298Accesses
20Citations
4 Altmetric
Einstein’s unpublished 1927 deterministic trajectory interpretation of quantum mechanics is critically examined, in particular with regard to the reason given by Einstein for rejecting his theory. It is shown that the aspect Einstein found objectionable—the mutual dependence of the motions of particles when the (many-body) wavefunction factorises—is a generic attribute of his theory but that this feature may be removed by modifying Einstein’s method in either of two ways: using a suggestion of Grommer or, in a physically important special case, using a simpler technique. It is emphasized though that the presence or absence of the interdependence property does not determine the acceptability of a trajectory theory. It is shown that there are other grounds for rejecting Einstein’s theory (and the two modified theories), to do with its domain of applicability and compatibility with empirical predictions. That Einstein’s reason for rejection is not a priori grounds for discarding a trajectory theory is demonstrated by reference to an alternative deterministic trajectory theory that displays similar particle interdependence yet is compatible with quantum predictions.
This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.
Access this article
Subscribe and save
- Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
- Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
- Cancel anytime
Buy Now
Price includes VAT (Japan)
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
J. T Cushing (1994) Quantum Mechanics: Historical Contingency and the Copenhagen Hegemony University of Chicago Press Chicago
A. Pais (1982) Subtle is the Lord. . . F The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein Clarendon Press Oxford
A. Fine (1986) The Shaky Game: Einstein, Realism and the Quantum Theory University of Chicago Press Chicago 98–99
D. Howard (1990) ‘‘‘Nicht sein kann was nicht sein darf’, or the prehistory of EPR, 1909–1935: Einstein’s early worries about the quantum mechanics of composite systems’‘ A. I. Miller (Eds) Sixty-Two Years of Uncertainty Plenum Press New York
D. W. Belousek (1996)ArticleTitle ‘‘Einstein’s1927 unpublished hidden-variable theory its background, context and significance’‘Stud. Hist. Phil. Mod. Phys27 437
L. P. Eisenhart (1966) Riemannian Geometry Princeton University Press Princeton
K. Prizbram (Eds) (1967) Letters on Wave Mechanics Vision Press London 23–24
R. Debever (Eds) (1979) Elie Cartan–-Albert Einstein: Letters on Absolute Parallelism Princeton University Press Princeton
M. Jammer (1974) The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics Wiley New York 164–165
M. Born (1971) The Born-Einstein Letters Macmillan London
Electrons et Photons. Rapports et Discussions du Cinquième Conseil de Physique, 1927 (Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1928), pp. 255–256 (English translation in: Niels Bohr Collected Works, J. Kalckar, ed. Vol 6, (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985), pp. 101–103).
P. R. Holland (2000) The Quantum Theory of Motion Cambridge University Press Cambridge
P. Holland C. Philippidis (2003)ArticleTitle‘‘Implications of Lorentz covariance for the guidance formula in two-slit quantum interference’‘Phys. Rev. A67 062105
P. R. Holland (1998)ArticleTitle‘‘New trajectory interpretation of quantum mechanics’‘Found. Phys.28 881
P. Holland (2001)ArticleTitle‘‘Hamiltonian Theory of Wave and Particle in Quantum Mechanics I, II’‘Nuovo Cimento B116 1043–1143
A. Einstein (1948)ArticleTitle‘‘Quantum mechanics and reality’‘Dialectica2 320
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Green College, University of Oxford, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6HG, England
Peter Holland
- Peter Holland
Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence toPeter Holland.
Additional information
PACS: 03.65.Bz.
Essay written in memory of J.T. Cushing.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Holland, P. What’s Wrong with Einstein’s 1927 Hidden-Variable Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics?.Found Phys35, 177–196 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-004-1940-7
Received:
Issue date:
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative