• Aalbers, M. B. (2005). Big Sister is watching you!: Gender interaction and the unwritten rules of the Amsterdam red-light district.Journal of Sex Research,42, 54–62.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Abbey, A., Zawacki, T., & McAuslan, P. (2001). Alcohol’s effects on sexual perception.Journal of Studies on Alcohol,61, 688–697.

  Google Scholar 

• Alexander, M. G., & Fisher, T. D. (2003). Truth and consequences: Using the bogus pipeline to examine sex differences in self-reported sexuality.Journal of Sex Research,40, 27–35.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• American Psychological Association Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls. (2007).Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Retrieved February 22, 2007 fromhttp://www.apa.org/pi/wpo/sexualization.html

• Andersen, B. L., & Cyranowski, J. M. (1994). Women’s sexual self-schema.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,67, 1079–1100.

  Google Scholar 

• Andersen, B. L., & Cyranowski, J. M. (1995). Women’s sexuality: Behavior, responses, and individual differences.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,63, 891–906.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Andersen, B. L., Cyranowski, J. M., & Aarestad, S. (2000). Beyond artificial, sex-linked distinctions to characterize female sexuality: Comment on Baumeister (2000).Psychological Bulletin,126, 380–384.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Aronson, R., Whitehead, T., & Baber, W. (2003). Challenges to masculine transformation among urban, low-income, African-American males.American Journal of Public Health,93, 732–741.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Athenstaedt, U., Haas, E., & Schwab, S. (2004). Gender role self-concept and gender-typed communication behavior in mixed-sex and same-sex dyads.Sex Roles,50, 37–52.

  Google Scholar 

• Ayler, B., & Dainton, M. (2004). Biological sex and psychological gender as predictors of routine and strategic relational maintenance.Sex Roles,50, 689–697.

  Google Scholar 

• Bakker, F., & Vanwesenbeeck, I. (Eds.). (2006). Seksuele gezondheid in Nederland 2006 [Sexual health in the Netherlands 2006]. RNG-studies 9. Delft: Eburon.

• Bancroft, J. (2003). [Review ofSexing the body: Gender politics and the construction of sexuality].Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 289–291.

  Google Scholar 

• Barnett, R., & Rivers, C. (2004).Same difference: How gender myths are hurting our relationships, our children, and our jobs. New York: Basic Books.

  Google Scholar 

• Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Gender differences in erotic plasticity.Psychological Bulletin,126, 347–374.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Baumeister, R. F., Catanese, K. R., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Is there a gender difference in strength of sex drive? Theoretical views, conceptual distinctions, and a review of relevant evidence.Personality and Social Psychology Review,5, 242–273.

  Google Scholar 

• Bremner, J. D. (1999). Does stress damage the brain?Biological Psychiatry,45, 795–805.

  Google Scholar 

• Burman, E. (2005). Contemporary feminist contributions to debates around gender and sexuality: From identity to performance.Group Analysis,38, 17–30.

  Google Scholar 

• Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation.Psychological Review,106, 676–713.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Butler, J. (1990).Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Butler, J. (1993).Bodies that matter: On the discursive limitations of “sex”. New York: Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Cameron, D. (2005). Language, gender, and sexuality: Current issues and new directions.Applied Linguistics,26, 482–502.

  Google Scholar 

• Carpenter, D., Janssen, E., Graham, C., Vorst, H., & Wicherts, J. (2008). Women’s scores on the Sexual Inhibition/Sexual Excitation Scales (SIS/SES): Gender similarities and differences.Journal of Sex Research,45, 36–48.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Cole, E. R., Epstein Jayaratne, T., Cecchi, L. A., Feldbaum, M., & Petty, E. M. (2007). Vive la difference? Genetic explanations for perceived gender differences in nurturance.Sex Roles,57, 211–222.

  Google Scholar 

• Connell, R. W. (1985). Theorising gender.Sociology,19, 260–272.

  Google Scholar 

• Cooper, M. L., Shapiro, C. M., & Powers, A. M. (1998). Motivations for sex and risky sexual behavior among adolescents and young adults: A functional perspective.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,75, 1528–1558.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Crawford, M., & Fox, A. (2007). From sex to gender and back again: Co-optation of a feminist language reform.Feminism & Psychology,17, 481–486.

  Google Scholar 

• Crawford, M., & Popp, D. (2003). Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research.Journal of Sex Research,40, 13–26.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Cubbins, L. A., & Tanfer, K. (2000). The influence of gender on sex: A study of men’s and women’s self-reported high-risk sex behavior.Archives of Sexual Behavior,29, 229–257.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior.Psychological Review,94, 369–389.

  Google Scholar 

• Diekman, A. B. (2007). Negotiating the double bind: Interpersonal and instrumental evaluations of dominance.Sex Roles,22, 551–561.

  Google Scholar 

• Durant, L. E., & Carey, M. P. (2000). Self-administered questionnaires versus face-to-face interviews in assessing sexual behavior in young women.Archives of Sexual Behavior,29, 309–322.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Durant, L. E., & Carey, M. P. (2002). Reliability of retrospective self-reports of sexual and nonsexual health behaviors among women.Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy,28, 331–338.

  Google Scholar 

• Dworkin, S. L., & O’Sullivan, L. (2005). Actual versus desired initiation patterns among a sample of college men: Tapping disjunctures within traditional male sexual scripts.Journal of Sex Research,42, 150–158.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Eagly, A. H., & Diekman, A. B. (2005). What is the problem? Prejudice as an attitude-in- context. In J. F. Dovidio, P. Glick, & L. A. Rudman (Eds.),On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 19–35). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

  Google Scholar 

• Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles.American Psychologist,54, 408–423.

  Google Scholar 

• Fausto-Sterling, A. (2000).Sexing the body: Gender politics and the construction of sexuality. New York: Basic Books.

  Google Scholar 

• Fischtein, D. S., Herold, E. S., & Desmarais, S. (2007). How much does gender explain in sexual attitudes and behaviors? A survey of Canadian adults.Archives of Sexual Behavior,36, 451–461.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Fisher, T. D. (2007). Sex of experimenter and social norm effects on reports of sexual behavior in young men and women.Archives of Sexual Behavior,36, 89–100.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Fisher, T. D., & Walters, A. S. (2003). Variables in addition to gender that help to explain differences in perceived sexual interest.Psychology of Men & Masculinity,4, 154–162.

  Google Scholar 

• Frank, K. (2003). “Just trying to relax”: Masculinity, masculinizing practices, and strip club regulars.Journal of Sex Research,40, 61–76.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory: Towards understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health.Psychology of Women Quarterly,21, 173–206.

  Google Scholar 

• Garcia, L. T., & Carrigan, D. (1998). Individual and gender differences in sexual self-perceptions.Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality,10, 59–70.

  Google Scholar 

• Gardner, C. B. (1980). Passing by: Street remarks, address rights, and the urban female.Sociological Inquiry,50, 328–356.

  Google Scholar 

• Gebhardt, W. A., Kuyper, L., & Dusseldorp, E. (2006). Condom use at first intercourse with a new partner in female adolescents and young adults: The role of cognitive planning and motives for having sex.Archives of Sexual Behavior,35, 217–225.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Geer, J. H., & Manguno, G. M. (1997). Gender differences in cognitive processes in sexuality.Annual Review of Sex Research,9, 90–124.

  Google Scholar 

• Geer, J. H., & Robertson, G. G. (2005). Implicit attitudes in sexuality: Gender differences.Archives of Sexual Behavior,34, 671–677.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Gillath, O., Mikulincer, M., Birnbaum, G. E., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Does subliminal exposure to sexual stimuli have the same effect for men and women?Journal of Sex Research,44, 111–121.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Goffman, E. (1967).Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York: Pantheon Books.

  Google Scholar 

• Greene, K., & Faulkner, S. L. (2005). Gender, belief in the sexual double standard, and sexual talk in heterosexual dating relationships.Sex Roles,53, 239–251.

  Google Scholar 

• Hill, D. R. (2007). Differences and similarities in men’s and women’s sexual self-schemas.Journal of Sex Research,44, 135–144.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Hines, D. A. (2007). Predictors of sexual coercion against women and men: A multilevel, multinational study of university students.Archives of Sexual Behavior,36, 403–422.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis.American Psychologist,60, 581–592.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Hyde, J. S., & Durik, A. M. (2000). Gender differences in erotic plasticity-evolutionary or sociocultural forces? Comment on Baumeister (2000).Psychological Bulletin,126, 375–379.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Impett, E. A., & Peplau, L. A. (2003). Sexual compliance: Gender, motivational, and relationship perspectives.Journal of Sex Research,40, 87–100.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Impett, E. A., Schooler, D., & Tolman, D. L. (2006). To be seen and not heard: Femininity ideology and adolescent girls’ sexual health.Archives of Sexual Behavior,35, 131–144.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Ingraham, C. (1996). The heterosexual imaginary. In S. Seidman (Ed.),Queer theory/sociology (pp. 168–193). Oxford: Blackwell.

  Google Scholar 

• Jackson, S. (2006). Gender, sexuality and heterosexuality: The complexity (and limits) of heteronormativity.Feminist Theory,7, 105–121.

  Google Scholar 

• Jackson, S. M., & Cram, F. (2003). Disrupting the sexual double standard: Young women’s talk about heterosexuality.British Journal of Social Psychology,42, 113–127.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Janssen, E., Everaerd, W., Spiering, M., & Janssen, J. (2000). Automatic processes and the appraisal of sexual stimuli: Towards an information processing model of sexual arousal.Journal of Sex Research,37, 8–23.

  Google Scholar 

• Johnston, C. A. B., & Morrison, T. G. (2007). The presentation of masculinity in everyday life: Contextual variations in the Masculine behavior of young Irish men.Sex Roles,57, 661–674.

  Google Scholar 

• Kalichman, S., Simbayi, L. C., Kaufman, M., Cain, D., Cherry, C., Jooste, S., et al. (2005). Gender attitudes, sexual violence, and HIV/AIDS risk among men and women in Cape Town, South Africa.Journal of Sex Research,42, 299–306.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Kashak, E., & Tiefer, L. (Eds.). (2001).A new view of women’s sexual problems. New York: The Haworth Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Kiefer, A. K., & Sanchez, D. T. (2007a). Scripting sexual passivity: A gender role perspective.Personal Relationships,14, 269–290.

  Google Scholar 

• Kiefer, A. K., & Sanchez, D. T. (2007b). Men’s sex-dominance inhibition: Do men automatically refrain from sexually dominant behavior?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,33, 1617–1631.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Knudson-Martin, C., & Laughlin, M. J. (2007). Gender and sexual orientation in family therapy: Toward a postgender approach.Family Relations,54, 101–115.

  Google Scholar 

• Laan, E., van Stegeren, A., Scholte, S., & van Lunsen, R. (2007). Genderverschillen en- overeenkomsten in de seksuele respons [Gender differences and similarities in sexual response].Tijdschrift voor Seksuologie,31, 113–118.

  Google Scholar 

• Levesque, M. J., Nave, C. S., & Lowe, C. A. (2006). Toward an understanding of gender differences in inferring sexual interest.Psychology of Women Quarterly,30, 150–158.

  Google Scholar 

• Lucke, J. (1998). Gender roles and sexual behavior among young women.Sex Roles,39, 273–297.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Mahalik, J. R., Aldarondo, E., Gilbert-Gokhale, S., & Shore, E. (2005). The role of insecure attachment and gender role stress in predicting controlling behaviors in men who batter.Journal of Interpersonal Violence,20, 617–631.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Malamuth, N. M. (2003). Criminal and non-criminal sexual aggressors. Integrating psychopathy in a hierarchical mediational confluence model. In R. A. Prentky, E. S. Janus, & M. C. Seto (Eds.),Sexually coercive behavior understanding and management (pp. 33–58). New York: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

  Google Scholar 

• Matthiesen, S., & Hauch, M. (2004). Verschwinden die Geschlechtsunterschiede? Auflösung, Umkehr oder Kontinuität traditioneller Geschlechtsunterschiede im sexuellen Verhalten [Will gender differences disappear? Dissolution, reversal, or continuity of traditional gender differences in sexual behaviour].Verhaltenstherapie & Psychosoziale Praxis,36, 491–508.

