489Accesses
3Altmetric
Abstract
Computer-based simulation is one of the most valuable aids for manufacturing systems design, yet its use remains limited. The main reason for this is that current manufacturing systems are extremely complex and the user-friendly capabilities provided even by the most advanced simulation tools are not sufficient to cope with such complexity. On this basis, the paper explores the development of an improved tool to ease and speed up simulation modelling of complex manufacturing systems. A simulation interface, created and currently used at a major automotive manufacturer, is considered and a rigorous assessment of the extent to which this interface can support the simulation modelling process is provided. The paper evaluates the viability to use the interface as a basis for a general purpose simulation modelling tool capable of coping with any complex manufacturing systems, analyses its potential values, and proposes developments that can support the uptake of simulation techniques within the manufacturing industry.
This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.
Access this article
Subscribe and save
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
Buy Now
Price includes VAT (Japan)
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Klingstam P, Gullander P (1999) Overview of simulation tools for computer-aided production engineering. Comput Ind 38(2):173–186 doi:10.1016/S0166-3615(98)00117-1
Baines TS, Kay JM (2002) Human performance modelling as an aid in the process of manufacturing system design: a pilot study. Int J Prod Res 40(10):2321–2334 doi:10.1080/00207540210128198
Holst L, Bolmsjö G (2001) Simulation integration in manufacturing system development: a study of Japanese industry. Ind Manage Data Syst 101(7):339–356 doi:10.1108/EUM0000000005822
Banks J, Hugan JC, Lendermann P, McLean C, Page EH, Pedgen CD et al (2003) The future of the simulation industry. In: Chick S et al (ed) Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp 2033–2043
Robinson S (2005) Discrete-event simulation: from the pioneers to the present, what next? J Oper Res Soc 56(6):619–629 doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601864
Baines TS, Mason S, Siebers PO, Ladbrook J (2004) Humans: the missing link in manufacturing simulation. Simulation Modeling Practice and Theory 12(7–8):515–526 doi:10.1016/S1569-190X(03)00094-7
Cunha P, Dionisio J, Henriques E (2003) An architecture to support the manufacturing system design and planning. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 16(7–8):605–612 doi:10.1080/0951192031000115660
Banks J (1999) Introduction to simulation. In: Farrington PA et al (ed) Proceedings of the 1999 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp 7–13
Chung CA (2004) Simulation modelling handbook: a practical approach. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, USA
Carrie A (1998) Simulation of manufacturing systems. Wiley, New York
Carson JS II (2005) Introduction to modeling and simulation. In: Kuhl ME et al (ed) Proceedings of the 2005 winter simulation conference. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp 16–23
Banks J (2000) Introduction to simulation. In: Joines JA, Barton RR, Kang K, Fishwick PA (eds) Proceedings of the 2000 winter simulation conference. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp 9–16
Law AM (2005) How to build valid and credible simulation models. In: Kuhl ME et al (ed) Proceedings of the 2005 winter simulation conference, Piscataway, NJ, pp 24–32
Pidd M, Carvalho A (2006) Simulation software: not the same yesterday, today or forever. J Simulat 1(1):7–20 doi:10.1057/palgrave.jos.4250004
Robinson S (2004) Simulation: the practice of model development and use. Wiley, Chichester, UK
Hollocks BW (2004) Still simulating after all these years—reflections on 40 years in simulation. In: Brailsford SC, Oakshott L, Robinson S, Taylor SJE (eds) Proceedings of the 2004 operational research society simulation workshop. Operational Research Society, Birmingham, UK, pp 209–222
Seila AF (2001) Spreadsheet simulation.. In: Peters BA, Smith JS, Medeiros DJ, Rohrer MW (eds) Proceedings of the 2001 winter simulation conference. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp 74–78
Hlupic V, Paul RJ (1999) Guidelines for selection of manufacturing simulation software. IIE Trans 31(1):21–29
Bovone M, De Ferrari V, Manuelli R (1989) How to choose useful simulation software. Proceedings of the 1989 European Simulation Multiconference—SCS Simulation Computer Society, San Diego, pp. 39–43
Ekere NN, Hannam RG (1989) An evaluation of approaches to modelling and simulating manufacturing systems. Int J Prod Res 27(4):599–611 doi:10.1080/00207548908942571
Holder K (1990) Selecting simulation software. OR Insight 3(4):19–24
Davis L, Williams G (1994) Evaluating and selecting simulation software using the analytic hierarchy process. Integrated Manuf Syst 5(1):23–32 doi:10.1108/09576069410050314
International Organization for Standardization/International Electrotechnical Commission (2001) ISO/IEC 9126-1, Software engineering—product quality, Part 1: Quality in use metrics. Author, Geneva
International Organization for Standardization (1998) ISO 9241-11, Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs), Part 11: Guidance on usability. Geneva
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (1990) 610.12-1990, IEEE Standard glossary of software engineering terminology. Los Alamitos, CA
Kirakowski J, Corbett M (1993) SUMI: the Software measurement inventory. Br J Educ Technol 24(3):210–214 doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.1993.tb00076.x
Lewis JR (1995) IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. Int J Hum Comput Interact 7(1):57–78
Macleod M, Bowden R, Bevan N, Curson I (1997) The MUSiC performance measurement method. Behav Inf Technol 16(4–5):279–293 doi:10.1080/014492997119842
Seffah A, Donyaee M, Kline RB (2006) Usability measurement and metrics: a consolidated model. Softw Qual J 14(2):159–178 doi:10.1007/s11219-006-7600-8
Abran A, Khelifi A, Suryn W (2003) Usability meanings and interpretations in ISO Standards. Softw Qual J 11(4):325–338 doi:10.1023/A:1025869312943
Holzinger A (2005) Usability engineering methods for software developers. Commun ACM 48(1):71–74 doi:10.1145/1039539.1039541
Zhang Z, Basili V, Shneiderman B (1999) Perspective-based usability inspection: an empirical validation of efficacy. Empir Softw Eng 4(1):43–69 doi:10.1023/A:1009803214692
Simeral EJ, Branghan RJ (1997) A comparative analysis of heuristic and usability evaluation methods. In: STC Proceedings 1997. Available online athttp://www.stc.org/confproceed/1997/PDFs/0140.PDF
Hornbaek K (2006) Current practice in measuring usability: challenges to usability studies and research. Int J Hum Comput Stud 64(2):79–102 doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.06.002
Robson C (2002) Real world research: a resource for social scientists and practitioners, 2nd edn. Blackwell, London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Department of Mechanical and Management Engineering, Politecnico di Bari, Viale Japigia, 182, Bari, Italy
Ornella Benedettini
Manufacturing Department, School of Applied Sciences, Cranfield University, Cranfield, Bedford, MK43 0AL, UK
Benny Tjahjono
- Ornella Benedettini
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Benny Tjahjono
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence toBenny Tjahjono.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Benedettini, O., Tjahjono, B. Towards an improved tool to facilitate simulation modelling of complex manufacturing systems.Int J Adv Manuf Technol43, 191–199 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1686-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative