270Accesses
3Altmetric
Abstract
Engineering learning has long been a topic of attention. The traditional engineering learning mode has its own rationality, which is not without merit. The PBL (Problem-Based Learning) model provides new ideas of engineering learning, yet it lacks the “design” elements, seldom takes into consideration the social attribute of engineering, and falls short of clear support to guide learners in problem-solving. This paper analyzes the properties and characteristics of various types of engineering learning modes, based on which the engineering learning is divided into 4 key nodes. Besides, it proposes a design-based scaffold-type engineering learning model — SPSE (Scenario Prototype Scheme Evaluating), and explains SPSE from dimensions of engineering process, design and innovation. In order to improve the efficiency of SPSE engineering learning and training, a management platform software based on WEB and multimedia technology is designed. On the one hand, this software supports the communication and discussion between students and teachers. On the other hand, it supports the teacher to the student learning process monitoring and management. Finally, a successful case of SPSE teaching practice is used to further verify the rationality and effectiveness of engineering learning based on SPSE. Finally, a successful case of SPSE teaching practice is used to further verify the rationality and effectiveness of engineering learning based on SPSE.
This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.
Access this article
Subscribe and save
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
Buy Now
Price includes VAT (Japan)
Instant access to the full article PDF.








Similar content being viewed by others
References
Achichaski T Successful education -- how to train creative engineers, 2012th edn. China Machine Press, pp 220–221
Barrows HS (1996) Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: a brief overview. Bringing problem-based learning to higher education: theory and practice
Billett S (2016) Apprenticeship as a mode of learning and model of education. Educ Train 58(60):613–628
Crosthwaite C, Cameron I, Lant P, Litster J (2006) Balancing curriculum processes and content in a project Centred curriculum-in pursuit of graduate attributes. Educ Chem Eng 1:39–48
Dym CM, Agogino AM, Eris O, Frey DD, Leifer LJ (2005) Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learing. Engl Educ 94(1):103–120
Editor-in-chief (2003) The Oxford companion to the history of modern science. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 32–85
Edward F. Crawley, translated by Gu Peihua (2009) Re understanding of engineering education. Higher Education Publishing House, pp 230–281
Hill AM (2003) Technology and its study in Canadian secondary schools. Can J Sci Math Technol Educ 3(1):5–16
Hung W (2011) Theory to reality: a few issues in implementing problem-based learning. Educ Technol Res Dev 59(4):529–552
Jianmin G, Wang P (1999) Design: the new direction and old point of views of American engineering education. Global Education 5:128–265
Joseph Schumpeter, translated by He Wei (1997) Theory of economic development. The Commercial Press, pp 125–189
Karl Michem, translated by Qain Wang (2013) Engineering and philosophy: historical, philosophical and critical perspectives. Peoples publishing house, pp 5–60
Kolodner JL, Crismond D, Gray J et al (1998) Learning by design from theory to practice. Proceedings of the international conference of the learning sciences. AACE, Charlottesville, pp 16–22
Levison (2009) Models of apprenticeship.https://www.infoq.com/news/2009/03/models_apprenticeship
National Academy of Engineering (2012) Infusing real world experiences into engineering education. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, pp 1–20
Project-Based Learning, Edutopia (2016)https://www.edutopia.org/project-based-learning
Wood DF (2003) ABC of learning and teaching in medicine-problem based learning. BMJ 326(7348):328–330
Xiaodong Z, Wei Y, Mosi W (2017) Model innovation of design-based learning (DBL). Research in Higher Education of Engineering 1:17–22
Yang Y, Xiaobin M, Weinan W (2015) Training of technological innovation abilities based on OBE model. Research in Higher Education of Engineering 12:24–31
Yong Xiang L To let ‘innovative design’ be a way of thinking.http://www.news.zju.edu.cn/lecture.php id=39917
Yu J (2009) Analysis of the independent structure of participle by category prototype theory. Journal of Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics 28(6):62–64
Acknowledgements
This study has been supported by the educational reform project of Zhejiang province of China with the project No.jg20160228, and the Humanities and Social Sciences Foundation of the Ministry of Education with grant No.16YJCZH112.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Ningbo Institute of Technology, Zhejiang University, Ningbo, 315100, China
Wang Chengbo, Xiao Hui & Shiting Wen
- Wang Chengbo
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Xiao Hui
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Shiting Wen
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence toWang Chengbo.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chengbo, W., Hui, X. & Wen, S. SPSE — a model of engineering multimedia learning and training.Multimed Tools Appl78, 1149–1164 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6520-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative