communities of Humla, Nepal.Himalayan Research Bulletin, 19(1), 56–65.

  Google Scholar 

• Hames, R. (1992). Variation in paternal care among the Yanomamö. In B. Hewlett (Ed.),The father’s role: Cultural and evolutionary perspectives (pp. 85–110). Chicago: Aldine de Gruyter.

  Google Scholar 

• Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior, II.Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 17–52.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Heinsohn, R., Ebert, D., Legge, S., et al. (2007). Genetic evidence for cooperative polyandry in reverse dichromaticEclectus parrots.Animal Behaviour, 74, 1047–1054.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hill, K., & Hurtado, A. M. (1996).Ache life history: The ecology and demography of a foraging people. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

  Google Scholar 

• Hollis, A. C. (1905).The Masai: Their language and folklore. Oxford: Clarendon.

  Google Scholar 

• Hose, C., McDougall, W., & Haddon, A. C. (1912).The pagan tribes of Borneo: a description of their physical, moral and intellectual condition, with some discussion of their ethnic relations. London: Macmillan.

  Google Scholar 

• Howitt, A. W. (1904).The native tribes of south-east Australia. London: Macmillan.

  Google Scholar 

• Hrdlicka, A. (1975).The anthropology of Kodiak Island. New York: AMS.

  Google Scholar 

• Hrdy, S. B. (1981).The woman that never evolved. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Hrdy, S. B. (2000). The optimal number of fathers: evolution, demography, and history in the shaping of female mate preferences.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 907, 75–96.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hrdy, S. B. (2005). Comes the child before man: How cooperative breeding and prolonged postweaning dependence shaped human potentials. In B. Hewlett & M. Lamb (Eds.),Hunter-gatherer childhoods: Evolutionary, developmental and colonial perspectives (pp. 65–91). Piscataway: Aldine Transaction.

  Google Scholar 

• Hrdy, S. B. (2009).Mothers and others. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Jankowiak, W., Sudakov, M., & Wilreker, B. C. (2005). Co-wife conflict and co-operation.Ethnology, 44, 81–98.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Janssen, M. H., Arcese, P., Sloan, M. S., & Jewell, K. J. (2008). Polyandry and sex ratio in the song sparrow.The Wilson Journal of Ornithology, 120, 395–398.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jennes, D. (1922).The Life of the Copper Eskimos. Report of the Canadian Arctic Expedition 1913–18, vol. 12. Ottawa: F. A. Ackland.

• Jochelson, W. (1908).The Koryak. Leiden: E. J. Brill ltd.

  Google Scholar 

• Jones, D. M. (1976).Aleuts in transition: A comparison of two villages. Seattle: Published for the Institute of Social, Economic, and Government Research, University of Alaska, by the University of Washington Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Kasdan, L. (1965). Family structure, migration and the entrepreneur.Comparative Studies in Society and History, 7, 345–357.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kensinger, K. M. (2002). The dilemmas of co-paternity in Cashinahua Society. In S. Beckerman & P. Valentine (Eds.),Cultures of multiple fathers: The theory and practice of partible paternity in lowland South America (pp. 14–26). Gainesville: University Press of Florida.

  Google Scholar 

• Kjellstrom, R. (1973).Eskimo marriage. Stockholm: Nordiska Meseets.

  Google Scholar 

• Kramer, K. (2010). Cooperative breeding and its significance to the demographic success of humans.Annual Review of Anthropology, 39, 417–436.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Krause, A. (1956).The Tlingit Indians: Results of a trip to the northwest coast of America and the Bering Straits. Seattle: Published for the American Ethnological Society by the University of Washington Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Kruger, D. J., & Nesse, R. M. (2006). An evolutionary life-history framework for understanding sex differences in human mortality rates.Human Nature, 17, 74–97.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kurbanov, A. (2010).The Hephthalites: An archaeological and historical analysis. Berlin: Free University.

  Google Scholar 

• La Barre, W. (1948).The Aymara Indians of the Lake Titicaca Plateau. Menasha: American Anthropological Association.

  Google Scholar 

• Lantis, M. (1970). The Aleut social system: 1750 to 1810. In R. E. Ackerman (Ed.),Ethnohistory in southwestern Alaska and the southern Yukon (pp. 139–301). Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.

  Google Scholar 

• Lantis, M. (1984). Aleut. In D. Damas (Ed.),Arctic: Handbook of North American Indians 5 (pp. 161–184). Washington D.C: Smithsonian Institution Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Laraia, R. de B. (1963). “Arranjos Poliandricos” na Sociedade Surui.Revista do Museu Paulista, 14, 71–75.

• Lee, R. B. (1972). !Kung Spatial Organization: an ecological and historical perspective.Human Ecology, 1, 125–147.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lesser, A. (1930). Levirate and fraternal polyandry among the pawnees.Man, 30, 98–101.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Levine, N. E. (1990). Nyinba polyandry and the allocation of paternity.Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 11, 283–298.

  Google Scholar 

• Levine, N. E., & Sangree, W. H. (1980). Conclusion: Asian and African systems of polyandry.Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 11, 385–410.

  Google Scholar 

• Levine, N. E., & Silk, J. B. (1997). Why polyandry fails: sources of instability in polyandrous marriages.Current Anthropology, 38, 375–398.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Linnekin, J. (1990).Sacred queens and women of consequence: rank, gender, and colonialism in the Hawaiian Islands. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Lips, J. E. (1947). Naskapi law: law and order in a hunting society.Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 37, 379–492.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Majumdar, D. N. (1962).Himalayan Polyandry. London: Asia Publishing House.

  Google Scholar 

• Marlowe, F. W. (2000). Paternal investment and the human mating systems.Behavioural Processes, 51, 45–61.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Marlowe, F. W. (2003). The mating system of foragers in the standard cross-cultural sample.Cross-Cultural Research, 37, 282–306.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Muller, J. C. (1980). On the relevance of having two husbands: contribution to the study of polygynous/polyandrous marital forms of the Jos Plateau.Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 11(3), 359–369.

  Google Scholar 

• Murdock, G. P. (1949).Social structure. New York: Macmillan.

  Google Scholar 

• Murdock, G. P. (1957). World ethnographic sample.American Anthropologist, 59, 664–687.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Murdock, G. P. (1967). Ethnographic atlas: a summary.Ethnology, 6, 109–236.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Murdock, G. P., & White, D. (1969). Standard cross-cultural sample.Ethnology, 8, 329–369.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Parmar, Y. S. (1975).Polyandry in the Himalayas. Delhi: Vikas.

  Google Scholar 

• Park, W. Z. (1937). Paviotso polyandry.American Anthropologist, 39, 366–368.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Peter, Prince of Greece. (1963).A study of polyandry. Mouton: The Hague.

  Google Scholar 

• Peters, J. F. (1982). Polyandry among the Yanomama revisited.Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 13, 89–95.

  Google Scholar 

• Peters, J. F. (1998).Life among the Yanomami. New York: Broadview.

  Google Scholar 

• Peters, J. F., & Hunt, C. L. (1975). Polyandry among the Yanomama Shirishana.Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 6, 197–207.

  Google Scholar 

• Phillips, H. P. (1965).Thai peasant personality: The patterning of interpersonal behavior in the village of Bang Chan. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Pollet, T. V., & Nettle, D. (2008). Driving a hard bargain: sex ratio and male marriage success in a historical US population.Biology Letters, 4, 31–33.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pollock, D. (2002). Partible paternity and multiple maternity among the Kulina. In S. Beckerman & P. Valentine (Eds.),Cultures of multiple fathers: The theory and practice of partible paternity in lowland South America (pp. 42–61). Gainesville: University Press of Florida.

  Google Scholar 

• Rasmussen, K. (1931).The Netsilik Eskimos. Report of the Fifth Thule Expedition 1921-24, vol. 8. Copenhagen: Gyldeddalske Boghandel, Nordisk Forlag.

• Rainey, F. G. (1947).The whale hunters of Tigara. Anthropological Papers of the AMNH 41(2). New York. Available online athttp://digitallibrary.amnh.org/dspace/handle/2246/125.

• Reid, J. P. (1970).A law of blood: The primitive law of the Cherokee nation. New York: New York University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Riazanovskii, V. A. (1965).Fundamental principles of Mongol law. London: K. Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co.

  Google Scholar 

• Roscoe, R. C. J. (1932). Immigrants and their influence in the Lake Region of Central Africa. In W. R. Dawson (Ed.),The Frazer lectures, 1922–1932 (pp. 25–46). London: Macmillan.

  Google Scholar 

• Saksena, R. N. (1962).Social economy of a polyandrous people. London: Asia Publishing House.

  Google Scholar 

• Sangree, W. H. (1980). The persistence of polyandry in Irigwe, Nigeria.Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 11, 335–343.

  Google Scholar 

• Schaffner, C. M., & French, J. A. (2004). Behavioral and endocrine responses in male marmosets to the establishment of multimale breeding groups: evidence for non-monopolizing facultative polyandry.International Journal of Primatology, 25, 709–732.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schebesta, P. (1954).The Negritos of Asia. Wien-Modling: St. Gabriel-Verlag.

  Google Scholar 

• Service, E. R. (1962).Primitive Social Organization: An evolutionary perspective. New York: Random House.

  Google Scholar 

• Skeat, W. W., & Blagden, C. O. (1966).Pagan races of the Malay Peninsula. New York: Barnes & Noble.

  Google Scholar 

• Smith, A. M. (1974).Ethnography of the Northern Utes. Santa Fe: Museum of New Mexico Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Smith, E. A., & Smith, S. A. (1994). Inuit sex-ratio variation: population control, ethnographic error, or parental manipulation?Current Anthropology, 35, 595–624.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Smith, E. (1998). Is Tibetan polyandry adaptive? Methodological and metatheoretical analyses.Human Nature, 9, 225–261.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Smuts, B. (1992). Male aggression against women: an evolutionary perspective.Human Nature, 3, 1–44.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Spencer, P. (1988).The Maasai of Matapato: A study of rituals of rebellion. Bloomington: Indiana University Press in association with the International African Institute, London.

  Google Scholar 

• Spiro, M. E. (1975).Kibbutz: Venture in utopia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Starkweather, K. (2010). Exploration into human polyandry: An evolutionary examination of the non-classical cases. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln.

• Stefansson, V. (1921).The friendly Arctic: The story of five years in Polar regions. New York: Macmillan.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Steward, J. H. (1936). Shoshoni polyandry.American Anthropologist, 38, 561–564.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Stone, E. A., Shackelford, T. K., & Buss, D. M. (2007). Sex ratio and mate preferences: a cross-cultural investigation.European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 288–296.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Symons, D. (1982). Another woman that never existed.Quarterly Review of Biology, 57, 297–300.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Symons, D. (1989). A critique of Darwinian anthropology.Ethology and Sociobiology, 10, 131–144.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Symons, D. (1992). On the use and misuse of Darwinism in the Study of Human Behavior. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.),The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 137–159). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Tambiah, S. J. (1966). Polyandry in Ceylon. In C. von Fuhrer-Haimendorf (Ed.),Caste and kin in Nepal, India and Ceylon (pp. 264–358). London: Asia Publishing House.

  Google Scholar 

• Tew, M. (1951). A form of polyandry among the Lele of the Kasai.Journal of the International African Institute, 21, 1–12.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Valentine, P. (2002). Fathers that never exist: Exclusion of the role of shared father among the Curripaco of the northwest Amazon. In S. Beckerman & P. Valentine (Eds.),Cultures of multiple fathers: The theory and practice of partible paternity in lowland South America (pp. 178–191). Gainesville: University of Florida Press.

  Google Scholar 

• VanStone, J. W. (1962).Point hope, an Eskimo village in transition. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Wagner, A. P., Creel, S., Frank, L. G., & Kalinowski, S. T. (2007). Patterns of relatedness and parentage in an asocial, polyandrous striped hyena population.Molecular Ecology, 16, 4356–4369.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Walker, R. S., Flinn, M. V., & Hill, K. R. (2010). Evolutionary history of partible paternity in lowland South America.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA), 107, 195–200.

  Google Scholar 

• Walum, H., Westberg, L., Henningsson, S., Neiderhiser, J. M., Reiss, D., Igl, W., et al. (2008). Genetic variation in the vasopressin receptor 1a gene (AVPR1A) associates with pair-bonding behavior in humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA), 105, 14153–14156.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Westermarck, E. (1926).A short history of marriage. New York: Macmillan.

  Google Scholar 

• Weyer, E. M. (1932).The Eskimos: Their environment and folkways. New Haven: Yale University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Weyer, E. M. (1959).Primitive peoples today. Garden City: Doubleday.

  Google Scholar 

Download references