598Accesses
86Citations
20 Altmetric
Abstract
The problem-solving skills of 30 Ph.D. scientists were compared to those of 15 conservative Protestant ministers. Of particular interest was the frequency with which these groups generated confirmatory (rather than disconfirmatory)experiments to test their hypotheses. Experimental results showed that—contrary to a popular assumption—the reasoning skills of the scientists were not significantly different from those of nonscientists. In this study, the ministers showed a longer latency to speculation and generated more experiments per hypothesis than did the scientists. These findings are discussed in terms of the psychology of the scientist.
This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.
Access this article
Subscribe and save
- Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
- Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
- Cancel anytime
Buy Now
Price includes VAT (Japan)
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Bacon, F.Novum organum. (original 1621). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1889.
Greenwald, A. G. Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis.Psychological Bulletin 1975,82 1–20.
Lakatos, I., & Musgrave, A. (Eds.),Criticism and the growth of knowledge. London: Cambridge University Press, 1970.
Mahoney, M. J.Cognition and behavior modification. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Ballinger, 1974.
Mahoney, M. J.Scientist as subject. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Ballinger, 1976.
Mitroff, I. I.The subjective side of science. New York: Elsevier, 1974.
Popper, K.Objective knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972.
Rokeach, M.The open and closed mind. New York: Basic Books, 1960.
Wason, P. C. On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1960,12 129–140.
Wason, P. C., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (Eds.),Thinking and reasoning. Baltimore: Penguin, 1968.
Wason, P. C., & Johnson-Laird, P. N.Psychology of reasoning. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1972.
Weimer, W. B.Psychology and the conceptual foundations of science. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, in press.
West, S. S. The ideology of academic scientists.IRE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1960, June, 54–62.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University, USA
Michael J. Mahoney & Bobby G. DeMonbreun
- Michael J. Mahoney
Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar
- Bobby G. DeMonbreun
Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mahoney, M.J., DeMonbreun, B.G. Psychology of the scientist: An analysis of problem-solving bias.Cogn Ther Res1, 229–238 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01186796
Issue date:
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
