• Andrews, J., Livingston, K., Harnad, S., and Fischer, U. (in prep.) ‘Categorical Perception Induced by Learning’.

• Church, A. (1956),Introduction to Mathematical Logic, Princeton, Princeton University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Dietrich, E. (1990), ‘Computationalism’,Social Epistemology4, 135–154.

  Google Scholar 

• Fodor, J. A. (1975),The Language of Thought, New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.

  Google Scholar 

• Fodor, J. A., and Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1988), ‘Connectionism and Cognitive Architecture: A Critical Appraisal,Cognition28, 3–71.

  Google Scholar 

• Galton, A. (1990), ‘The Church-Turing Thesis: Its Nature and Status’,AISB Quarterly,74, 9–19.

  Google Scholar 

• Harnad, S. (1982), ‘Consciousness: An Afterthought’,Cognition and Brain Theory5, 29–47.

  Google Scholar 

• Harnad, S. (ed.) (1987),Categorical Perception: The Groundwork of Cognition, New York: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Harnad, S. (1989), ‘Minds, Machines and Searle’,Journal of Theoretical and Experimental Artificial Intelligence1, 5–25.

  Google Scholar 

• Harnad, S. (1990a), ‘The Symbol Grounding Problem’,Physica D42, 335–346.

  Google Scholar 

• Harnad, S. (1990b), ‘Against Computational Hermeneutics’, (Invited Commentary on Eric Dietrich's Computationalism),Social Epistemology4, 167–172.

  Google Scholar 

• Harnad, S. (1990c), ‘Lost in the Hermeneutic Hall of Mirrors’, (Invited Commentary on: Michael Dyer) Minds, Machines, Searle and Harnad.Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence2, 321–327.

  Google Scholar 

• Harnad, S. (1991), ‘Other Bodies, Other Minds: A Machine Incarnation of an Old Philosophical Problem’,Minds and Machines1, 43–54.

  Google Scholar 

• Harnad, S. (1992a), ‘Connecting Object to Symbol in Modeling Cognition’, in A. Clarke and R. Lutz (eds.),Connectionism in Context, Springer Verlag, Berlin.

  Google Scholar 

• Harnad, S. (1992b). ‘The Turing Test is not a Trick: Turing Indistinguishability is a Scientific Criterion’,SIGART Bulletin3(4), 9–10.

  Google Scholar 

• Harnad, S. (1993a), ‘Grounding Symbols in the Analog World with Neural Nets’,Think2(1), 12–78 (Special issue on “Connectionism versus Symbolism,” D. M. W. Powers and P. A. Flach, eds.).

  Google Scholar 

• Harnad, S. (1993b), ‘Artificial Life: Synthetic Versus Virtual’,Artificial Life III. Proceedings, Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity. Volume XVI.

• Harnad, S. (1993c), ‘Problems, Problems: The Frame Problem as a Symptom of the Symbol Grounding Problem’,PSYCOLOQUY4(34), frame-problem.11.

  Google Scholar 

• Harnad, S. (1993d), ‘Grounding Symbolic Capacity in Robotic Capacity’, in Steels, L. and R. Brooks (eds.),The “Artificial Life” route to “Artificial Intelligence”, Building Situated Embodied Agents. New Haven: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Harnad, S. (1994a), ‘The Origin of Words: A Psychophysical Hypothesis’, in Durham, W. and Velichkovsky, B. (eds.),Naturally Human: Origins and Destiny of Language, Muenster: Nodus Pub.

  Google Scholar 

• Harnad, S. (1994b), ‘Levels of Functional Equivalence in Reverse Bioengineering: The Darwinian Turing Test for Artificial Life’,Artificial Life1(3), 293–301.

  Google Scholar 

• Harnad, S., Hanson, S.J., and Lubin, J. (1991), ‘Categorical Perception and the Evolution of Supervised Learning in Neural Nets’, in D. W. Powers and L. Reeker (eds.) Working Papers of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Machine Learning of Natural Language and Ontology, pp. 65–74. (Presented at Symposium on Symbol Grounding: Problems and Practice, Stanford University, March 1991; also reprinted as Document D91-09, Deutsches Forschungszentrum fur Kuenstliche Intelligenz GmbH Kaiserslautern FRG).

• Harnad, S. Hanson, S.J., and Lubin, J. (1994), ‘Learned Categorical Perception in Neural Nets: Implications for Symbol Grounding, in V. Honavar and L. Uhr (eds.),Symbol Processors and Connectionist Network Models in Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Modelling: Steps Toward Principled Integration, pp. 191–206. Academic Press.

• Hayes, P., Harnad, S., Perlis, D., and Block, N. (1992), ‘Virtual Symposium on Virtual Mind’,Minds and Machines2, 217–238.

  Google Scholar 

• Nagel, T. (1974), ‘What is it Like to be a Bat?’,Philosophical Review83, 435–451.

  Google Scholar 

• Nagel, T. (1986), ‘The View From Nowhere, New York: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Newell, A. (1980), ‘Physical Symbol Systems’,Cognitive Science4, 135–83.

  Google Scholar 

• Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1984),Computation and Cognition, Cambridge MA: MIT/Bradford.

  Google Scholar 

• Searle, J. R. (1980), ‘Minds, Brains and Programs’,Behavioral and Brain Sciences3, 417–424.

  Google Scholar 

• Turing, A. M. (1964), ‘Computing Machinery and Intelligence’, inMinds and Machines, A. Anderson (ed.), Engelwood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.

  Google Scholar 

• Turing, A. M. (1990), ‘Mechanical Intelligence’ (D. C. Ince, ed.), North Holland, Amsterdam.

  Google Scholar 

Download references