• Adams R, Jeanrenaud S, Bessant J, Overy P, Denyer D, Metcalfe H (2012) Innovating for sustainability: a systematic review of the body of knowledge. Network for Business Sustainability, London

  Google Scholar 

• Alblas AA, Peters K, Wortmann JC (2014) Fuzzy sustainability incentives in new product development: an empirical exploration of sustainability challenges in manufacturing companies. Int J Oper Prod Manag 34(4):513–545

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bilotta GS, Milner AM, Boyd IL (2014) Quality assessment tools for evidence from environmental science. Environ Evid 3:14. doi:10.1186/2047-2382-3-14

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bossink BAG (2015) Demonstration projects for diffusion of clean technological innovation: a review. Clean Technol Environ Policy 17:1409–1427

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Callon M, Courtial JP, Laville F (1991) Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: the case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics 22(1):155–205

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Chen PC, Hung SW (2014) Collaborative green innovation in emerging countries: a social capital perspective. Int J Oper Prod Manag 3(3):347–363

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Chen C, Liu LQ (2014) Pricing and quality decisions and financial incentives for sustainable product design with recycled material content under price leadership. Int J Prod Econ 147(Part C):666–677. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.04.016

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cobo M, López-Herrera A, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F (2011) An approach for detecting, quantifying and visualizing the evolution of a research field: a practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. J Informetr 5(1):146–166

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cobo M, López-Herrera A, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F (2012) SciMAT: a new science mapping analysis software tool. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 63(8):1609–1630

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cooper HM (2010) Research synthesis and meta-analysis: a step-by-step approach, 4th edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

  Google Scholar 

• Cui JR, Forssberg E (2003) Mechanical recycling of waste electric and electronic equipment: a review. J Hazard Mater 99(3):243–263

  Article CAS  Google Scholar 

• Daly J, Willis K, Small R, Green J, Welch N, Kealy M, Hughes E (2007) A hierarchy of evidence for assessing qualitative health research. J Clin Epidemiol 60(1):43–49

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dangelico RM, Pontrandolfo P, Pujari D (2013) Developing sustainable new products in the textile and upholstered furniture industries: role of external integrative capabilities. J Prod Innov Manag 30(4):642–658

  Article  Google Scholar 

• De Benedetto L, Klemes J (2010) The environmental bill of material and technology routing: an integrated LCA approach. Clean Technol Environ Policy 12:191–196

  Article  Google Scholar 

• De Nooy W, Mrvar A, Batageli V (2005) Exploratory network analysis with Pajek. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Driessen PH, Hillebrand B, Kok RAW, Verhallen TMM (2013) Green new product development: the pivotal role of product greenness. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 60(2):315–326

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Elkington J (1994) Towards the sustainable corporation: win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. Calif Manag Rev 36(2):90–100. doi:10.2307/41165747

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gerstlberger W, Knudsen MP, Stampe I (2014) Sustainable development strategies for product innovation and energy efficiency. Bus Strategy Environ 23(2):131–144

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gmelin H, Seuring S (2014) Determinants of a sustainable new product development. J Clean Prod 69:1–9

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Graedel TE, Guth LA (1990) Impact of environmental issues on materials and processes. AT&T Tech J 69(6):129–140

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gungor A, Gupta SM (1999) Issues in environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery: a survey. Comput Ind Eng 36(4):811–853

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hirsch JE (2005) An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U. S. A. 102(46):16569–16572. doi:10.1073/pnas.0507655102

  Article CAS  Google Scholar 

• Huang YC, Wu YCJ (2010) The effects of organizational factors on green new product success: evidence from high-tech industries in Taiwan. Manag Decis 48(10):1539–1567

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ilgin MA, Gupta SM (2010) Environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery (ECMPRO): a review of the state of the art. J Environ Manag 91(3):563–591

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jia X, Li Z, Wang F, Qian Y (2015) Integrated sustainability assessment for chemical processes. Clean Technol Environ Policy. doi:10.1007/s10098-015-1075-x

  Google Scholar 

• Klemes JJ, Varbanov PS (2013) Process Intensification and Integration: an assessment. J Clean Technol Environ Policy 15:417–422. doi:10.1007/s10098-013-0641-3

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lambert AJD (2002) Determining optimum disassembly sequences in electronic equipment. Comput Ind Eng 43(3):553–575

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lambert AJD (2003) Disassembly sequencing: a survey. Int J Prod Res 41(16):3721–3759

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lee KH, Kim JW (2011) Integrating suppliers into green product innovation development: an empirical case study in the semiconductor industry. Bus Strategy Environ 20(8):527–538

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Linton JD, Klassen R, Jayaraman V (2007) Sustainable supply chains: an introduction. J Oper Manag 25(6):1075–1082

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mukerjee R, Sengupta D, Sikdar SK (2015) Sustainability in the context of process engineering. Clean Technol Environ Policy 17(4):833–840. doi:10.1007/s10098-015-0952-7

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Panaretos J, Malesios C (2009) Assessing scientific research performance and impact with single indices. Scientometrics 81(3):635–670

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pujari D (2006) Eco-innovation and new product development: understanding the influences on market performance. Technovation 26(1):76–85

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pujari D, Wright G, Peattie K (2003) Green and competitive—influences on environmental new product development performance. J Bus Res 56(8):657–671

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pujari D, Peattie K, Wright G (2004) Organizational antecedents of environmental responsiveness in industrial new product development. Ind Mark Manag 33(5):381–391

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ravi V, Shankar R, Tiwari MK (2005) Analysing alternatives in reverse logistics for end-of-life computers: ANP and balanced scorecard approach. Comput Ind Eng 48(2):327–356

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Reay T, Berta W, Kohn MK (2009) What’s the evidence on evidence-based management? Acad Manag Perspect 23(4):5–18

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schultmann F, Zumkeller M, Rentz O (2006) Modeling reverse logistic tasks within closed-loop supply chains: an example from the automotive industry. Eur J Oper Res 171(3):1033–1050

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sodhi MS, Reimer B (2001) Models for recycling electronics end-of-life products. Or Spektrum 23(1):97–115

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Srivastava SK (2007) Green supply-chain management: a state-of-the-art literature review. Int J Manag Rev 9(1):53–80

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sundin E, Bras B (2005) Making functional sales environmentally and economically beneficial through product remanufacturing. J Clean Prod 13(9):913–925

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Thomé AMT, Scavarda A (2015) A systematic literature review of design-manufacturing integration for sustainable products. Chem Eng Trans 45:691–696. doi:10.3303/CET1545116

  Google Scholar 

• Thomé AMT, Sousa R (2016) Design manufacturing integration and manufacturing complexity: a contingency investigation of job rotation and colocation. Int J Oper Prod Manag 36(10)

• Thomé AMT, Scavarda LF, Fernandez NS, Scavarda AJ (2012) Sales and operations planning: a research synthesis. Int J Prod Econ 138(1):1–13

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Thomé AMT, Scavarda LF, Scavarda A, Thomé FSS (2015) Similarities and contrasts of complexity, uncertainty, risks, and resilience in supply chains and temporary multi-organization projects. Int J Proj Manag. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.10.012

  Google Scholar 

• Thomé AMT, Scavarda LF, Scavarda A (2016) Conducting systematic literature review in operations management. Prod Plan Control. doi:10.1080/09537287.2015.1129464

  Google Scholar 

• Tsai MT, Chuang LM, Chao ST, Chang HP (2012) The effects assessment of firm environmental strategy and customer environmental conscious on green product development. Environ Monit Assess 184(7):4435–4447

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Valentine JC (2009) Judging the quality of primary research. In: Cooper H, Hedges LV, Valentine JC (eds) The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis, 2nd edn. Russel Sage Foundation, New York

  Google Scholar 

• Vinodh S (2011) Environmental conscious product design using CAD and CAE. Clean Technol Environ Policy 13(2):359–367. doi:10.1007/s10098-010-0310-8

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references