• Abood, K. A., S. G. Metzger, andD. F. Distante. 1999. Minimizing dredging disposal via sediment management in New York Harbor.Estuaries 22:763–769.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Acharya, G. andL. Bennett. 2001. Valuing open space and land-use patterns in an urban watershed.The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 22:221–237.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Beyers, W. andD. Lindahl. 1996. Lone eagles and high fliers in rural producer services.Rural Development Perspectives 11:2–10.

  Google Scholar 

• Billen, G., J. Garnier, A. Ficht, andC. Cun. 2001. Modeling the response of water quality in the Seine River estuary to human activity in its watershed over the last 50 years.Estuaries 24:977–993.

  Article CAS  Google Scholar 

• Brunson, M., L. Gilbert, B. Shindler, andE. Toman. 2002. Fire Conditions on Public Forests and Rangelands, A Survey of Citizens in Colorado's Estes Valley and Front Range Communities: Larimer and Boulder Counties. Joint fire Science Program, USDA Forest Service, U.S. Department of Interior, Corvallis, Oregon.

  Google Scholar 

• Cicin-Sain, B. andR. Knecht. 1998. Integrated Coastal and Ocean Management. Island Press, Washington, D.C.

  Google Scholar 

• Cortner, H. J. andM. A. Moote. 1999. The Politics of Ecosystem Management. Island Press, Washington, D.C.

  Google Scholar 

• Curran, S., A. Kumar, W. Lutz, andM. Williams. 2002. Interactions between coastal and marine ecosystems and human population systems: Perspectives on how consumption mediates this interaction.Ambio 4:264–268.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• DePhelps, C. 1996. Partnerships for preserving and enhancing the Padilla Bay agriculture/estuarine system.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 51:274–279.

  Google Scholar 

• Dillman, D. 1978. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. Wiley, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Geoghegan, J., L. Wainger, andN. Bockstael. 1997. Spatial landscape indices in a hedonic framework: An ecological economics analysis using GIS.Ecological Economics 23:251–264.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Good, J. W., J. W. Weber, andJ. W. Charland. 1999. Protecting estuaries and coastal wetlands through state coastal zone management programs.Coastal Management 27:139–186.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gregory, R. andK. Wellman. 2001. Bringing stakeholder values into environmental policy choices: A community-based estuary case study.Ecological Economics 39:37–52.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hanna, K. 1999. Integrated resouce management in the Fraser River estuary: Stakeholder's perceptions of the state of the river and pogram influence.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 54:490–498.

  Google Scholar 

• Huppert, D. D., A. M. Olson, M. J. Hershman, K. T. Wing, andC. M. Sweeney. 1998. Socioeconomic causes and consequences of coastal ecosystems changes, p. 39–89.In G. McMurray and R. Bailey (eds.), Change in Pacific Northwest Coastal Ecosystems. Proceedings of the Pacific Northwest Coastal Ecosystems Regional Study Workshop, August 13–14, 1996, Froutdale Oregon. Decision Analysis Series No. 11. NOAA Coastal Ocean Office, Silver Spring, Maryland.

  Google Scholar 

• Imperial, M. T. andT. Hennessey. 1996. An ecosystem-based approach to managing estuarine systems.Coastal Management 24:115–139.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jennings, T. andA. Jennings. 2001. Estuary Management in the PNCERS Study Areas: An Overview of Programs and Activities in Washington, Oregon, and North California. North Coast Consultants, Cannon Beach, Oregon.

  Google Scholar 

• Leschine, T. M., B. E. Ferriss, K. P. Bell, K. K. Bartz, S. MacWilliams, M. Pico, andA. K. Bennett. 2003. Challenges and strategies for better use of scientific information in the management of coastal estuaries.Estuaries 26:1189–1204.

  Google Scholar 

• McCreary, S. andM. Adams. 1995. Managing wetlands through advanced planning and permitting: The Columbia River estuary task force, p. 103–137.In E. Porter and D. Salvesen (eds.), Collaborative Planning for Wetlands and Wildlife, Island Press, Washington, D.C.

  Google Scholar 

• Ohman, D. 1999a. Restructuring and well-being in the nonmetropolitan Pacific Northwest.Growth and Change 30:161–170.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ohman, D. R. 1999b. Understanding change on the Oregon Coast: Restructuring and the meaning of property, nature, and development. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

  Google Scholar 

• Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Palmquist, R. B. 1991. Hedonic methods, p. 77–120.In J. B. Braden and C. D. Kolstad, (eds.), Measuring the Demand for Environmental Quality. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

  Google Scholar 

• Power, T. 1996. Lost Landscapes and Failed Economics: The Search for a Value of Place. Island Press, Washington, D.C.

  Google Scholar 

• Powers, D. A. andY. Xie. 2000. Statistical Methods for Categorical Data Analysis. Academic Press, San Diego, California.

  Google Scholar 

• Radtke, H. and S. Davis. 1999. Economic Description of Selected Coastal Oregon and Washington Counties. Prepared for the Pacific Northwest Coastal Ecosystems Regional Study. The Research Group, Corvallis, Oregon.

• Reichert, C. 2002. Returning and new Montana migrants: Socio-economic and motivational differences.Growth and Change 33:133–151.

  Google Scholar 

• Rasker, R. 1995. A New Home on the Range, Economic Realities in the Columbia River Basin. The Wilderness Society, Washington, D.C.

  Google Scholar 

• Rooney, B. 2000. A Tale of Three Counties. Oregon Labor Market Information System, Salem, Oregon.

  Google Scholar 

• Rosen, S. 1974. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition.Journal of Political Economy 82:34–55.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Shindler, B. andE. Toman. 2001. Citizen Survey of Forest Practices in the Blue Mountains. College of Forest Resources, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon.

  Google Scholar 

• Smith, C. L., J. D. Gilden, J. S. Cone, andB. S. Steel. 1997. Oregon Coastal Salmon Restoration: Views of Coastal Residents. Oregon Sea Grant, ORESU-S-91-001. Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon.

  Google Scholar 

• Smith, D. R., P. S. Pooler, B. L. Swan, S. F. Michels, W. R. Hall, P. J. Himchak, andM. J. Millard. 2002. Spatial and temporal distribution of horseshoe crab (Limulus polyphemus) spawning in Delaware Bay: Implications for monitoring.Estuaries 25:115–125.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wondolleck, J. M. andS. L. Yaffee. 2000. Making Collaboration Work: Lessons from Innovation in Natural Resource Management. Island Press, Washington, D.C.

  Google Scholar 

• Wright, A. andB. Shindler. 1999. Perspectives on Watershed Management: Knowledge and Opinions from the Lower South Santiam River, Crabtree Creek, and Thomas Creek Watersheds. Department of Forest Resources, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon.

  Google Scholar 

Sources of Unpublished Materials

• Radtke, H. andS. Davis. 1994. A demographic and economic description of the Oregon Coast. Prepared for the Oregon coastal Zone Management Association. The Research Group. Corvallis, Oregon.

  Google Scholar 

• Strickland, R. M. andD. J. Chasan. 1989. Coastal Washington: A synthesis of information. Washington Sea Grant Program, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

  Google Scholar 

• Tillamook Bay National Estuary Program. 1999. Restorning the Balance: Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan for Tillamook Bay, Oregon. Tillamook County Performance Partnership, Garibaldi, Oregon. http://www.co. tillamook.or.us/gov/estuary/TCPP/performance.html.

Download references