  Google Scholar 

• McCall, K. M., Rellini, A. H., Seal, B. N., & Meston, C. M. (2007). Sex differences in memory for sexually-relevant information.Archives of Sexual Behavior,36, 508–517.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• McCarthy, B. W., & Bodhar, L. E. (2005). The equity model of sexuality: Navigating and negotiating the similarities and differences between men and women in sexual behavior, roles and values.Sexual and Relationship Therapy,20, 225–235.

  Google Scholar 

• McCarthy, E. (2007, August).Cellular events during development that determine adult sexual behavior in a rodent animal model. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Academy of Sex Research, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

• McCormick, N. B., Brannigan, G. G., & LaPlante, M. N. (1984). Social desirability in the bedroom: Role of approval motivation in sexual relationships.Sex Roles,11, 303–314.

  Google Scholar 

• McKenzie-Mohr, D., & Zanna, M. P. (1990). Treating women as sexual objects: Look to the (gender schematic) male who has viewed pornography.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,16, 296–308.

  Google Scholar 

• McPhail, B. A. (2004). Questioning gender and sexuality binaries: What queer theorists, transgendered individuals, and sex researchers can teach social work.Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services,17, 3–21.

  Google Scholar 

• Meston, C. M., & Buss, D. M. (2007). Why humans have sex.Archives of Sexual Behavior,36, 477–507.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Meston, C. M., Heiman, J. R., Trapnell, P. D., & Paulhus, D. L. (1998). Socially desirable responding and sexuality self-reports.Journal of Sex Research,35, 148–157.

  Google Scholar 

• Moi, T. (2005).Sex, gender and the body. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Muňoz-Laboy, M., Weinstein, H., & Parker, R. (2007). The Hip-Hop club scene: Gender, grinding and sex.Culture, Health & Sexuality,9, 615–628.

  Google Scholar 

• Murnen, S. K., & Stockton, M. (1997). Gender and self-reported sexual arousal in response to sexual stimuli: A meta-analytic review.Sex Roles,37, 135–153.

  Google Scholar 

• Noll, J. G. (2008). Sexual abuse of children: Unique in its effects on development?Child Abuse & Neglect,32, 603–605.

  Google Scholar 

• O’Sullivan, L. F., & Byers, E. S. (1993). Eroding stereotypes: College women’s attempts to influence reluctant male sexual partners.Journal of Sex Research,30, 270–282.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Oliver, M. B., & Hyde, J. S. (1993). Gender differences in sexuality: A meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin,114, 29–51.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Parrott, D. J., & Zeichner, A. (2008). Determinants of anger and physical aggression based on sexual orientation: An experimental examination of hypermasculinity and exposure to male gender role violations.Archives of Sexual Behavior,37, 891–901.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Patrick, M. E., Maggs, J. L., & Abar, C. C. (2007). Reasons to have sex, personal goals, and sexual behavior during the transition to college.Journal of Sex Research,44, 240–249.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Peplau, L. A. (2003). Human sexuality: How do men and women differ?Psychological Science,12, 37–40.

  Google Scholar 

• Peplau, L. A., & Garnets, L. D. (2000). A new paradigm for understanding women’s sexuality and sexual orientation.Journal of Social Issues,56, 329–350.

  Google Scholar 

• Richardson, D. (2007). Patterned fluidities: (Re)Imagining the relationship between gender and sexuality.Sociology,41, 457–474.

