1. J. Barwise and J. Perry.Situations and Attitudes. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1983.

   Google Scholar 

2. N. D. Belnap. How a computer should think. InContemporary Aspects of Philosophy, G. Ryle, ed. pp. 30–56. Oriel Press, Oxford, 1977.

   Google Scholar 

3. N. D. Belnap. A useful four-valued logic. InModern uses of Multiple-valued Logic, J. M. Dunn and G. Epstein, eds. pp. 8–37. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1977.

   Google Scholar 

4. J. C. Bigelow. Believing in semantics.Linguistics and Philosophy,2, 101–144, 1978.

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. T. Buge. Belief and synonymy.The Journal of Philosophy,75, 119–138, 978.

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. R. Carnap.Meaning an Necessity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 947. (2nd edn. with appendices 1956.)

   Google Scholar 

7. H.-N. Casteneda. Thinning and the structure of the world.Philosophia,4, 3–40, 1974.

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. A. Church. On Carnap’s analysis of statements of assertion and belief.Analysis,10, 97–99, 1950.

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. M. J. Cresswell. Hyperintensional logic.Studia Logica,34, 25–38, 1975.

   Article  Google Scholar 

10. M. J. Cresswell. Quotational theories of propositional attitudes.Journal of Philosophical Logic, 9, 17–40, 1980. Reprinted as Chapter 6 ofSemantical Essays: Possible Worlds and their Rivals, pp. 78–103. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. M. J. Cresswell. The autonomy of semantics. InProcesses, Beliefs, and Questions, S. Peters and E. Saarinen, eds. pp. 69–86. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

12. M. J. Cresswell.Structured Meanings: The Semantics of Propositional Attitudes, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

13. M. J. Cresswell and A. von Stechow. De re belief generalized.Lingusitics and Philosophy,5, 503–535, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. D. Davidson. On saying that. InWords and Objections, D. Davidson and K. J. J. Hintikka, eds. pp. 158–174. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1969.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

15. W. Edelberg. Propositions, circumstances, objects.Journal of Philosophcial Logic,23, 1–34, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

16. J. A. Fodor.The Language of Thought, Cornell, New York, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

17. J. A. Fodor. Propositional attitudes.The Monist,61, 501–523, 1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. B. C. van Fraassen. Propositional attitudes in weak pragmatics.Studia Logica,38, 365–374, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

19. K. Gödel. Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze derPrincipia Mathematica und verwandter System I.Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik,38, 173–198. (Translated by B. Meltzer with an introduction by R. B. Braithwaite, Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.)

    Google Scholar 

20. K. J. J. Hintikka.Knowledge and Belief, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1962

    Google Scholar 

21. K. J. J. Hintikka. Knowledge, belief and logical consequence.Ajatus,32, 32–47, 1970. Reprinted in [Hintikka, 1975, pp. 179–191].

    Google Scholar 

22. K. J. J. Hintikka.The Intentions of Intentionality and Other New Models for Modalities, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1975.

    Book  Google Scholar 

23. K. J. J. Hintikka.Logic, Language Games and Information. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

24. K. J. J. Hintikka. Impossible possible worlds vindicated.Journal of Philosophical Logic, bf 4, 475–484, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. D. Kaplan. Quantifying in. InWords and Objections, D. Davidson and K. J. J. Hintikka, eds. pp. 206–242. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1969.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

26. D. Kaplan. On the logic of demonstratives.Journal of Philosophical Logic,8, 81–98, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

27. J. J. Katz.Semantic Theory. Harper and Row, New York, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

28. E. H. Klein. On sentences which report beliefs, desires and other mental attitudes. PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

29. S. A. Kripke. Naming and necessity. InSemantics of Natural Language, D. Davidson and G. H. Harman, eds, pp 253–355. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1972.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

30. C. I. Lewis.A Survey of Symbolic Logic. University of California Press, Berkeley, 1918.

    Google Scholar 

31. D. K. Lewis. General semantics.Synthese,22, 18–67, 1970. (Reprinted inSemantics of Natural Language, D. Davidson and G. H. Harman, eds. pp. 169–218, D. Reidel, Dordrecht and also in [Partee, 1979, pp. 1–50].)

    Article  Google Scholar 

32. D. K. Lewis. Attitudes de dicto and de se.Philosophical Review,8, 513–43, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

33. B. Mates. Synonymity.University of California Publications in Philosophy,25, 201–226, 1950. (Reprinted inSemantics and the Philosophy of Language, L. Linsky, ed. pp. 111–136. University of Illinois Press, 1952.)

    Google Scholar 

34. R. M. Montague. Syntactical treatments of modality.Acta Philosophica-Fennica, Modal and Many-valued Logics, 153–155, 1963. (Reprinted in [Montague, 1974, pp. 286–302].)

    Google Scholar 

35. R. M. Montague.Formal Philosophy. In R. H. Thomason, ed. Yale University Press, New Haven, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

36. R. C. Moore and G. G. Hendrix. Computational models of beliefs and the semantics of belief sentences. InProcesses, Beliefs and Questions, P. S. Peters and E. Soarinen, eds. pp. 107–127. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1982.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

37. T. Parsons. A Prolegomenon to Melinongian semantics.Journal of Philosophy,71, 561–580, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

38. B. H. Partee. The semantics of belief sentences. InApproaches to Natural Language, K. J. J. Hintikka, J. M. E. Moravcsik and P. Suppes, eds. pp. 309–336. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1973.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

39. B. H. Partee, ed.Montague Grammar, Academic Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

40. B. H. Partee. Semantics: Mathematics or Psychology?Semantics from Different Points of View, R. Bäuerle, U. Egli and A. von Stechow. pp. 1–14. Springer, Berlin, 1979.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

41. H. Putnam. The meaning of ‘meaning’. InLanguage, Mind and Knowledge, K. Gunderson, ed. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 7, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1975. Reprinted inMind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers Vol 2, pp. 215–271. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

42. W. V. O. Quine. Reference and modality. InFrom a Logical Point of View, pp. 139–159,, 2nd edn, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

43. W. V. O. Quine. Quantifiers and propositional attitudes.The Journal of Philosophy,53, 177–187, 1956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

44. W. V. O. Quine.Word and Object, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

45. V. Rantala. Urn models: A new kind of non-standard model for first-order logic.Journal of Philosophical Logic,4, 455–474, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

46. F. Recanati.Oratio Obliqua, Oratio Recta. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

47. A. L. Reeves. In defence of a simple solution.Australasian Journal of Philosophy,51, 17–38, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

48. N. Rescher.A Theory of Possibility. Blackwell, Oxford, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

49. M. Richard.Propositional Attitudes: An Essay on Thoughts and how we Ascribe Them. CUP, Cambridge, 1990.

    Book  Google Scholar 

50. B. A. W. Russell.The Problems of Philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1912.

    Google Scholar 

51. B. A. W. Russell.The Analysis of Mind. George Allen and Unwin, London, 1921.

    Google Scholar 

52. B. A. W. Russell.An Enquiry into Meaning and Truth. George Allen and Unwin, London, 1940.

    Google Scholar 

53. N. Salmon and S. Soames, eds.Propositions and Attitudes, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

54. A. F. Smullyan. Modality and description.The Journal of Symbolic Logic,13, 31–37, 1948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

55. S. Soames. Direct reference, propositional attitudes and semantic content.Philosophical Topics,15, 27–87, 1987. Reprinted in [Salmon and Soames, 1988, pp. 197–239].

    Article  Google Scholar 

56. R. C. Stalnaker. Propositions. InIssues in the Philosophy of Language, A. F. Makay and D. Merill, eds. pp. 79–91. Yale University Press, New Haven, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

57. R. C. Stalnaker. Assertion. InSyntax and Semantics, Vol 9, P. Cole, ed. pp. 315–332. Academic Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

58. R. C. Stalnaker.Inquiry, Bradford Books, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

59. A. Tarski. Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den formalisierten Sprachen.Studia Philosophica,1, 261–405, 1935. Translated inLogic, Semantics and Metamathematics, pp. 151–278, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

60. R. H. Thomason. Indirect discourse is not quotational.The Monist,60, 340–354, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

61. R. H. Thomason. A model theory for propositional attitudes.Linguistics and Philosophy,4, 47–70, 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

62. R. H. Thomason. A note on syntactical treatments of modality.Synthese,44, 391–395, 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

63. A. N. Whitehead and B. A. W. Russell.Principia Mathematical Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1910. 3 volumes, 1st edition 1910–1913, second edition 1923–1927.

    Google Scholar 

Download references