• Ambrose, J. D., 1980, A re-evaluation of the Melanthoideae (Liliaceae) using numerical analyses, in:Petaloid Monocotyledons (C. D. Brickellet al., eds.), PP. 65–81, Academic, London.

  Google Scholar 

• Ancibor, E., 1979, Systematic anatomy of vegetative organs of the Hydrocharitaceae,Bot. J. Linn. Soc.78:237–266.

  Google Scholar 

• Arber, A., 1925,Monocotyledons. A Morphological Study, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  Google Scholar 

• Ashlock, P. D., 1971, Monophyly and associated terms,Syst. Zool.20:63–69.

  Google Scholar 

• Ashlock, P. D., 1974, The uses of cladistics,Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.5:81–99.

  Google Scholar 

• Barthlott, W., and Fröhlich, D., 1983, Micromorphologie und Orientierungs-Muster epi-cuticularer Wachs-Kristalloide: Ein neues systematisches Merkmal bei Monocotylen,Plant Syst. Evol. (in press).

  Google Scholar 

• Behnke, H.-D., 1968, Zum Feinbau der Siebröhren-Plastiden bei Monocotylen,Naturwissenschaften55:120–141.

  Google Scholar 

• Behnke, H.-D., 1971, Zum Feinbau der Siebröhren-Plastiden vonAristolochia undAsarum (Aristolochiaceae),Planta97:62–69.

  Google Scholar 

• Behnke, H.-D., 1981, Siebelement-Plastiden, Phloem-Protein und Evolution der Blütenpflanzen: II. Monocotyledonen,Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Ges.94:647–662.

  Google Scholar 

• Behnke, H.-D., and Barthlott, W., 1983, New evidence from the ultrastructural and micro-morphological fields in angiosperm classification,Nord. J. Bot.3:43–66.

  Google Scholar 

• Behnke, H.-D., and Dahlgren, R., 1976, The distribution of characters within an angiosperm system, 2. Sieve element plastids,Bot. Not.129:287–295.

  Google Scholar 

• Bergson, H., 1908,L’evolution creatice, Paris.

  Google Scholar 

• Björnstad, I., 1970, Comparative embryology of Asparagoideae-Polygonatae, Liliaceae,Nytt Mag. Bot.17:169–207.

  Google Scholar 

• Björnstad, I., and Friis, I., 1972, Studies on the genusHaemanthus L. (Amaryllidaceae). II. A revision of the sectionDemeusa (De Wild. & Th. Dur.) Pax & Hoffm. emend. I. Björnstad & I. Friis,Nor. J. Bot.19:207–222.

  Google Scholar 

• Bonde, N., 1977, Cladistic classification as applied to vertebrates, inMajor Patterns in Vertebrate Evolution (M. K. Hecht, P. C. Goody, and B. M. Hecht, eds.), pp. 741–804, Plenum, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Boudet, A. M., Lecusson, R., and Boudet, A., 1975, Mise en évidence et propriétés de deux formes de la 5-déshydroquinate hydrolyase chez les végétaux supérieurs,Planta (Berl.)124:67–75.

  CAS  Google Scholar 

• Boudet, A. M., Boudet, A., and Bouyssou, H., 1977, Taxonomic distribution of isoenzymes of dehydroquinate hydrolyase in the angiosperms,Phytoehemistry16:919–922.

  CAS  Google Scholar 

• Bremer, K., and Wanntorp, H.-E., 1978, Phylogenetic systematics in botany,Taxon21:311–329.

  Google Scholar 

• Bremer, K., and Wanntorp, H.-E., 1981a, A cladistic classification of green plants,Nord. J. Bot.1:1–13.

  Google Scholar 

• Bremer, K., and Wanntorp, H.-E., 1981b, The cladistic approach to plant classification, in:Advances in Cladistics (V. Funk and D. R. Brooks, eds.), pp. 87–94, New York Botantical Gardens, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Brewbaker, J. L., 1967, The distribution and phylogenetic significance of binucleate and trinucleate pollen grains in the angiosperms,Am. J. Bot.54:1069–1083.

  Google Scholar 

• Burger, W. C., 1977, The Piperales and the monocots. Alternative hypotheses of mono-cotyledonous flowers,Bot. Rev.43:346–393.

  Google Scholar 

• Burger, W. C., 1981, Heresy revived: The monocot theory of angiosperm origin,Evol. Theory5:189–225.

  Google Scholar 

• Bush, G. L. 1975, Modes of animal speciation,Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.6:339–364.

  Google Scholar 

• Cantino, P. D., 1982, Affinities of the Lamiales: A cladistic analysis,Syst. Bot.7:237–248.

  Google Scholar 

• Chanda, S., and Ghosh, K., 1976, Pollen morphology and its evolutionary significance in Xanthorrhoeaceae, in:The Evolutionary Significance of the Exine (I. K. Ferguson and J. Muller, eds.), pp. 527–559, Academic, London.

  Google Scholar 

• Cheadle, V. I., 1943, The origin and certain trends of specialization of the vessels in the Monocotyledoneae,Am. J. Bot.30:11–17.

  Google Scholar 

• Cheadle, V. I., 1944, Specialization of vessels within the xylem of each organ in the Monocotyledoneae,Am. J. Bot.31:81–92.

  Google Scholar 

• Cheadle, V. I., 1953, Independent origin of vessels in the monocotyledons and dicotyledons,Phytomorphology3:23–44.

  Google Scholar 

• Cheadle, V. I., and Kosakai, H., 1980, Occurrence and specialization of vessels in Commelinales,Phytomorphology30:98–117.

  Google Scholar 

• Cheadle, V. I., and Kosakai, H., 1982, Occurrence and specialization of vessels in Xyridales,Nord. J. Bot.2:97–109.

  Google Scholar 

• Chupov, V. S., and Kutiavina, N. G., 1978, The comparative immuno-electrophoretic investigation of seed proteins of Liliaceae (in Russian),Bot. Zh.63:473–493.

  Google Scholar 

• Chupov, V. S., and Kutiavina, N. G., 1981, Serological studies in the order Liliales (in Russian),Bot. Zh.66:75–81.

  Google Scholar 

• Clifford, H. T., 1970, Monocotyledon classification with special reference to the origin of grasses (Poaceae), in: New Research in Plant Anatomy (N. K. B. Robsonet al., eds.),Bot. J. Linn. Soc. (Suppl. 1)1970:25–34.

  Google Scholar 

• Clifford, H. T., and Williams, W. T., 1980, Interrelationships amongst the Liliatae: A graph theory approach,Aust. J. Bot.28:261–268.

  Google Scholar 

• Conover, M., 1982, The vegetative morphology and development of the reticulate-veined Lilliiflorae and their parallel veined allies, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Massachusetts.

  Google Scholar 

• Cracraft, I., 1975, Historical biogeography and earth history: Perspectives for a future synthesis,Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.62:227–250.

  Google Scholar 

• Crisci, I. V., and Stussey, T. F., 1980, Determining primitive character states for phylo-genetic reconstruction,Syst. Bot.5:112–135.

  Google Scholar 

• Crisci, I. V., and Stussey, T. F., 1982, Of reason and logic: Evolutionary polarity revisited,Syst. Bot.7:230.

  Google Scholar 

• Cronquist, A., 1963, The taxonomic significance of evolutionary parallelism,Sida1:109–116.

  Google Scholar 

• Cronquist, A., 1968,The Evolution and Classification of Flowering Plants, Nelson, London.

  Google Scholar 

• Cronquist, A., 1969, Broad features of the system of angiosperms,Taxon18:188–193.

  Google Scholar 

• Cronquist, A., 1981,An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants, Columbia University Press, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Cullen, J., 1978, A preliminary survey of ptyxis (vernation) in the angiosperms.Notes R. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh37:161–214.

  Google Scholar 

• Daghlian, C. P., 1981, A review of the fossil record of monocotyledons,Bot. Rev.47:517–555.

  Google Scholar 

• Dahlgren, R. (in cooperation with Hansen, B., Jakobsen, K., and Larsen, K.), 1974,An-giospermernes Taxonomi, 1, Akademisk Forlag, Copenhagen.

  Google Scholar 

• Dahlgren, R. (in cooperation with Hansen, B., Jakobsen, K., Jensen, S. R., Larsen, K., and Nielsen, B. J.), 1979,Angiospermernes Taxonomi, 1, 2nd ed., Akademisk Forlag, Copenhagen.

  Google Scholar 

• Dahlgren, R. 1980, A revised system of classification of the angiosperms,Bot. J. Linn. Soc.80:91–124.

  Google Scholar 

• Dahlgren, R., 1983, General aspects of angiosperm evolution and macrosystematics,Nord. J. Bot.3:119–149.

  Google Scholar 

• Dahlgren, R., and Clifford, H. T., 1981, Some conclusions from a comparative study of the monocotyledons and related dicotyledonous orders,Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Ges.94:203–227.

  Google Scholar 

• Dahlgren, R., and Clifford, H. T., 1982,The Monocotyledons: A Comparative Study, Academic, London.

  Google Scholar 

• Darwin, C., 1859,On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, Murray, London.

  Google Scholar 

• Daumann, E., 1970, Das Blütennektarium der Monocotyledonen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung seiner systematischen und phylogenetischen Bedeutung,Feddes Repert.80:463–590.

  Google Scholar 

• Davis, G. L., 1966,Systematic Embryology of the Angiosperms, Wiley, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• De Vos, M., 1972, The genusRomulea in South Africa,J. S. Afr. Bot. (Suppl.)9:1–307.

  Google Scholar 

• Dilcher, D. L., 1979, Early angiosperm reproduction: An introductory report,Rev. Paleobot. Palynol.27:291–328.

  Google Scholar 

• Dressier, R. L., 1981,The Orchids—Natural History and Classification, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  Google Scholar 

• Duncan, T., 1980, Cladistics for the practicing taxonomists—An eclectic view,Syst. Bot.5:136–148.

  Google Scholar 

• Eastop, V., 1979, Stenorrhyncha as angiosperm taxonomists,Symb. Bot. Ups.22:120–134.

  Google Scholar 

• Eldredge, N., and Cracraft, J., 1980,Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary Process, Columbia University Press, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• El-Gazzar, A., and Hamza, M. K., 1975, On the monocots-dicots distinction,Publ. Cairo Univ. Herb.6:15–28.

  Google Scholar 

• Emberger, L., 1960,Traité de Botanique, Vol. II,Les végétaux vasculaires (M. Chaudefaut and L. Emberger, eds.), Masson, Paris.

  Google Scholar 

• Engler, A., 1919, Araceae,Das Pflanzenreich 4(23A).

  Google Scholar 

• Erdtman, G., 1952,Pollen Morphology and Plant Taxonomy: Angiosperms, Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm.

  Google Scholar 

• Estabrook, G. F., 1972, Cladistic methodology: A discussion of the theoretical basis for the induction of evolutionary history,Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.3:427–456.

  Google Scholar 

• Estabrook, G. F., 1977. Does common equal primitive?,Syst. Bot.2:36–42.

  Google Scholar 

• Estabrook, G. F., 1978, Some concepts for the estimation of evolutionary relationships,Syst. Bot.3:146–158.

  Google Scholar 

• Estabrook, G. F., and McMorris, F. R., 1980, When is one estimate of evolutionary relationships a refinement of another?,J. Math. Biol.10:367–373.

  Google Scholar 

• Estabrook, G. F., Johnson, C. S., and McMorris, F. R., 1975, An idealized concept of the cladistic character,Math. Biosci.23:263–272.

  Google Scholar 

• Estabrook, G. F., Johnson, C. S., and McMorris, F. R., 1976a, An algebraic analysis of cladistic characters,Discrete Math.16:141–147.

  Google Scholar 

• Estabrook, G. F., Johnson, C. S., and McMorris, F. R., 1976b, A mathematical foundation for the analysis of cladistic character compatibility,Math. Biosci.29:181–187.

  Google Scholar 

• Farris, J. S., and Kluge, G., 1979, A botanical clique,Syst. Zool.28:400–411.

  Google Scholar 

• Felsenstein, J., 1978, Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading,Syst. Zool.27:401–410.

  Google Scholar 

• Felsenstein, J., 1979, Alternative methods of phylogenetic inference and their relationship,Syst. Zool.28:49–62.

  Google Scholar 

• Felsenstein, J., 1981, A likelihood approach to character weighting and what it tells us about parsimony and compatibility,Biol. J. Linn. Soc.16:183–196.

  Google Scholar 

• Funk, V. A., 1981, Special concerns in estimating plant phylogenies, in:Advances in Cladistics (V. A. Funk and D. M. Brooks, eds.), pp. 73–86, New York Botanical Gardens, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Funk, V. A., and Stussey, T. F., 1978, Cladistics for the practicing taxonomist,Syst. Bot.3:159–178.

  Google Scholar 

• Goldblatt, P., 1977, The genusMoraea in the winter rainfall region of Southern Africa,Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.63:657–786.

  Google Scholar 

• Gornall, R. J., Bohm, B. A., and Dahlgren, R., 1979, The distribution of flavonoids in the angiosperms,Bot. Not.132:1–30.

  CAS  Google Scholar 

• Gould, S. J., 1980, Is a new and general theory of evolution emerging?,Paleobiology6:119–130.

  Google Scholar 

• Haines, R. W., and Lye, K. A., 1975, Seedlings of Nymphaeaceae,Bot. J. Linn. Soc.70:255–265.

  Google Scholar 

• Hamann, U., 1961, Merkmalsbestand und Verwandtschaftsbeziehungen der “Farinosae,”Willdenowia2:639–768.

  Google Scholar 

• Hamann, U., 1962a, Weiteres über Merkmalsbestand und Verwandtschaftsbeziehungen der “Farinosae,”Willdenowia3:169–207.

  Google Scholar 

• Hamann, U., 1962b, Beitrag zur Embryologie der Centrolepidaceae mit Bemerkungen über den Bau der Blüten und Blütenstände und die systematische Stellung der Familie,Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Ges.75:153–171.

  Google Scholar 

• Hamann, U., 1966, Embryologische, morphologisch-anatomische und systematische Untersuchungen an Philydraceen,Willdenowia4:1–178.

  Google Scholar 

• Hamann, U., 1975, Neue Untersuchungen zur Embryologie und Systematik der Centrolepidaceae,Bot. Jahrb.96:154–191.

  Google Scholar 

• Hamann, U., 1976, Hydatellaceae—A new family of Monocotyledoneae,N. Z. J. Bot.14:193–196.

  Google Scholar 

• Harborne, J. B., 1973, Flavonoids as systematic markers in the angiosperms, in:Chemistry in Botanical Classification (G. Bendz and J. Santesson, eds.), pp. 103–115, Academic, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Harris, P. J., and Hartley, R. D., 1980, Phenolic constituents of the cell walls of monocotyledons,Biochem. Syst. Ecol.8:153–160.

  CAS  Google Scholar 

• Hennig, W., 1950,Grundzüge einer Theorie der phylogenetischen Systematik, Deutscher Zentralverlag, Berlin.

  Google Scholar 

• Hennig, W., 1966,Phylogenetic Systematics, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois.

  Google Scholar 

• Hennig, W., 1969,Die Stammesgeischichte der Insekten, Kramer, Frankfurt am Main.

  Google Scholar 

• Heslop-Harrison, Y., and Shivanna, K. R., 1977, The receptive surface of the angiosperm stigma,Ann. Bot.41:1233–1258.

  Google Scholar 

• Hickey, L. J., and Doyle, J. A., 1977, Early Cretaceous fossil evidence for angiosperm evolution,Bot. Rev.43:3–104.

  Google Scholar 

• Holttum, R. E., 1967, Comparative morphology, taxonomy and evolution,Phytomorphology17:36–41.

  Google Scholar 

• Huber, H., 1969, Die Samenmerkmale und Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse der LiliifloraeMitt. Bot. Staatssamml. München.8:219–538.

  Google Scholar 

• Huber, H., 1977, The treatment of the monocotyledons in an evolutionary system of classification,Plant Syst. Evol., Suppl. 11977:285–298.

  Google Scholar 

• Hull, D. L., 1966, Phylogenetic numericlature,Syst. Zool.15:14–17.

  Google Scholar 

• Hull, D. L., 1967, Certainty and circularity in evolutionary taxonomy,Evolution21:174–189.

  Google Scholar 

• Hull, D. L., 1970, Contemporary systematic philosophies,Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.1:19–54.

  Google Scholar 

• Hull, D. L., 1979, The limits of cladism,Syst. Zool.28:416–440.

  Google Scholar 

• Hutchinson, J., 1934,The Families of Flowering Plants, II,Monocotyledons, Macmillan, London.

  Google Scholar 

• Hutchinson, J., 1959,The Families of Flowering Plants, II,Monocotyledons, 2nd ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford.

  Google Scholar 

• Huxley, I., 1958, Evolutionary processes and taxonomy with special reference to grades,Upps. Univ. Årsskrift1958:21–38.

  Google Scholar 

• Inamdar, J. A., and Aleykutty, K. M., 1979, Studies onCabomba aquatica (Cabombaceae),Plant Syst. Evol.132:161–166.

  Google Scholar 

• Krajncic, B., and Dévidé, Z., 1979, Flower development inSpirodela polyrrhiza (Lemna-ceae),Plant Syst. Evol.132:305–312.

  Google Scholar 

• Leavitt, R. G., 1904, Trichomes of the root in vascular cryptogams and angiosperms,Proc. Boston Nat. Hist. Soc.31:273–313.

  Google Scholar 

• Martin, A. C., 1946, The comparative internal morphology of seeds,Am. Midl. Nat.36:513–660.

  Google Scholar 

• Mayr, E., 1974, Cladistic analysis or cladistic classification?Z. Zool. Syst. Evolutionsforsch.12:94–128.

  Google Scholar 

• McMorris, F. R., 1975, Compatibility criteria for cladistic and qualitative taxonomic characters, in:Proceedings of the 8th International Conference Numerical Taxonomy (G. F. Estabrook ed.), pp. 399–429, Freeman, San Francisco, California.

  Google Scholar 

• McNeill, J., 1978, Purposeful phenetics,Syst. Zool.28:465–482.

  Google Scholar 

• Meacham, C. A., 1980, Phylogeny of the Berberidaceae with an evaluation of classifications,Syst. Bot.5:149–172.

  Google Scholar 

• Meacham, C. A., 1981, A manual method for character compatibility analysis, Taxon30:591–600.

  Google Scholar 

• Meeuse, A. D. J., 1978, Nectarial secretion, floral evolution, and the pollination syndrome in early Angiosperms,Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. Ser. C Biol. Med. Sci.81:300–326.

  Google Scholar 

• Metcalfe, C. R., 1971,Anatomy of the Monocotyledons, Vol. V,Cyperaceae, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

  Google Scholar 

• Mitter, C., 1981. “Cladistics” in botany.Syst. Zool.30:373–376.

  Google Scholar 

• Moore, H. E., Jr., 1953, The genusMilia (Amaryllidaceae-Allieae) and its allies,Gentes Herb.8:269–294.

  Google Scholar 

• Muller, J., 1981, Fossil pollen records of extant angiosperms,Bot. Rev.47:1–146.

  Google Scholar 

• Müller-Doblies, D., 1968, Über die Verwandtschaft vonTypha und Sparganium im Inflo-rescenz-und Blütenbau,Bot. Jahrb. Syst.89:451–562.

  Google Scholar 

• Nelson, G. J., 1970, Outline of a theory of comparative biology.Syst. Zool.19:373–376.

  PubMed CAS  Google Scholar 

• Nelson, G. J., 1971, Paraphyly and polyphyly: Redefinitions.Syst. Zool.21:471–472.

  Google Scholar 

• Nelson, G. J., 1972, Comments on Hennig’s “Phylogenesc systematics” and its influence on ichthyology,Syst. Zool.21:364–374.

  Google Scholar 

• Nelson, G. J., 1974, Classification as an expression of phylogenetic relationships.Syst. Zool.22:344–359.

  Google Scholar 

• Nelson, G., 1978, Ontogeny, phylogeny, paleontology, and the Biogenetic Law,Syst. Zool.27:324–345.

  Google Scholar 

• Nelson, G., and Platnick, N., 1981,Systematics and Bio geography, Columbia University Press, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Patterson, C., 1978,Evolution. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

  Google Scholar 

• Rasmussen, F. N., 1982, The gynostemium of the neottioid orchids,Opera Bot.65:1–97.

  Google Scholar 

• Rieppel, O., 1978, Ontogeny and the recognition of primitive character states,Zool. Syst. Evolutionsforsch.17:57–61.

  Google Scholar 

• Sattler, R., and Singh, V., 1978, Floral organogenesis of Echinodorus amazonicus Rataj and floral construction of the Alismatales,Bot. J. Linn. Soc.77:141–156.

  Google Scholar 

• Savile, D. B. O., 1979, Fungi as aids in higher plant classification,Bot. Rev.45:377–503.

  Google Scholar 

• Seigler, D. S., 1977, Plant systematics and alkaloids,Alkaloids16:1–82.

  CAS  Google Scholar 

• Simpson, G. G., 1961,Principles of Animal Taxonomy, Columbia University Press, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Singh, V., and Sattler, R., 1977, Development of the inflorescence and flower inSagittaria cuneata,Can. J. Bot.55:1087–1105.

  Google Scholar 

• Slater, J. A., 1976, Monocots and chinch-bugs: A study of host plant relationships in the Lygaeid subfamily Blissinae (Hemiptera: Lygidae),Biotropica8:143–165.

  Google Scholar 

• Sneath, P., and Sokal, R., 1962, Numerical taxonomy,Nature4818:855–856.

  Google Scholar 

• Stanley, S. M., 1979,Macroevolution: Pattern and Process, Freeman, San Francisco, California.

  Google Scholar 

• Stant, M. Y., 1964, Anatomy of the Alismataceae,J. Linn. Soc. (Bot.)59:1–42.

  Google Scholar 

• Stant, M. Y., 1967, Anatomy of Butomaceae,J. Linn. Soc. (Bot.)60:31–60.

  Google Scholar 

• Steenis, C. G. G. J., 1982, Pentastemona, a new 5-merous genus of monoctyledons from North Sumatra,Blumea28:151–163.

  Google Scholar 

• Stebbins, G. L., 1974,Flowering Plants: Evolution above the Species Level, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  Google Scholar 

• Stevens, P. F., 1980, Evolutionary polarity of character states,Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.11:333–358.

  Google Scholar 

• Stevens, P. F., 1981, On ends and means, or how polarity criteria can be assessed,Syst. Bot.6:186–188.

  Google Scholar 

• Takhtajan, A., 1969,Flowering Plants. Origin and Dispersal, Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.

  Google Scholar 

• Takhtajan, A., 1980, Outline of the classification of flowering plants (Magnoliophyta)Bot. Rev.46:295–359.

  Google Scholar 

• Tattersall, I., and Eldredge, N., 1977, Fact, theory, and fantasy in human paleontology,Am. Sci.65:204–211.

  PubMed CAS  Google Scholar 

• Thanikaimoni, G., 1978, Pollen morphological terms: Proposed definitions—1, in:IV International Palyn. Conference, Lucknow (1976–1977), Vol. 1, pp. 228–239.

  Google Scholar 

• Thorne, R. F., 1976, A phylogenetic classification of the Angiospermae,Evol. Biol.9:35–106.

  Google Scholar 

• Tomlinson, P. B., 1962, Phylogeny of the Scitamineae—Morphological and anatomical considerations,Evolution16:192–213.

  Google Scholar 

• Tomlinson, P. B., 1969,Anatomy of the Monocotyledons. III. Commelinales-Zingiberales, (C. R. Metcalfe, ed.), Clarendon Press, Oxford.

  Google Scholar 

• Tomlinson, P. B., 1974, Development of the stomatal complex as a taxonomic character in the monocotyledons,Taxon23:109–128.

  Google Scholar 

• Tomlinson, P. B., 1982,Anatomy of the Monocotyledons. VII. Helobiae (Alismatales), (C. R. Metcalfe, ed.), Clarendon Press, Oxford.

  Google Scholar 

• Uhl, N. W., and Moore, H. E., 1980, Androecial development in six polyandrous genera representing five major groups of palms;Ann. Bot.45:57–70.

  Google Scholar 

• Untawale, A. G., and Bhasin, R. K., 1973, On endothecial thickenings in some monoco-tyledonous families,Curr. Sci.42:398–400.

  Google Scholar 

• Utech, F. H., and Kawano, S., 1976, Biosystematic studies onDisporum (Liliaceae-Polygonatae): IV. Floral biology ofD. sessile D. Don andD. smilacinum A. Gray from Japan,Bot. Mag. Tokyo89:159–171.

  Google Scholar 

• Van Steenis, C. G. G. J., 1982,Pentastemona, a new 5-merous genus of monocotyledons from North Sumatra,Blumea28:151–163.

  Google Scholar 

• Van Tieghem, P., 1887, Structure de la racine et disposition des radicelles dans Centrole-pidées, Eriocaulées, Joncées, Mayacées, et Xyridées,J. Bot.1:305–315.

  Google Scholar 

• Van Tieghem, P., and Duliot, H., 1888, Récherches comparatives sur l’origine des membres endogénes dans les plantes vasculaires,Ann. Sci. Nat., Ser. 78:1–666.

  Google Scholar 

• Velenovsky, J., 1907,Vergleichende Morphologie der Pflanzen, II, Rivnat, Prague.

  Google Scholar 

• Von Staudermann, W., 1924, Die Haare der Monocotyledonen,Bot. Archiv8:105–184.

  Google Scholar 

• Walker, J. W., 1975, Comparative pollen morphology and phylogeny of the Ranalean complex, in:The Origin and Early Evolution of Angiosperms (C. B. Beck, ed.), pp. 241–299, Columbia University Press, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Walker, J. W., 1976, Evolutionary significance of the exine in the pollen of primitive angiosperms, in:The Evolutionary Significance of the Exine (I. K. Ferguson and J. Muller, eds.), pp. 251–308, Academic, London.

  Google Scholar 

• Wagner, P., 1977, Vessel types of monocotyledons: A survey,Bot. Not.130:383–402.

  Google Scholar 

• Watrous, L. E., and Wheeler, Q. D., 1981, The out-group comparison method of character analyses,Syst. Zool.30:1–11.

  Google Scholar 

• Wernham, H. F., 1912, Floral evolution: With particular reference to the sympetalous dicotyledons.—IX. Summary and conclusion. Evolutionary genealogy and some principles of classification,New Phytol.11:373–397.

  Google Scholar 

• Wheeler, Q. D., 1981, The ins and outs of character analysis: A response to Crisci and Stussey,Syst. Bot.6:297–306.

  Google Scholar 

• Wilder, G. J., and Harris, D. H., 1982, Laticifers inCyclanthus bipartitus Poit. (Cyclanthaceae),Bot. Gaz.143:84–93.

  Google Scholar 

• Wiley, E. O., 1978, The evolutionary species concept reconsidered,Syst. Zool.27:17–26.

  Google Scholar 

• Wiley, E. O., 1979, An annotated Linnean hierarchy, with comments on natural taxa and competing systems,Syst. Zool.28:308–337.

  Google Scholar 

• Wiley, E. O., 1980, Phylogenetic systematics and vicariance biogeography,Syst. Bot.5:194–220.

  Google Scholar 

• Wiley, E. O., 1981,Phylogenetics, I Wiley, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Wunderlich, R., 1959, Zur Frage der Phylogenie der Endospermtypen bei den Angiospermen, Oest. Bot. Z.106:203–293.

  Google Scholar 

• Yakolev, M. S., and Zhukova, G. Y., 1980, Chlorophyll in embryos of angiosperm seeds, a review:Bot. Notiser133:323–336.

  Google Scholar 

• Young, D. A., 1981, Are the angiosperms primitively vesselless?,Syst. Bot.6:313–330.

  Google Scholar 

Download references