  Google Scholar 

• Risman, B. J., & Schwartz, P. (Eds.). (1989).Gender in intimate relationships: A microstructural approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

  Google Scholar 

• Rohlinger, D. A. (2002). Eroticizing men: Cultural influences on advertising and male objectification.Sex Roles,46, 61–74.

  Google Scholar 

• Sanchez, D. T., Crocker, J., & Boike, K. R. (2005). Doing gender in the bedroom: Investing in gender norms and the sexual experience.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,31, 1445–1455.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Sanchez, D. T., & Kiefer, A. K. (2007). Body concerns in and out of the bedroom: Implications for sexual pleasure and problems.Archives of Sexual Behavior,36, 808–820.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Sanchez, D. T., Kiefer, A. K., & Ybarra, O. (2006). Sexual submissiveness in women: Costs for sexual autonomy and arousal.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,32, 512–524.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Sandfort, T. G. M. (2005). Sexual orientation and gender: Stereotypes and beyond.Archives of Sexual Behavior,34, 595–611.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Segal, L. (1994).Straight sex: The politics of pleasure. London: Virago Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Simons, J. S., & Carey, M. P. (2001). Prevalence of sexual dysfunction: Results from a decade of research.Archives of Sexual Behavior,30, 177–219.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Skeggs, B. (2004).Class, self, culture. London: Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Steer, A., & Tiggemann, M. (2008). The role of self-objectification in women’s sexual functioning.Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology,27, 205–225.

  Google Scholar 

• Tiefer, L. (1995).Sex is not a natural act, and other essays. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Tiefer, L. (2001). A new view of women’s sexual problems: Why new? Why now?The Journal of Sex Research,38, 89–96.

  Google Scholar 

• Tiegs, T. J., Perrin, P. B., Kaly, P. W., & Heesacker, M. (2007). My place or yours?: An inductive approach to sexuality and gender role conformity.Sex Roles,56, 449–456.

  Google Scholar 

• Tolman, D. L. (1999). Femininity as a barrier to positive sexual health for adolescent girls.Journal of the American Medical Women’s Association,54, 133–138.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Tolman, D. L., Striepe, M. I., & Harmon, T. (2003). Gender matters: Constructing a model of adolescent sexual health.Journal of Sex Research,40, 4–12.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• van Outsem, R. (2007). Sexually abusive behaviour in juveniles: Deviant and non-deviant pathways.Journal of Sexual Aggression,13, 169–179.

  Google Scholar 

• Vanwesenbeeck, I. (2005). Burnout among female indoor sex workers.Archives of Sexual Behavior,34, 627–639.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Vanwesenbeeck, I. (2008). Sexual violence and the MDGs.International Journal of Sexual Health,20, 25–50.

  Google Scholar 

• Vanwesenbeeck, I. (2009). The risks and rights of sexualization: An appreciative commentary on Lerum and Dworkin’s “Bad Girls Rule”.Journal of Sex Research,46, 268–270.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Ward, L. M., & Harrison, K. (2005). The impact of media use on girls’ beliefs about gender roles, their bodies, and sexual relationships: A research synthesis. In E. Cole & D. J. Henderson (Eds.),Featuring females: Feminist analyses of media (pp. 3–23). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

  Google Scholar 

• Weinhardt, L. S., Forsyth, A. D., Carey, M. P., Jaworski, B. C., & Durant, L. E. (1998). Reliability and validity of self-report measures of HIV-related sexual behavior: Progress since 1990 and recommendations for research and practice.Archives of Sexual Behavior,27, 155–180.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender.Gender & Society,1, 125–151.

  Google Scholar 

• Wood, W., Christensen, P. N., Hebl, M. R., & Rothgerber, H. (1997). Conformity to sex-typed norms, affect, and the self-concept.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,73, 523–535.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Young, I. M. (1990).Throwing like a girl and other essays in feminist philosophy and social theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Zurbriggen, E. L., & Sherman, A. M. (2007). Reconsidering “sex” and “gender”: Two steps forward, one step back.Feminism & Psychology,17, 475–480.

  Google Scholar 

Download references