94Accesses
8Citations
3 Altmetric
Summary
The bulk of arguments that focus on clean semantics and notational simplicity tend to favor uniting the function and value namespaces. In spite of this, there are those who hold strongly to a belief that a two-namespace system affords useful expressive power that they are unwilling to do without. In the end, practical considerations favor the status quo for Common Lisp. There are a large number of improvements beyond a single namespace that could be made to Common Lisp that would clean it up and simplify it. We feel that the time for such radical changes to Common Lisp has passed, and it is the job of future Lisp designers to take the lessons from Common Lisp and Scheme to produce an improved Lisp.
This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.
Access this article
Subscribe and save
- Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
- Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
- Cancel anytime
Buy Now
Price includes VAT (Japan)
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Abelson, H., and Sussman, G.J., with J. Sussman.Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1985.
Brooks, R.A., Gabriel, R.P., and Steele, G.L., Jr. S-1 Common Lisp Implementation, Proceedings of the 1982 ACM Symposium on Lisp and Functional Programming, Pittsburgh, PA, August 1982.
Digital Equipment Corporation.VAX LISP/VMS User's Guide. Maynard, MA, 1986.
Gabriel, R.P.Performance and Evaluation of Lisp Systems. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1985.
Halstead, R. MultiLisp, Proceedings of the 1984 ACM Symposium on Lisp and Functional Programming, August 1984.
Kohlbecker, E.E., Jr.Syntactic Extensions in the Programming Language Lisp. Ph.D. thesis, Indiana University, Bloomington, August 1986.
Lucid, Inc.Lucid Common Lisp Reference Manual for the VAX. Menlo Park, CA, 1986.
McCarthy, J., et al.Lisp 1.5 Programmer's Manual. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1965.
Padget, J., et al. Desiderata for the standardisation of LISP, Proceedings of the 1986 ACM Conference on Lisp and Functional Programming, Cambridge, MA, August 1986.
Pitman, K.M.The Revised Maclisp Manual (Saturday Evening Edition). LCS Technical Report 295, MIT, Cambridge, MA, May 1983.
Rees, J., and Clinger, W. (Eds.).Revised3Report on the Algorithmic Language Scheme. SIGPLAN Notices 21(12), September 1986.
Steele, G.L., Jr.,Common Lisp, The Language. Digital Press, Billerica, MA, 1984.
Steele, G.L., Jr., and Hillis, W.D. Connection Machine™ Lisp: Fine-Grained Parallel Symbolic Processing, Proceedings of the 1986 ACM Conference on Lisp and Functional Programming, Cambridge, MA, August 1986.
Sussman, G.J., and Steele, G.L., Jr.,SCHEME: An Interpreter for Extended Lambda Calculus. AI Memo 349, MIT, Cambridge, MA, December 1975.
Symbolics, Inc.MACSYMA Reference Manual. Cambridge, MA, 1986a.
Symbolics, Inc. Symbolics Common Lisp: Language concepts.Encyclopedia Symbolica Vol. 2A, pp. 296–297, Cambridge, MA, 1986b.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Lucid, Inc. and Stanford University, USA
Richard P. Gabriel
Symbolics, Inc., USA
Kent M. Pitman
- Richard P. Gabriel
Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar
- Kent M. Pitman
Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar
Additional information
This paper is an adaptation of a report produced for X3J13 by the authors, a technical working group engaged in standardizing Common Lisp for ANSI.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gabriel, R.P., Pitman, K.M. Endpaper: Technical issues of separation in function cells and value cells.Lisp and Symbolic Computation1, 81–101 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01806178
Issue date:
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative