Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Why friendly AIs won’t bethat friendly: a friendly reply to Muehlhauser and Bostrom

  • Curmudgeon Corner
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In “Why We Need Friendly AI”, Luke Muehlhauser and Nick Bostrom propose that for our species to survive the impending rise of superintelligent AIs, we need to ensure that they would be human-friendly. This discussion note offers a more natural but bleaker outlook: that in the end, if these AIs do arise, they won’t bethat friendly.

This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from ¥17,985 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Goertzel B (2012) Should humanity build a global AI nanny to delay the singularity until it’s better understood? J Conscious Stud 19(1–2):96–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Muehlhauser L, Bostrom N (2014) Why we need friendly AI. Think 13(36):41–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeifer R, Scheier C (1999) Understanding intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Restall G, Russell G (2010) Barriers to consequence. In: Pigden C (ed) Hume on is and ought. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 243–259

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Curmudgeon Corner

Curmudgeon Corner is a short opinionated column on trends in technology, arts, science and society, commenting on issues of concern to the research community and wider society. Whilst the drive for super-human intelligence promotes potential benefits to wider society, it also raises deep concerns of existential risk, thereby highlighting the need for an ongoing conversation between technology and society. At the core of Curmudgeon concern is the question: What is it to be human in the age of the AI machine? -Editor.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines

    Robert James M. Boyles

  2. Research Fellow, Center for Language Technologies, De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines

    Jeremiah Joven Joaquin

Authors
  1. Robert James M. Boyles
  2. Jeremiah Joven Joaquin

Corresponding author

Correspondence toRobert James M. Boyles.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boyles, R.J.M., Joaquin, J.J. Why friendly AIs won’t bethat friendly: a friendly reply to Muehlhauser and Bostrom.AI & Soc35, 505–507 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-019-00903-0

Download citation

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Jeremiah Joven JoaquinView author profile

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from ¥17,985 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Advertisement


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp