Abstract
This chapter focuses on the specific autotelic quality and the affective, cognitive, and performance-related consequences of the flow experience. Research findings documenting a positive relationship between skills–demands compatibility (the central precondition of flow experiences) and components of an autotelic experience (intrinsic motivation, enjoyment, and involvement) are discussed. Besides, possible consequences of flow experiences are addressed. A review of currently available findings indicates that flow may foster positive affect and even lead to enhanced performance. Unfortunately, the findings, which are mostly correlational in nature, do not provide conclusive evidence regarding the consequences related to flow experiences—reflecting the fact that the empirical analysis of flow experiences is quite complex. Important intricacies of flow research and theorizing and their implications are discussed—specifically, the lack of methods to test for causal effects of flow experiences and the tendency to equate flow experience with skills–demands compatibility.
This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Subscribe and save
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
Buy Now
- Chapter
- JPY 3498
- Price includes VAT (Japan)
- eBook
- JPY 10295
- Price includes VAT (Japan)
- Softcover Book
- JPY 12869
- Price includes VAT (Japan)
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Csikszentmihalyi and others usually refer to “challenges” instead of “demands.” Also, in most flow studies, “challenges” are measured. However, the use of the term “challenge” in the conceptualization and measurement of skills–demands compatibility is problematic because from the viewpoint of motivational psychology, challenges occur as a consequence of compatibility between demands of the situation and the individual’s skills (cf. Rheinberg2008). Furthermore, it should be noted that the term “challenge” typically implies the notion that an individual perceives the relevant situation as stimulating, whereas the term “demands” does not include an implication regarding the individual’s experiential state. Accordingly, we argue that to put challenges in relation to skills (a common praxis in flow research) is conceptually not particularly meaningful. Therefore, we prefer the term “demands” and will use it in the course of the chapter.
- 2.
However, as persistence in a task is often related to ego-involvement rather than previous enjoyment (e.g., Ryan et al. 1991), it is usually used in combination with self-report measures and should not be understood as a replacement of them.
- 3.
References
Abuhamdeh, S., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2009). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation orientations in the competitive context: An examination of person-situation interactions.Journal of Personality, 77, 1615–1635.
Bakker, A. B. (2008). The work-related flow inventory: Construction and initial validation of the WOLF.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 400–414.
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1252–1265.
Bless, H., Clore, G. L., Schwarz, N., Golisano, V., Rabe, C., & Wölk, M. (1996). Mood and the use of scripts: Does a happy mood really lead to mindlessness?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 665–679.
Chartrand, T. L., van Baaren, R. B., & Bargh, J. A. (2006). Linking automatic evaluation to mood and information processing style: Consequences for experienced affect, impression formation, and stereotyping.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 135, 70–77.
Chen, H., Wigand, R. T., & Nilan, M. (2000). Exploring web users optimal flow experiences.Information Technology and People, 13, 263–281.
Clarke, S. G., & Haworth, J. T. (1994). “Flow” experience in the daily lives of sixth-form college students.British Journal of Psychology, 85, 511–523.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975).Beyond boredom and anxiety: Experiencing flow in work and play. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1982). Toward a psychology of optimal experience. In L. Wheeler (Ed.),Review of personality and social psychology (pp. 13–36). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990).Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997).Finding flow. The psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York: Basic Books.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). If we are so rich, why aren’t we happy?American Psychologist, 54, 821–827.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the Experience Sampling Method.Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175, 529–536.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & LeFevre, J. (1989). Optimal experience in work and leisure.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 815–822.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Rathunde, K. (1993). The measurement of flow in everyday life: Toward a theory of emergent motivation. In J. Jacobs (Ed.),Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1992: Developmental perspectives on motivation, current theory and research in motivation, 1992 (Vol. 40, pp. 57–97). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993).Talented teenagers: A longitudinal study of their development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Schiefele, U. (1994). Interest and the quality of experience in classrooms.European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10, 251–270.
Deci, E. L. (1972). Intrinsic motivation, extrinsic reinforcement, and inequity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 113–120.
Deci, E. L. (1975).Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum.
Deci, E., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B., & Leone, D. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective.Journal of Personality, 62, 119–142.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1980). The empirical exploration of intrinsic motivational process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 39–80). New York: Academic.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985a).Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behaviour. New York: Plenum.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985b). The general causality scale: Self-determination in personality.Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 109–134.
Delle Fave, A., & Bassi, M. (2000). The quality of experience in adolescents’ daily life: Developmental perspectives.Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 126, 347–367.
Demerouti, E. (2006). Job characteristics, flow and performance: The moderating role of conscientiousness.Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11, 266–280.
Eisenberger, R., Jones, J. R., Stinglhamber, F., Shanock, L., & Randall, A. T. (2005). Flow experiences at work: For high need achievers alone?Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 755–775.
Eklund, R. C. (1996). Preparing to compete: A season-long investigation with collegiate wrestlers.The Sport Psychologist, 10, 111–131.
Engeser, S., & Rheinberg, F. (2008). Flow, moderators of challenge-skill-balance and performance.Motivation and Emotion, 32, 158–172.
Engeser, S., Rheinberg, F., Vollmeyer, R., & Bischoff, J. (2005). Motivation, Flow-Erleben und Lernleistung in universitären Lernsettings [Motivation, flow experience and performance in learning settings at university].Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 19, 159–172.
Fritz, B. S., & Avsec, A. (2007). The experience of flow and subjective well-being of music students.Horizons of Psychology, 17, 5–17.
Fullagar, C. J., & Mills, M. (2008). Motivation and flow: Toward an understanding of the dynamics of the relation in architecture students.The Journal of Psychology, 142, 533–553.
Hamilton, D. L., Katz, L. B., & Leirer, V. O. (1980). Cognitive representation of personality impressions: Organizational processes in first impression formation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1050–1063.
Haworth, J. T., & Hill, S. (1992). Work, leisure and psychological well-being in a sample of young adults.Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 2, 147–160.
Heckhausen, H. (1989).Motivation und Handeln [Motivation and action]. Berlin: Springer.
Hektner, J. M., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996).A longitudinal exploration of flow an intrinsic motivation in adolescents. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American education research association. New York: Alfred Sloan Foundation.
Heo, J., Lee, Y., Pedersen, P. M., & McCormick, B. P. (2010). Flow experience in the daily lives of older adults: An analysis of the interaction between flow, individual differences, serious leisure, location, and social context.Canadian Journal on Aging, 29, 411–423.
Huntsinger, J. R., Clore, G. L., & Bar-Anan, Y. (2010). Mood and global-local focus: Priming a local focus reverses the link between mood and global-local processing.Emotion, 10, 722–126.
Jackson, S. A., Kimiecik, J. C., Ford, S. K., & Marsh, H. W. (1998). Psychological correlates of flow in sport.Journal of Sport & Experience Psychology, 20, 358–378.
Jackson, S. A., & Roberts, G. C. (1992). Positive performance states of athletes: Toward a conceptual understanding of peak performance.The Sport Psychologist, 6, 156–171.
Jackson, S. A., Thomas, P. R., Marsh, H. W., & Smethurst, C. J. (2001). Relationship between flow, self-concept, psychological skills, and performance.Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 13, 129–153.
Keller, J., & Bless, H. (2008). Flow and regulatory compatibility: An experimental approach to the flow model of intrinsic motivation.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 196–209.
Keller, J., Bless, H., & Blomann, F. (2011a).Flow and the tunnel vision: Cognitive consequences of a skills-demands-compatibility. Manuscript in preparation.
Keller, J., Bless, H., Blomann, F., & Kleinbohl, D. (2011b). Physiological aspects of flow experiences: Skills-demand-compatibility effects on heart rate variability and salivary cortisol.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 849–852.
Keller, J., & Blomann, F. (2008). Locus of control and the flow experience: An experimental analysis.European Journal of Personality, 22, 589–607.
Keller, J., & Landhäußer, A. (2012). Im Flow sein: Experimentelle Analysen des Zustands optimaler Beanspruchung [Experiencing flow: Experimental analyses of the experiential state resulting from optimal task demands].Psychologische Rundschau.
Keller, J., Landhäußer, A., & Fischer, J. (2011c).Effects of a skills-demands-compatibility: Flow experiences and physiological reactions in an aversive activity. Manuscript in preparation.
Keller, J., Ringelhan, S., & Blomann, F. (2011d).Does skills-demands-compatibility result in intrinsic motivation? Experimental test of a basic notion proposed in the theory of flow-experiences. Manuscript under review.
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology.Handbook of Social Psychology, 1, 233–265.
Krapp, A. (1999). Intrinsische Lernmotivation und Interesse.Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 45, 387–406.
Kruglanski, A. W. (1989).Lay epistemics and human knowledge: Cognitive and motivational bases. New York: Plenum.
Landhäußer, A., Keller, J., & Frommherz, A. (2011).The paradox of work reconsidered: A systematic test based on the Day Reconstruction Method. Manuscript in preparation.
Lee, E. (2005). The relationship of motivation and flow experience to academic procrastination in university students.The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 166, 5–14.
MacDonald, R., Byrne, C., & Carlton, L. (2006). Creativity and flow in musical composition: An empirical investigation.Psychology of Music, 34, 292–306.
Massimini, F., & Carli, M. (1988). The systematic assessment of flow in daily experience. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.),Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 266–287). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Massimini, F., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Delle Fave, A. (1988). Flow and biocultural evolution. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.),Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 60–81). New York: Cambridge University Press.
McInman, A. D., & Grove, J. R. (1991). Peak moments in sport: A literature review.Quest, 43, 333–351.
Moller, A. C., Meier, B. P., & Wall, R. D. (2010). Developing an experimental induction of flow: Effortless action in the lab. In B. Bruya (Ed.),Effortless attention: A new perspective in the cognitive science of attention and action (pp. 191–204). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Moneta, G. B. (2004a). The flow experience across cultures.Journal of Happiness Studies, 5, 115–121.
Moneta, G. B. (2004b). The flow model of state intrinsic motivation in Chinese: Cultural and personal moderators.Journal of Happiness Studies, 2, 181–217.
Moneta, G. B., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). The effect of perceived challenges and skills on the quality of subjective experience.Journal of Personality, 64, 275–310.
Moneta, G. B., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Models of concentration in natural environments: A comparative approach based on streams of experiential data.Social Behavior and Personality, 27, 603–637.
Nakamura, Y. (1988). Optimal experience and the uses of talent. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.),Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 319–326). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2009). Flow theory and research. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.),Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 195–206). New York: Oxford University Press.
Partington, S., Partington, E., & Olivier, S. (2009). The dark side of flow: A qualitative study of dependence in big wave surfing.The Sport Psychologist, 23, 170–185.
Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale.Psychological Assessment, 5, 164–172.
Percival, G., Crous, F., & Schepers, J. M. (2003). Cognitive potencial and job complexity as predictors of flow.Journal of Industrial Psychology, 29, 60–71.
Quinn, R. W. (2005). High performance experience in the design of national security.Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 610–641.
Rheinberg, F. (2008). Intrinsic motivation and flow-experience. In H. Heckhausen & J. Heckhausen (Eds.),Motivation and action (pp. 323–348). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Rheinberg, F., Manig, Y., Kliegl, R., Engeser, S., & Vollmeyer, R. (2007). Flow bei der Arbeit, doch Glück in der Freizeit. Zielausrichtung, Flow und Glücksgefühle [Flow during work but happiness during leisure time: Goals, flow-experience, and happiness].Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 51, 105–115.
Sansone, C., & Smith, J. L. (2000). Interest and self-regulation: The relation between havingto and wanting to. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.),Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 343–374). New York: Academic.
Schallberger, U., & Pfister, R. (2001). Flow-Erleben in Arbeit und Freizeit: Eine Untersuchung zum ‘Paradox der Arbeit’ mit der Experience Sampling Method (ESM) [Flow experiences in work and leisure: An experience sampling study about the paradox of work].Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 45, 176–187.
Schiefele, U., & Roussakis, E. (2006a). Die Bedingungen des Flow-Erlebens in einer experimentellen Spielsituation.Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 214, 207–219.
Schiefele, U., & Roussakis, E. (2006b). Die Bedingungen des Flow-Erlebens in einer experimentellen Spielsituation [Experimental conditions for experiencing flow in computer games].Zeitschrift für Psychologie mit Zeitschrift für angewandte Psychologie und Sprache & Kognition, 214, 207–219.
Schüler, J. (2007). Arousal of flow experience in a learning setting and its effects on exam performance and affect.Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 21, 217–227.
Schüler, J., & Brunner, S. (2009). The rewarding effect of flow experience on performance in a marathon race.Psychology of Sport & Exercise, 10, 168–174.
Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., & Kasser, T. (2004). The independent effects of goal contents and motives on well-being: It’s both what you pursue and why you pursue it.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 475–486.
Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Schneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory.School Psychology Quarterly, 18, 158–176.
Shin, D. C., & Johnson, D. M. (1978). Avowed happiness as an overall assessment of the quality of life.Social Indicators Research, 5(475), 492.
Stein, G. L., Kimiecik, J. C., Daniels, J., & Jackson, S. A. (1995). Psychological antecedents of flow in recreational sport.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 125–135.
Stoll, O., & Lau, A. (2005). Flow-Erleben beim Marathonlauf – Zusammenhänge mit Anforderungspassung und Leistung.Zeitschrift für Sportpsychologie, 12, 75–82.
Wells, A. J. (1988). Self-esteem and optimal experience. In M. Csikszentmihalyi (Ed.),Flow: The psychology of optimal experience (pp. 327–341). New York: Harper and Row.
Woodworth, R. S. (1918).Dynamic psychology. New York: Columbia University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
Anne Landhäußer & Johannes Keller
- Anne Landhäußer
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Johannes Keller
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence toAnne Landhäußer.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
, Fachbereich I - Psychologie, Universität Trier, Trier, 54286, Germany
Stefan Engeser
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Landhäußer, A., Keller, J. (2012). Flow and Its Affective, Cognitive, and Performance-Related Consequences. In: Engeser, S. (eds) Advances in Flow Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2359-1_4
Download citation
Published:
Publisher Name:Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN:978-1-4614-2358-4
Online ISBN:978-1-4614-2359-1
eBook Packages:Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)
Share this chapter
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative