• Ackema, P., & Čamdžić, A. (2003). LF complex predicate formation: The case of participle fronting in Serbo-Croatian.UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 15, 131–175.

  Google Scholar 

• Adger, D. (2000). First position and the syntax/prosody interface: old Irish preverbs. InProceedings of WCCFL (Vol. 19, pp. 1–14). Somerville, MA: Cascadila Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Alexiadou, A., & Anagnostopoulou, E. (1998). Parametrizing AGR: Word-order, V-movement and EPP checking.Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16, 491–539.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Anderson, S. R. (1993). Wackernagel’s revenge: Clitics, morphology, and the syntax of second position.Language, 69, 68–98.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Anderson, S. R. (1995). Rules and constraints in describing the morphology of phrases. InCLS Parasession volume on Clitics (Vol. 31, pp. 15–31). Chicago Linguistic Society.

• Anderson, S. R. (1996). How to put your clitics in their place.The Linguistic Review, 13, 165–191.

  Google Scholar 

• Anderson, S. R. (2000). Towards an optimal account of second position phenomena. In J. Dekkers, et al. (Eds.),Optimality theory: syntax, phonology and acquisition (pp. 302–333). Cambridge: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Anderson, S. R. (2004). Subject clitics and verb-second in Surmiran Rumantsch.MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 47, 1–22.

  Google Scholar 

• Anderson, S. R. (2005).Aspects of the theory of clitics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Anttila, A. (2002). Variation and phonological theory. In J. Chambers, P. Trudgill, & N. Schilling-Estes (Eds.),Handbook of language variation and change (pp. 206–243). Oxford: Blackwell.

  Google Scholar 

• Austin, P., & Bresnan, J. (1996). Non-configurationality in Australian aboriginal languages.Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 14.2, 215–268.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Berendsen, E. (1986).The phonology of cliticization. Dordrecht: Foris.

  Google Scholar 

• Berry, L. M. (1999).Alignment and adjacency in optimality theory: Evidence from Warlpiri and Arrernte. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of Sydney.

• Billings, L. A. (2002). Phrasal clitics.Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 10.1, 53–104.

  Google Scholar 

• Bittner, M., & Hale, K. (1995). Remarks on definiteness in Warlpiri. In E. Bach, E. Jelinek, A. Kratzer, & B. Partee (Eds.),Quantification in natural language (pp. 81–106). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  Google Scholar 

• Bobaljik, J. D. (2002). A-chains at the PF-interface: Copies and “Covert” movement.Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 20.2, 197–267.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Boersma, P. (1998).Functional phonology: Formalizing the interactions between articulatory and perceptual drives. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.

• Borsley, R. D., Rivero, M. L., & Stephens, J. (1996). Long head movement in Breton. In R. Borsley & I. Roberts (Eds.),The Syntax of the celtic languages (pp. 53–74). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Bošković, Ž. (1995). Participle movement and second position cliticization in Serbo-Croatian.Lingua, 96, 245–266.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bošković, Ž. (2001).On the Nature of the Syntax-Phonology Interface. Elsevier.

• Butcher, A., & Harrington, J. (2003a). An Acoustic and articulatory analysis of focus and the word/morpheme boundary distinction in Warlpiri. InProceedings of the 6th international seminar on speech production (pp. 19–24). Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science, Macquarie University.

• Butcher, A., & Harrington, J. (2003b). An instrumental analysis of focus and juncture in Warlpiri. In M. J. Solé, D. Recasens, & J. Romero (Eds.),Proceedings of the 15th international congress of the phonetic sciences (pp. 321–324). Barcelona: Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona.

  Google Scholar 

• Caink, A. D. (1999). Against long head movement. In M. Dimitrova-Vulchanova & L. Hellan (Eds.),Topics in south slavic syntax and semantics (pp. 91–123). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  Google Scholar 

• Carnie, A., Harley, H., & Pyatt. E. (2000). VSO order as raising out of the IP? Some evidence from old Irish. In A. Carnie & E. Guilfoyle (Eds.),The syntax of verb-initial languages (pp. 39–60). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Chomsky, N. (1993). A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.),The view from building 20 (pp. 1–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Chomsky, N. (1995).The minimalist program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.),Ken Hale: A life in language, (pp. 1–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Cinque, G. (1999).Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Embick, D. (1997).Voice and the interfaces of syntax. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.

• Embick, D. (2000). Features, syntax and categories in the latin perfect.Linguistic Inquiry, 31(2), 185–230.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Embick, D., & Izvorski, R. (1994). On long head movement. In J. M. Fuller, H. Han, & D. Parkinson (Eds.),Proceedings of ESCOL (pp. 104–115). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Embick, D., & Noyer, R. (1999). Locality in post-syntactic operations. InMITWPL 34: Papers on morphology and syntax, cycle two (pp. 265–317). Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.

  Google Scholar 

• Embick, D., & Noyer, R. (2001). Movement operations after syntax.Linguistic Inquiry, 32(4), 555–595.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fanselow, G. (2002). Münchhausen-style head movement and the analysis of verb second. In A. Mahajan (Ed.),Proceedings of the workshop on head movement (pp. 40–76). Los Angeles: UCLA Linguistics Department.

  Google Scholar 

• Franks, S. (1997). South slavic clitic placement isstill syntactic. InProceedings of the 21st annual penn linguistics Colloquium (pp. 111–126).

• Franks, S. (1998). Clitics in slavic. Paper presented at the comparative slavic morphosyntax workshop. Indiana University.

• Franks, S., & Progovac, L. (1994). On the placement of Serbo-Croatian clitics.Indiana Linguistics Studies, 7, 69–78.

  Google Scholar 

• Granites, R. J., Hale, K. L., & Odling-Smee, D. (1976).Survey of Warlpiri Grammar. MIT ms.

• Groat, E., & O’Neil, J. (1996). Spell-out at the LF interface: Achieving a unified syntactic computational system in the minimalist framework. In W. Abraham, S. D. Epstein, H. Thráinsson, & J.-W. Zwart (Eds.),Minimal ideas (pp. 113–139). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  Google Scholar 

• Hale, K. (1960). Wal.piRi field notes. Available from the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies Library.

• Hale, K. (1966). Wal.piRi field notes. Available from the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies Library.

• Hale, K. (1973). Person marking in Walbiri. In S. R. Anderson & P. Kiparsky (Eds.),A festschrift for Morris Halle (pp. 308–344). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc.

  Google Scholar 

• Hale, K. (1976).Lessons in Warlpiri I-VIII. MIT ms.

• Hale, K. (1983). Warlpiri and the grammar of non-configurational languages.Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 1.1, 5–47.

  Google Scholar 

• Hale, K., Laughren, M., & Simpson, J. (1995). Warlpiri syntax. In J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld, & T. Vennemann (Eds.),Syntax. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung an international handbook of contemporary research (pp. 1430–51). Berlin New York: Walter de Gruyter.

• Halle, M. (1997). Distributed morphology: Impoverishment and fission. In B. Bruening, Y. Kang & M. McGinnis (Eds.),PF: Papers at the interface. MIT working papers in linguistics (Vol. 30, pp. 425–449).

• Halpern, A. (1995).On the placement and morphology of clitics. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

  Google Scholar 

• Harvey, M., & Baker, B. (2005). Vowel harmony, directionality and morpheme structure constraints in Warlpiri.Lingua, 115, 1457–1474.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Holmberg, A. (2000). Scandinavian stylistic fronting: How any category can become an expletive.Linguistic Inquiry, 31, 445–484.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Holmberg, A. (2005). Stylistic fronting. In M. Everaert & H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.),The blackwell companion to syntax IV (pp. 530–563). Oxford: Blackwell.

  Google Scholar 

• Holmberg, A., & Platzack, C. (1995).The role of inflection in scandinavian syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Hrafnbjargarson, G. H. (2004). Stylistic fronting.Studia Linguistica, 58.2, 88–134.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Iatridou, S. (1994). Comments on the paper by Roberts. In D. Lightfoot & N. Hornstein (Eds.),Verb movement (pp. 243–260). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Inkelas, S. (1989). Prosodic constituency in the Lexicon. Doctoral dissertation. Stanford University.

• Jelinek, E. (1984). Empty categories, case, and configurationality.Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 2, 39–76.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jónsson, J. G. (1991). Stylistic fronting in Icelandic.Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax, 48, 1–43.

  Google Scholar 

• Kager, R. (1995). Generalized alignment and morphological parsing. ROA #36-1094.

• King, T. H. (1996). Slavic clitics, long head movement, and prosodic inversion.Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 4, 274–311.

  Google Scholar 

• Kratzer, A. (1998). More structural analogies between tenses and pronouns. In D. Strolovitch & A. Lawson (Eds.),Proceedings of SALT VIII (pp. 92–110). Ithaca, N.Y.: CLC Publications.

  Google Scholar 

• Lambova, M. (2002). Is head movement syntactic: Evidence from Bulgarian.MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 43, 91–104.

  Google Scholar 

• Laughren, M. (1989). The configurationality parameter and Warlpiri. In L. K Maracz & P. Muysken (Eds.),Configurationality: The typology of asymmetries (pp. 319–353). Dordrecht: Foris.

  Google Scholar 

• Laughren, M. (2002). Syntactic constraints in a ‘free word order language. In M. Amberber & P. Collins (Eds.),Language universals and variation (pp. 83–130). Ablex Publishing Corp.

• Legate, J. A. (1996). Irish non-verbal predication: A reanalysis.Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, 15:1, 55–69.

  Google Scholar 

• Legate, J. A. (2002).Warlpiri: Theoretical implications. MIT dissertation. Distributed by MITWPL.

• Legate, J. A. (2003a). The configurational structure of a nonconfigurational language.Linguistic Variation Yearbook Vol. 1 2001, 61–104.

• Legate, J. A. (2003b). The morpho-semantics of Warlpiri counterfactual conditionals.Linguistic Inquiry, 34.1, 155–162.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Legate, J. A. (2005). Split absolutive. In A. Johns, D. Massam, & J. Ndayiragije (Eds.),Ergativity (pp. 143–171). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  Google Scholar 

• Legate, J. A. (in preparation).Warlpiri Preverbs. Cornell University ms.

• Legendre, G. (1998). Second position clitics in a V2 language: Conflict resolution in Macedonian. In J. Austin & A. Lawson (Eds.),Proceedings of the 1997 ESCOL meeting (pp. 139–149). CLC Publications, Cornell University.

• Legendre, G. (1999). Morphological and prosodic alignment at work: The case of south-slavic clitics. In S. J. Blake, E.-S. Kim, & K. N. Shahin (Eds.),Proceedings of WCCFL XVII. CSLI Publications (pp. 436–450). Stanford University.

• Legendre, G. (2000a). Optimal Romanian clitics: A cross-linguistic perspective. In V. Motapanyane (Ed.),Comparative studies in Romanian syntax (Vol. 58, pp. 227–264). Oxford: Elsevier, North Holland Linguistic Series.

• Legendre, G. (2000b). Morphological and prosodic alignment of bulgarian clitics. In J. Dekkers, F. van der Leeuw, & J. van de Weijer (Eds.),Optimality theory: Syntax, phonology, and acquisition (pp. 423–462). Oxford University Press.

• Legendre, G. (2000c). Positioning Romanian verbal clitics at PF: An optimality-theoretic analysis. In B. Gerlach & J. Grijzenhout (Eds.),Clitics from different perspectives (pp. 219–254). Johns Benjamins.

• Lema, J., & Rivero, M.-L. (1990). Long head movement: ECP vs. HMC. InProceedings of NELS 20 (pp. 333–347). GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

• Maling, J. (1990). Inversion in embedded clauses in modern icelandic. In J. Maling & A. Zaenen (Eds.),Syntax and semantics 24: modern icelandic syntax (pp. 71–91). San Diego: Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Marantz, A. (1984).On the nature of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Marantz, A. (1988). Clitics, morphological merger, and the mapping to phonological structure. In M. Hammond & M. Noonan (Eds.),Theoretical morphology (pp. 253–270). Academic Press.

• Marantz, A. (1995). A late note on late insertion. In K. Young-Sun, et al. (Eds.),Explorations in generative grammar (pp. 396–413). Seoul: Hankuk Publishing Co.

  Google Scholar 

• Marantz, A. (2001).Words. MIT ms.

• Massam, D., & Smallwood, C. (1997). Essential features of predication in English and Niuean. InProceedings of NELS 27. Amherst: GLSA.

  Google Scholar 

• Matthewson, L. (2002).An underspecified tense in Stát’imcets. Paper presented at WECOL, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.

• McConvell, P. (1996). The functions of split-Wackernagel clitic systems: Pronominal clitics in the Ngumpin languages. In A. Halpern & A. Zwicky (Eds.),Approaching second (pp. 299–331). Stanford: CSLI.

  Google Scholar 

• Nash, D. (1982). Warlpiri preverbs and verb roots. In S. Swartz (Ed.),Papers in Warlpiri grammar: In memory of Lothar Jagst work papers of SIL-AAB, series A (Vol. 6, pp. 165–216). Berrimah, N.T.: SIL-AAB.

• Nash, D. (1986).Topics in Warlpiri grammar. New York, London: Garland.

  Google Scholar 

• Pensalfini, R. (2000). Suffix coherence and stress in Australian languages. In J. Henderson (Ed.),Proceedings of the 1999 conference of the Australian linguistic society.

• Pentland, C. (2004).Stress in Warlpiri: Stress domains and word-level prosody. Masters thesis, The University of Queensland.

• Pentland, C., & Laughren, M. (2004).Distinguishing prosodic word and phonological word in Warlpiri: Prosodic constituency in morphologically complex words. Paper presented at the Australian linguistic society annual conference 2004, University of Sydney.

• Pesetsky, D. (1997). Optimality theory and syntax: Movement and pronunciation. In D. Archangeli & D. T. Langendoen (Eds.),Optimality theory: An overview (pp. 134–170). Oxford: Blackwell.

  Google Scholar 

• Platzack, C. (1987). The Scandinavian languages and the null-subject parameter.Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 5, 377–401.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Platzack, C. (1988). The emergence of a word order difference in Scandinavian subordinate clauses. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics: Special Issue on Comparative German Synatax, 215–238.

• Poole, G., & Burton-Roberts, N. (2004). MLC violations: Implications for the syntax/phonology interface. In A. Stepanov, G. Fanselow, & R. Vogel (Eds.),Minimality effects in syntax (pp. 327–366). New York: de Gruyter.

  Google Scholar 

• Progovac, L. (1996). Clitics in Serbian/Croatian: Comp as the second position. In A. Halpern & A. Zwicky (Eds.),Approaching second (pp. 411–428). Stanford: CLSI.

  Google Scholar 

• Ramchand, G. (2004).Distinguishing event structure from temporal structure. Paper presented at GLOW 27, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.

• Rivero, M.-L. (1991). Long head movement and negation: Serbo-Croatian vs Slovak and Czech.The Linguistic Review, 8, 319–351.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rivero, M.-L. (1994). Clause structure and V-movement in the languages of the Balkans.Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 12, 63–120.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rivero, M.-L. (1998). Verb movement and economy: Last resort. In M. Dimitrova-Vulchanova & L. Hellan (Eds.),Topics in south slavic syntax and semantics (pp. 1–23). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

  Google Scholar 

• Rivero, M.-L. (2000). Finiteness and second position in long head movement languages: Breton and slavic. In R. Borsley (Ed.),Syntax and semantics 32 (pp. 295–321). New York: Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Rivero, M.-L. (2003).Comparative balkan syntax. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Rizzi, L. (1990).Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (Ed.),Elements of grammar (pp. 281–337). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  Google Scholar 

• Roberts, I. (1991). Excorporation and minimality.Linguistic Inquiry, 22, 209–218.

  Google Scholar 

• Roberts, I. (1993).Verbs and diachronic syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  Google Scholar 

• Rögnvaldsson, E., & Thráinsson, H. (1990). On icelandic word order once more. In J. Maling & A. Zaenen (Eds.),Syntax and semantics 24: Modern icelandic syntax (pp. 3–40). San Diego: Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Schütze, C. (1994). Serbo-Croatian second position clitic placement and the phonology-syntax interface. In A. Carnie & H. Harley (Eds.),MITWPL 21: Papers on phonology and morphology (pp. 373–473).

• Selkirk, E. (1986). On derived domains in sentence phonology.Phonology, 3, 371–405.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Selkirk, E. (1995). The prosodic structure of function words. In J. Beckman, L. W. Dickey, & S. Urbanczyk (Eds.),Papers in optimality theory (pp. 439–470). Amherst: Dept. of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts.

  Google Scholar 

• Simpson, J. (1991).Warlpiri Morpho-Syntax. A lexicalist approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  Google Scholar 

• Smith, C. (1991).The paramter of aspect. Kluwer: Dordrecht.

  Google Scholar 

• Speas, M. J. (1990). The structure of Warlpiri. InPhrase structure in natural language. Studies on natural language and linguistic theory 21 (pp. 159–172). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  Google Scholar 

• Stjepanović, S. (1998). On the placement of Serbo-Croatian clitics: Evidence from VP ellipsis.Linguistic Inquiry, 29, 527–237.

  Google Scholar 

• Svenonius, P. (2004). Slavic prefixes inside and outside VP.Nordlyd, 32.2, 205–253.

  Google Scholar 

• Tomić, O. M. (1996). The Balkan Slavic clausal clitics.Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 14, 811–872.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Verkuyl, H. J. (1989). Aspectual classes and aspectual composition.Linguistics and Philosophy, 12, 39–94.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Warlpiri Dictionary Project (1993).Warlpiri dictionary. Ongoing work with numerous contributers. Machine-readable data files, deposited at ASEDA, AIATSIS.

• Wilder, C., & Ćavar, D. (1994a). Long head movement? Verb movement and cliticization in Croatian.Lingua, 93, 1–58.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wilder, C., & Ćavar, D. (1994b). Word order variation, verb movement, and economy principles.Studia Linguistica, 48, 46–86.

  Google Scholar 

• Zagona, K. (2004) Tense construal in complement clauses: Verbs of communication and the double access reading. In J. Guron & J. Lecarme (Eds.),The syntax of time (pp. 637–654). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Zec, D. (1988).Sonority constraints on prosodic structure. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University.

Download references