• Bertrand, Joseph. 1883. “Compte Rendu.”Journal des Savants (**):499–508.

  Google Scholar 

• Black, R.D.C.; Coats, A.R.; and Goodwin, C., eds. 1973.The Marginal Revolution in Economics. Durham: Duke University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Boninsegni, P. 1903. “Un Nuovo Tratto D’Economia Mathematica.”Giornali degli Economisti 30: 327–336.

  Google Scholar 

• Bouvier, Emile. 1901a. “L’Economie Politique Mathématique.”Revue Critique de Legislation et de Jurisprudence 30: 623–629.

  Google Scholar 

• Bouvier, Emile. 1901b. “La Méthode Mathématique en Economie Politique.”Revue D’Economie Politique 15: 817–850.

  Google Scholar 

• Debreu, Gerard. 1984. “Economics in a Mathematical Mode.”American Economic Review 74: 267–278.

  Google Scholar 

• Etner, F. 1986. “L’Enseignement Economique dans les Grandes Ecoles.”Economies et Sociétés 20: 159–173.

  Google Scholar 

• Giedymin, Jerzy. 1982.Science and Convention. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Jaffe, William. 1983. Donald Walker, ed.Essays on Walras. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Laurent, Hermann. 1870.Traité de Mécanique Rationelle. Paris: Gauther-Villars.

  Google Scholar 

• Laurent, Hermann. 1902.Petit Traité d’Economie Politique Mathématique. Paris: Schmid.

  Google Scholar 

• Markus, Gyorgy. 1987. “Why is There No Hermeneutics of Natural Science?”Science in Context 1: 5–54.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• McCloskey, Donald. 1985.The Rhetoric of Economics. Madison: University of Wiscons in Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Menard, Claude. Forthcoming 1988. “The Machine and the Heart.”Social Concept.

  Google Scholar 

• Mirowski, Philip. 1984. “Physics and the Marginalist Revolution.”Cambridge Journal of Economics 8: 361–379.

  Google Scholar 

• Mirowski, Philip. 1987. “Shall I Compare Thee to a Minkowski-Ricardo-LeontiefMetzler Matrix of the Mosak-Hicks Type?”Economics and Philosophy 3: 67–95.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mirowski, Philip. 1988.Against Mechanism. Totawa, N.J.: Rowman and Littlefield.

  Google Scholar 

• Mirowski, Philip. Forthcoming.More Heat Than Light. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Picard, Charles. 1908.La Science Moderne et son état actuel. Paris: Flammarion.

  Google Scholar 

• Poincaré, Henri. 1952.Science and Hypothesis. New York: Dover.

  Google Scholar 

• Poinsot, Louis. 1842.Eléments de Statique. Eighth edition. Paris: Bachelier.

  Google Scholar 

• Schumpeter, Joseph. 1954.A History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Walker, Donald. 1987. “Walras’ Theories of Tâtonnement.”Journal of Political Economy 95: 758–774.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Walras, Leon. 1909. “Economique et Mécanique.”Bulletin de la Société Vaudoise de Sciences Naturelles 45: 313–325.

  Google Scholar 

• Walras, Leon. 1965. William Jaffe, ed.Correspondence and Papers. 3 vols. Amsterdam: North Holland.

  Google Scholar 

• Walras, Leon. 1969.Elements of Pure Economics. Translated by William Jaffe. New York: Kelley.

  Google Scholar 

• Weintraub, E.R. 1985.General Equilibrium Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Zoretti, Ludovic. 1906. “La Méthode Mathématique et les Sciences Sociales.”Revue du Mois 2: 355–365.

  Google Scholar 

• Beardsley, Monroe C. 1969. “Metaphor.” In Paul Edwards, ed.The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. New York: Collier-Macmillan, pp. 284–289.

  Google Scholar 

• Black, R.D. Collison. 1972. “W.S. Jevons and the Foundation of Modern Economics.”History of Political Economy 4: 364–378.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Boyd, Richard. 1979. “Metaphor and Theory Change: What is ‘Metaphor’ a Metaphor For?” In Andrew Ortony, ed.Metaphor and Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 356–407.

  Google Scholar 

• Cohen, J. Bernard. 1985.Revolution in Science. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap.

  Google Scholar 

• Feiwel, George R. 1987.Arrow and the Ascent of Modern Economic Theory. New York: New York University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Gentner, Dedre. 1983. “Structure Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy.”Cognitive Science 7: 155–170.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hahn, Frank. 1984.Equilibrium and Macroeconomics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

  Google Scholar 

• Hesse, Mary B. 1966.Modern and Analogies in Science. Notre Dame, Ind: University of Notre Dame.

  Google Scholar 

• Hesse, Mary B. 1974.The Structure of Scientific Inference. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Holton, Gerald and Roller, Duane. 1958.Foundations of Modern Physical Science. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.

  Google Scholar 

• Jevons, W.S. 1920/1877.The Principles of Science. London: Macmillan.

  Google Scholar 

• Jevons, W.S. 1879/1965.The Theory of Political Economy. New York: Kelley.

  Google Scholar 

• Jevons, W.S. 1977a. R.D. Collison Black, ed.Papers and Correspondence of William Stanley Jevons. Volume I II. London: Macmillan.

  Google Scholar 

• Jevons, W.S. 1977h. R.D. Collison Black, ed.Papers and Correspondence of William Stanley Jevons. Volume I V. London: Macmillan.

  Google Scholar 

• Kargon, Robert. 1969. “Model and Analogy in Victorian Science: Maxwell’s Critique of the French Physicists.”Journal of the History of Ideas 30: 423–436.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lakatos, Imre. 1970. “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.” In Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave, eds.Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 91–196.

  Google Scholar 

• Magnus, Phillips. 1876Lessons on Elementary Mechanics. New York: Wiley.

  Google Scholar 

• Mirowski, Philip. 1984a. “Physics and the `Marginalist Revolution.”’Cambridge Journal of Economics 8: 361–379.

  Google Scholar 

• Mirowski, Philip. 1984b. “The Role of Conservation Principles in Twentieth-Century Economic Theory.”Philosophy of the Social Sciences 14: 461–473.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mirowski, Philip. Forthcoming.More Heat Than Light. Oxford and New York: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Samuelson, Paul. 1950. “The Problem of Integrability in Utility Theory”Economica 17: 355–385.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Weintraub, E. Roy. 1980.Microfoundations. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Wulwick, Nancy J. 1989. “Phillips’ Approximate Regression.”Oxford Economic Papers, 41: 170–88.

  Google Scholar 

Download references