Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Policing Protest Events: The Great Strike of 1877 and WTO Protests of 1999

  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The notion of the police as protecting dominant economic interests is explored by presenting two case studies of direct action social movements occurring nearly 100 years apart. Recent protests in response to a non-state international organization (the World Trade Organization) are compared with a major labor strike of the late 19th century (the Great Strike of 1877). Historical data supports the contention that, despite many changes to contemporary policing strategies, the police are routinely used to protect existing economic structures. These narratives demonstrate how shifts in economic institutions shape formal social control practices. Comparing these events reveals how new technologies have allowed for certain adaptations and innovations for contemporary protesting and protest breaking activities. It is argued that the police institution should not be understood as only charged with responding reactively to criminal violations, but rather as serving more important social functions such as protecting dominant economic structures.

This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from ¥17,985 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Notes

  1. Earl et al. (2003) used newspaper accounts of protest events occurring between 1968 and 1973, and found that in nearly 70% of the 1,905 protest events the police did not attend.

  2. Sir Robert Peel is credited with establishing the first bureaucratically organized, publicly funded, official police force, in 1829, in London. These officers wore uniforms, carried a night stick, conducted foot patrol, and were referred to as Bobbies in reference to Sir Peel.

  3. This is not meant as a complete history of the development of the U.S. police force as much as a brief sketch of important events shaping the development of this institution. This historical account of American policing is only meant to demonstrate the various administrative alterations in this modern institution. For a thorough account of the evolution of the contemporary police institution from the earlier notions of police science, see Knemeyer (1980), McMullan (1998a,b), Pasquino (1991).

  4. This figure is not adjusted for inflation. However, a non-scientific inflation adjustment found athttp://www.westegg.com/inflation/infl.cgi adjusts the $45 million (in 1900) to about $997 million (in 2005).

  5. Ironically, these features of global capitalism are employed by the WTO protesters against the very structure that demands their existence.

  6. This is a similar situation as described nearly two decades earlier inThe New International Division of Labor in the World Economy as it demonstrated the interconnected nature of global production processes and the continual disenfranchisement of workers in general, and those in poorer nations particularly.

References

  • Ayres, J. (1998). From the streets to the internet: The cyber-diffusion of contention.The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,566(1), 132–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (2000).What is globalization? Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittner, E. (1967). The police on skid-row: A study of peace keeping.American Sociological Review,32(5), 699–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2001). Uniting to better dominate.Items and Issues: Social Science Research Council,2(3–4), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, R. (1959).1877: Year of violence. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1999).Profit over people: Neoliberalism and global order. New York: Seven Stories Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, C. (2007). State repression and political order.Annual Review of Political Science,10, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • della Porta, D., & Reiter, H. (1998).Policing protest: The control of mass demonstrations in western democracies. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • della Porta, D., & Tarrow, S. (2001). After Genoa and New York: The antiglobal movement, the police and terrorism.Items and Issues: Social Science Research Council,2(3–4), 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • della Porta, D., & Tarrow, S. (Eds.) (2005).Transnational protest & global activism. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

  • DiMaggio, P., & Powell, P. (1991).The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer (2007). City police spied broadly before G.OP. convention.New York Times, March 25, Late edition-final, section 1, page 1, column 5, 2460 words.

  • Earl, J. (2003). Tanks, tear gas, and taxes: Toward a theory of movement repression.Sociological Theory,21, 44–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earl, J. (2006). Introduction: Repression and the social control of protest.Mobilization: An International Journal,11(2), 129–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl, J., & Soule, S. (2006). Seeing blue: A police-centered explanation of protest policing.Mobilization: An International Journal,11(2), 145–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl, J., Soule, S., & McCarthy, J. (2003). Protest under fire? Explaining the policing of protest.American Sociological Review,68, 581–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericson, R., & Doyle, A. (1999). Globalization and the policing of protest: The case of the APEC 1997.British Journal of Sociology,50(4), 589–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feeley, M., & Simon, J. (1992). The new penology: Notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications.Criminology,30, 449–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feeley, M., & Simon, J. (1994). Actuarial justice: The emerging new criminal law. In D. Nelkin (Ed.)The futures of criminology. California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, D., Stanley, K., Berman, D., & Neff, G. (2005). How do organizations matter? Mobilization and support for participants at five globalization protests.Social Problems,52(1), 102–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foner, P. (1977).The great labor uprising of 1877. New York: Monad Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1975).Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, W. (1990).The strategy of social protest. Reprint. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, D. (1990).Punishment and society. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

  • Giddens, A. (1990).The consequences of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillham, P., & Marx, G. (2000). Complexity and irony in policing and protesting: The World Trade Organization in Seattle.Social Justice,27(2), 212–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, A. (2007). NYPD debates civil liberties attorney over police spying protesters. Democracy Now.http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/03/26/1329207. March 26.

  • Gunman, H. (1961). Trouble on the railroads in 1873–4: Prelude to 1877 crisis.Labor History,2, 215–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper’s Weekly. The great strike.http://www.catskillarchive.com/rrextra/sk7711.Html. August 11, 1877.

  • Harring, S. L. (1983).Policing a class society: The experience of American cities, 1865–1915. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D. (2000). The changing contours of political community: Rethinking democracy in the context of globalization. In R. Ericson & N. Stehr (Eds.),Governing modern societies (pp. 42–59). Toronto: Toronto University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, P., & Thompson, G. (1996).Globalization in question. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irons, J. (2006). Who rules social control of protest? Variability in the state-countermovement relationship.Mobilization: An International Journal,11(2), 165–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, F. (2000). Globalization and political strategy.New Left Review,4, 49–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kappeler, V. E. (1996). Making police history in light of modernity: A sign of the times?Police Forum,6(3), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keck, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998).Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelling, G., & Moore, M. (1998). The evolving strategy of policing. In V. E. Kappeler (Ed.),Police and society: Touchstone readings. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knemeyer, F. (1980). Polizei.Economy and Society,9, 172–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J. (1992).Institutions and conflict. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, D. (1982).Political process and the development of black insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, D. (1988).Freedom summer. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMullan, J. (1998a). Social surveillance and the rise of the police machine.Theoretical Criminology,2, 93–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMullan, J. (1998b). The arresting eye: Discourse, surveillance and disciplinary administration in early English police thinking.Social & Legal Studies,7, 97–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J. (2004). Comparative-historical methodology.Annual Review of Sociology,30, 81–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J., Britt, D., & Wolfson, M. (1991). The institutional channeling of social movements by the state in the United States.Research in Social Movements, Conflicts, and Change,13, 45–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J., & McPhail, C. (1998). The institutionalization of protest in the United States. In D. S. Meyer & S. Tarrow (Eds.),The social movement society. Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPhail, C., Schweingruber, D., & McCarthy, J. (1998). Protest policing in the United States, 1960–1995. In D. della Porta & H. Reiter (Eds.),Policing protest: The control of mass demonstrations in western democracies. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohmae, K. (1990).The borderless world. London: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasquino, P. (1991). Theatrum politicum: The genealogy of capital – police and the state of prosperity. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.),The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 105–118). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piven, F., & Cloward, R. (1977).Poor people’s movements: Why they succeed, how they fail. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poster, M. (1990).The mode of information: Poststructuralism and social context. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  • Rusche, G., & Krichheimer, O. (2003).Punishment and social structure. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, W. (1996). Historical events as transformations of structures: Inventing revolution at the Bastille.Theory and Society,25, 841–881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skolnick, J. (1969).The politics of protest. New York: Ballantine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. (2002). Globalizing resistance: The battle of Seattle and the future of social movements. In J. Smith & H. Johnston (Eds.),Globalization and resistance: Transnational dimensions of social movements (pp. 183–199). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D. (2004). Social movements as challenges to authority: Resistance to an emerging conceptual hegemony.Research in Social Movements, Conflicts, and Change,25, 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spierenburg, P. (1984).The spectacle of suffering: Executions and the evolution of repression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starhawk. (2002).Webs of power: Notes from the global uprising. Gabriola Island. British Columbia: New Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmo, S., Thelen, K., & Longstreth, F. (1992).Structuring politics: Historical institutionalism in comparative analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowell, D. (1999).Streets, railroads, and the great strike of 1877. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strecher, V. G. (1991 [1998]). Revising the histories and futures of policing. In V. E. Kappeler (Ed.),Police and society: Touchstone readings (pp. 69–82). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (1978).From mobilization to revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S. (1998). Broken windows and fractured history: The use and misuse of history in recent police patrol analysis. In V. E. Kappeler (Ed.),Police and society: Touchstone readings (pp. 51–65). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S. (1980).Popular justice: A history of American criminal justice. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, H., & Murphy, P. (1998). The evolving strategy of police: A minority view. In V. E. Kappeler (Ed.),Police and society: Touchstone readings (pp. 27–50). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, L., & Moore, K. (2002). Target practice: Community activism in a global era. In B. Shepard & R. Hayduk (Eds.),From ACT UP to the WTO: Urban protest and community building in the era of globalization. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinn, H. (2003).A people’s history of the United States: 1492 to present. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I wish to thank Thomas Janoski, Patrick Mooney, and Alan Dahl for reviewing earlier versions of this article. I also wish to thank the anonymous reviewers and the editor, Brian Payne, for helpful comments that have improved this article. All shortcomings are the sole responsibility of the author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, The University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA

    Matthew DeMichele

Authors
  1. Matthew DeMichele

Corresponding author

Correspondence toMatthew DeMichele.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from ¥17,985 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Advertisement


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp