Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

On the Role of the Michelson–Morley Experiment: Einstein in Chicago

You have full access to thisopen access article

Archive for History of Exact Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article discusses new material, published in volume 12 of the Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, that addresses Einstein’s knowledge of the Michelson–Morley experiment prior to 1905: in a lecture in Chicago in 1921, Einstein referred to the experiment, mentioned when he came upon it and hinted at its influence. Arguments are presented to explain the contrast with Einstein’s later pronouncements on the role of the experiment.

Article PDF

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  • Abiko Seiya. (2000) Einstein’s Kyoto address: ‘How I created the theory of relativity’. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 31: 1–35

    Google Scholar 

  • CPAE 1: Stachel, John, et al. eds. 1987.The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, vol. 1. The early years, 1879–1902. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • CPAE 7: Janssen, Michel, et al. eds. 2002.The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, vol. 7. The Berlin Years: Writings, 1918–1921. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • CPAE 12: Buchwald, Diana Kormos, et al. eds. 2009.The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, vol. 12. The Berlin Years: Correspondence, January–December 1921. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Einstein Albert. (1905) Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper. Annalen der Physik 17: 891–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einstein Albert. (1907) Über das Relativitätsprinzip und die aus demselben gezogenen Folgerungen. Jahrbuch der Radioaktivität und Elektronik 4: 411–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, Albert. 1910. Le principe de relativité et ses conséquences dans la physique moderne.Archives des sciences physiques et naturelles 29: 5–28, 125–144.

  • Einstein Albert. (1922) Vier Vorlesungen über Relativitätstheorie gehalten im Mai 1921 an der Universtät Princeton. Vieweg, Braunschweig

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, Albert. 1922/1982. How I created the theory of relativity.Physics Today August: 45–47; translated by Yoshimasa A. Ono.

  • Einstein, Albert. 1949a. Autobiographisches. InAlbert Einstein: Philosopher–Scientist, ed. Paul A. Schilpp, 2–94. La Salle, IL: Open Court.

  • Einstein, Albert. 1949b. Reply to criticism. InAlbert Einstein: Philosopher–Scientist, ed. Paul A. Schilpp, 663–688. La Salle, IL: Open Court.

  • Hentschel Klaus. (1992) Einstein’s attitude towards experiments: Testing relativity theory: 1907–1927. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 23: 593–624

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Holton, Gerald. 1968/1995. Mach, Einstein and the search for reality.Daedalus 97: 636–673, 1968; see alsoThematic Origins of Scientific Thought, 237–277, 1995. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Holton, Gerald. 1969/1995. Einstein, Michelson, and the ‘crucial’ experiment.Isis 60: 133–197, 1969; see alsoThematic Origins of Scientific Thought, 279–370, 1995, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Illy, József. (eds) (2006) Albert Meets America. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Itagaki Ryoichi. (1999) Einstein’s “Kyoto lecture”: The Michelson–Morley experiment. Science 283: 1455

    Article MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, Michel, and Renn, Jürgen. 2007. Untying the knot: How Einstein found his way back to field equations discarded in the Zurich notebook. InThe genesis of general relativity, vol. 2, ed. Janssen, Michel et al., 839–925. Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Millikan Robert A. (1949) Albert Einstein on His Seventieth Birthday. Reviews of Modern Physics 21: 343–345

    Article MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Norton John D. (2000) ‘Nature is the realization of the simplest conceivable mathematical ideas’: Einstein and the canon of mathematical simplicity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 31: 135–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton John D. (2004) Einstein’s Investigations of Galilean Covariant Electrodynamics Prior to 1905. Archive for History of Exact Sciences 59: 45–105

    Article MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ogawa Tsuyoshi. (1979) Japanese Evidence for Einstein’s Knowledge of the Michelson–Morley Experiment. Japanese Studies in the History of Science 18: 73–81

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Renn, Jürgen, and Schulmann, Robert. eds. 1992.Albert Einstein and Mileva Marić. The love letters, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Rosenkranz, Ze’ev. 2009.“...und freue mich, dass es ein Fleckchen Erde geben soll, auf dem unsere Stammesbrüder keine Fremdlinge sein sollen.” The private and public aspects of Albert Einstein’s involvement in German Zionism, 1919–1933. Ph.D. Dissertation, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

  • Shankland Robert S. (1964) Michelson–Morley Experiment. American Journal of Physics 32: 16–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stachel, John. 1982/2002. Einstein and Michelson: the context of discovery and the context of justification.Astronomische Nachrichten 303: 47–53, 1982; see alsoEinstein from ‘B’ to ‘Z’, 177–190, 2002. Boston, Basel, Berlin: Birkhäuser.

  • Stachel, John. 1987/2002. Einstein and Ether Drift Experiments.Physics Today May: 45–47, 1987; see alsoEinstein from ‘B’ to ‘Z’, 171–176, 2002. Boston, Basel, Berlin: Birkhäuser.

  • van Dongen, Jeroen. 2002.Einstein’s unification: General relativity and the quest for mathematical naturalness. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.

  • van Dongen Jeroen. (2007) Emil Rupp, Albert Einstein and the canal ray experiments on wave-particle duality: Scientific fraud and theoretical bias. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 37(Supplement): 73–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wien, Wilhelm. 1898. Ueber die Fragen, welche die translatorische Bewegung des Lichtäthers betreffen.Annalen der Physik und Chemie 65(3): Beilage, i–xviii.

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am most grateful to Diana Kormos Buchwald for the suggestion to write this article and for very useful commentary of an earlier version. I also wish to thank Dennis Dieks, A.J. Kox, John Norton and Tilman Sauer for sharing their insight with me. Finally, I wish to thank Brenda Shorkend of the Einstein Papers Project and Harry Miller of the Wisconsin Historical Society for unearthing Einstein’s Chicago lectures.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for History and Foundations of Science and Descartes Centre, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Jeroen van Dongen

  2. Einstein Papers Project, Caltech, Pasadena, CA, USA

    Jeroen van Dongen

Authors
  1. Jeroen van Dongen

Corresponding author

Correspondence toJeroen van Dongen.

Additional information

Communicated by J.D. Norton.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp