13kAccesses
71Altmetric
8Mentions
Abstract
The environmental impacts of bottled water prompted us to explore drinking water choices at Purdue University, located in West Lafayette, IN. A random sample of 2,045 Purdue University students, staff, and faculty was invited to participate in an online survey. The survey assessed current behaviors as well as perceived barriers and benefits to drinking tap water versus bottled water. 677 surveys were completed for a response rate of 33.1%. We then conducted qualitative interviews with a purposive sample of university undergraduates (n = 21) to obtain contextual insights into the survey results and the beliefs of individuals with a variety of drinking water preferences. This study revealed that women drink disproportionately more bottled water then men while undergraduate students drink more than graduate students, staff and faculty. The study also uncovered a widespread belief that recycling eliminates the environmental impacts of bottled water. Important barriers to drinking tap water at Purdue include: perceived risks from tap water and the perceived safety of bottled water, preferring the taste of bottled water, and the convenience of drinking bottled water. The qualitative interviews revealed that drinking water choices can be influenced by several factors—especially whether individuals trust tap water to be clean—but involve varying levels of complexity. The implications of these results for social marketing strategies to promote tap water are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.
Access this article
Subscribe and save
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
Buy Now
Price includes VAT (Japan)
Instant access to the full article PDF.


Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anadu EC, Harding A (2000) Risk perception and bottled water use. Journal AWWA 92(11):82–92
Andreasen AR (1995) Marketing social change: changing behavior to promote health, social development, and the environment. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Arnold E, Larsen J (2006) Bottled water: pouring resources down the drain.http://www.earth-policy.org/index.php?/plan_b_updates/2006/update51. Accessed December 6, 2009
Bratt C (1999) The impacts of norms and assumed consequences on recycling behavior. Environment and Behavior 31(5):630–656
De Franca Doria M, Pidgeon N, Hunter P (2005) Perception of tap water risks and quality: a structural equation model approach. Water Science and Technology 52(8):143–149
Doria MF (2006) Bottled water versus tap water: understanding consumers’ preferences. Journal of Water and Health 4(2):271–276
Finucane ML, Slovic P, Mertz CK, Flynn J, Satterfield TA (2000) Gender, race and perceived risk: the ‘white male’ effect. Health, Risk & Society 2(2):159–172
Flynn J, Slovic P, Mertz CK (1994) Gender, race and perception of environmental risks. Risk Analysis 14(6):1101–1108
Foltz F (1999) Science, pollution, and clean drinking water: choosing between tap water, bottled water and home purification. Bulletin of Science. Technology and Society 19(4):300–309
Gleick PH (2010) Bottled & sold: the story behind our obsession with bottled water. Island Press, Washington
Gleick PH, Cooley HS (2009) Energy implications of bottled water. Environmental Research Letters 4:1–6
Godwin C, Responsible Purchasing Network (2008) Think outside the bottle: the responsible purchasing guide to bottled water alternatives.http://www.responsiblepurchasing.org/purchasing_guides/bottled_water/purchasing_guide.pdf. Accessed November 30, 2010
Hurd RE, AWWA-RF (American Water Works Association Research Foundation) (1993) Consumer attitude survey on water quality issues. AWWA, Denver
International Bottled Water Association (IBWA) (2010) Bottled water market share volume holds steady in 2009 despite poor economic conditions.http://www.bottledwater.org/news/bottled-water-market-share-volume-holds-steady-2009-despite-poor-economic-conditions. Accessed November 30, 2010
Jardine CG (2006) Improving communication of drinking water risks through a better understanding of public perspectives. Special Publication-Royal Society of Chemistry 302:172–183
Jardine CG, Gibson N, Hrudey SE (1999) Detection of odour and health risk perception of drinking water. Water Science and Technology 40(6):91–98
Kotler P, Lee NR (2008) Social marketing: influencing behaviors for good. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks
Lazo JK, Kinnell J, Bussa T, Fisher A, Collamer N (1999) Expert and lay mental models of ecosystems: inferences for risk communication. Risk: Health, Safety & Environment 10(1):45–64
Mckenzie-Mohr &Associates, Inc. (2010) Fostering sustainable behavior: community-based social marketing.http://www.cbsm.com. Accessed April 27, 2011
McKenzie-Mohr D, Smith W (1999) Fostering sustainable behavior: an introduction to community-based social marketing. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island
McSpirit S, Reid C (2011) Residents’ perceptions of tap water and decisions to purchase bottled water: a survey analysis from the appalachian, big sandy coal mining region of west Virginia. Society and Natural Resources 24:511–520
Morgan MG, Fischhoff B, Bostrom A, Atman CJ (2002) Risk communication: a mental models approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Parag Y, Roberts JT (2009) A battle against the bottles: building, claiming, and regaining tap-water trustworthiness. Society and Natural Resources 22:625–636
Purdue University Human Resource Services (2010) Purdue University Data Digest 2009-10. Accessed online November 30, 2010:http://www.purdue.edu/datadigest/pages/faculty/fac_race.htm
Purdue University Water Works (2010) Consumer confidence report: annual water quality report for the period of January 1 to December 31, 2009.http://www.purdue.edu/physicalfacilities/pdf/CCR_2010.pdf. Accessed November 30, 2010
QSR International (2007) NVivo 9 research software for analysis and insight.http://www.qsrinternational.com/products_nvivo.aspx. Accessed November 30, 2010
Rogers RW, Prentice-Dunn S, Gochman D (1997) Handbook of health behavior research 1: personal and social determinants. Plenum Press, New York, pp 113–132
Royte E (2008) Bottlemania: how water went on sale and why we bought it. Bloomsbury USA, New York
Schutt RK (2009) Investigating the social world: the process and practice of research. Pine Forge Press, Thousand Oaks
United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) (2009) Bottled water: FDA safety and consumer protections are often less stringent than comparable EPA protections for tap water.http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d09861t.pdf. Accessed November 30, 2010
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Dr. Hyunyi Cho for her assistance and advice in planning this study. This research was funded by the Department of Forestry and Natural Resources at Purdue University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, 195 Marsteller Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
Amber Saylor & Linda Stalker Prokopy
Department of GeoSpatial Services, St. Mary’s University of Minnesota, Winona, MN, USA
Shannon Amberg
- Amber Saylor
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Linda Stalker Prokopy
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Shannon Amberg
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence toLinda Stalker Prokopy.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saylor, A., Prokopy, L.S. & Amberg, S. What’s Wrong with the Tap? Examining Perceptions of Tap Water and Bottled Water at Purdue University.Environmental Management48, 588–601 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9692-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative