3246Accesses
9Citations
Abstract
Research in the area of facial attractiveness has examined the role of race in the perception of beauty, revealing that regardless of our own skin color, we tend to prefer light skin to dark skin in most matters of choice. Subsequently, the current research, utilizing morphed faces combined in varying degrees Black, White, and Asian facial characteristics, was expected to corroborate with past research by showing that participants found the “pure” White face the most attractive and the “pure” Black face the least attractive. Instead, participants found least attractive the “pure” Asian face. The results are discussed in terms of prior research with a focus on the concept of familiarity. Also discussed are possible limitations and opportunities for future research to further examine and clarify the difference between the present data and the existing literature.
This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.Notes
- 1.
An example of “normal” fluctuating asymmetry is having one foot that is slightly larger than the other. High fluctuating asymmetry, which is less common, might manifest itself in feet that are grossly different in size, so much so that one cannot wear the same size shoe on both feet.
- 2.
The CCC was used in the current research with the express permission of its creator.
- 3.
- 4.
The term “SuperSenior” is a term used in particular to this institution. It refers to students who choose to spend a fifth year at the university in order to earn a dual AB-BS degree in engineering. None participated in the study.
- 5.
This number includes French, U.S., and Chilean territories.
- 6.
At the time of this research, approximately 0.5–1% of United States adolescents present with diagnosable anorexia nervosa, and 2–3% of adolescents with bulimia nervosa (Eating Disorders Coalition 2006). Many more adolescents and adults suffer from other clinical and sub-clinical disordered eating behaviors.
References
Alley, T. R. (1988). Physiognomy and social perception. In T. R. Alley (Ed.)Social and applied aspects of perceiving faces (pp. 167–190). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Alley, T. R., & Hilebrandt, K.A. (1988). Determinants and consequences of facial aesthetics. In T. R. Alley (Ed.)Social and applied aspects of perceiving faces (pp. 101–140). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Badcock, C. F. (1920). The significance of facial beauty.Scientific Progress, 15: 70–73.
Bauduoin, J. Y., & Tiberghien, G. (2004). Symmetry, averageness, and feature size in the facial attractiveness of women.Acta Psychologica, 117(3): 313–332.
Berry, D. S. (1991). Attractive faces are not all created equal: Joint effects of facial babyishness and attractiveness on social perception.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5): 523–231.
Bradshaw, C. K. (1992). Beauty and the beast: On racial ambiguity. In M. P. P. Root (Ed.),Racially mixed people in America (pp. 77–90). London: Sage.
Chen, N. Y., Shaffer, D. R., & Wu, C., (1997). On physical attractiveness stereotyping in Taiwan: A revised sociocultural perspective.Journal of Social Psychology, 137(1): 117–124.
Cunningham, M. R. (1986). Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: Quasi- experiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(5): 925–935.
Cunningham, M. R., Roberts, A. R., Barbee, A. P., Druen, P. B. et al. (1995). ‘Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours’: Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(2): 261–279.
Cunningham, M. R., Barbee, A.P., & Philhower, C. L. (2002). Dimensions of facial physical attractiveness: The intersection of biology and culture. In G. Rhodes & L. A. Zebrowitz, (Eds.).Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary, cognitive, and social perspectives (pp. 193–238). Westport, CT: Ablex.
de Casanova, E. M. (2004). ‘No ugly woman’: concepts of race and beauty among adolescent women in Ecuador.Gender and Society, 18(3): 287–308.
Deutsch, C. K. (1987). Disproportion in psychiatric syndromes. In L. G. Farkas & I. R. Munro (Eds.),Anthropometric facial proportions in medicine (pp. 131–141). Springfield, IL: Thomas.
Dion, K. K. (2002). Cultural perspectives on facial attractiveness. In G. Rhodes, and L. A. Zebrowitz (Eds.),Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary, cognitive, and social perspectives (pp. 239–260). Westport, CT: Ablex.
Dion, K. K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285–290.
Eating disorders coalition [for research, policy, & action]. (2006).http://www.eatingdisorderscoalition.org/reports/statistics.html. Accessed 16 April 2006.
Eyetsemitan, F. (2004). An exploratory study of the emotion-expressive behaviors of “peace,” “contentment,” and “annoyed/irritated”: Implications for dead and living faces.Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 48(1): 88–99.
Fink, B., Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (2001). Human (homo sapiens) facial attractiveness in relation to skin texture and color.Journal of Comparative Psychology, 115(1): 92–99.
Galton, F. (1878). Composite portraits.Nature, 18: 97–100.
Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., & Yeo, R. A. (1994). Facial attractiveness, developmental stability, and fluctuating asymmetry.Ethology and Sociobiology, 15(2): 73–85.
Gordon, K. H., Perez, M., & Joiner Jr., T. E. (2002). The impact of racial stereotypes on eating disorder recognition.International Journal of Eating Disorders, 32(2):219–224.
Hall, R. E. (1998). Skin color bias: A new perspective on an old problem.Journal of Psychology, 132(2): 238–240.
Helms, J. E. (1995). The people of color (POC) racial identity attitude scale. Unpublished manuscript.
Hill, M. E. (2002). Skin color and the perception of attractiveness among African Americans: Does gender make a difference?Social Psychology Quarterly, 65(1): 77–91.
Hinsz, V. B., Matz, D. C., & Patience, R. A. (2001). Does women’s hair signal reproductive potential?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31(2): 166–172.
Ishi, H., Gyoba, J., Kamahi, M., Mukaida, S., & Akamatsu, S. (2004). Analysis of facial attractiveness on feminised and juvenilised faces.Perception, 33(2): 135–145.
Johnston, V. S. (2000). Female facial beauty: The fertility hypothesis.Pragmatics and Cognition8,(1): 107–122.
Jones, B. C., Anthony, A. C., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2004a). When facial attractiveness is only skin deep.Perception, 33(5): 569–576.
Jones, B. C., Little, A C., Feinberg, D. R., Penton-Voak, I. S., Tiddeman, B. P., & Perrett, D. I. (2004b). The relationship between shape symmetry and perceived skin condition in male facial attractiveness.Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(1): 24–30.
Jones, D., & Hill, K. (1993). Criteria of facial attractiveness in five populations.Human Nature, 4(3), 271–296.
Langlois, J. H., & Roggman, L. A. (1990). Attractive faces are only average.Psychological Science, 1(2): 115–121.
Langlois, J., Roggman, L. A., & Ritter, J. M. (1987). Infant preferences for attractive faces: rudiments or a stereotype?Developmental Psychology, 86: 415–427.
Langlois, J. H., Roggman, L. A., & Musselman, L. (1995). What is average and what is not average about attractive faces?Psychological Science, 5(4): 214–220.
Livshits, G., & Kobylianski, E. (1991). Fluctuating asymmetry as a possible measure of developmental homeostasis in humans: A review.Human Biology, 63:441–266.
Lundqvist, D., Esteves, R., & Ohman, A. (2004). The face of wrath: The role of features and configurations in conveying social threat.Cognition and Emotion, 18(2): 161–182.
Mack, D., & Rainey, D. (1990). Female applicant’s personal grooming and personnel selection.Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5(5): 399–407.
[The] McKnight Investigators. (2003). Risk factors for the onset of eating disorders in adolescent girls: Results of the McKnight longitudinal risk factor.American Journal of Psychiatry, 160: 248–254.
Mealey, L., Bridgstock, R., & Townsend, G. C. (1999). Symmetry and perceived facial attractiveness: A monozygotic co-twin comparison.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(1): 151–158.
Mescko, N., & Bereczkei, T. (2004). Hairstyle as an adaptive means of displayed phenotypic quality.Human nature: An interdisciplinary bisocial perspective, 15(3): 251–270.
Morris, D. (1967).The naked ape: A zoologist’s study of the human animal. New York: McGraw-Hill.
NAACP. (2008).http://www.naacp.org/home/index.htm. Accessed 27 January 2008.
Oetting, E. R., & Beauvais, F. (1991). Orthogonal cultural orientation theory: The cultural identification of minority adolescents.International Journal of the Addictions, 25: 655–685.
Parham, T. A., & Helms, J. E. (1985). Attitudes of racial identity and self-esteem of Black students: An exploratory investigation.Journal of College Student Personnel, 26(2): 143–147.
Parker, S., Nichter, M., Vuckovic, N., Sims, C., & Ritenbaugh, C. (1995). Body image and weight concerns among African American and White adolescent females: Differences that make a difference.Human Organization, 54(2): 103–114.
Perrett, D. I., Burt, D. M., Penton-Voak, I. S., Lee, K. J., Rowland, D. A., & Edwards, R. (1999). Symmetry and human facial attractiveness.Evolution and Human Behavior, 20(5): 295–307.
Peskin, M., & Newell, F. N. (2004). Familiarity breeds attraction: Effects of exposure on the attractiveness of typical and distinctive faces.Perception, 33(2): 147–157.
Phinney, J. S. (1992). The multigroup ethnic identity measure: A new scale for use with diverse groups.Journal of Adolescent Research, 7: 156–176.
Poran, M. A. (1991). Denying diversity: Perceptions of beauty and social comparison processes among Latina, Black, and White women.Sex Roles, 47(1): 65–82.
Rhodes, G. & Tremewan, T. (1996). Averageness, exaggeration, and facial attractiveness.Psychological Science, 7(2): 105–110.
Rhodes, G., Proffitt, F., Grady, J. M., & Sumich, A. (1998). Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty.Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5(4): 659–669.
Rhodes, G., Harwood, K., Yoshikawa, S., Nishitani, M., & McLean, I. (2002).The attractiveness of average faces: Cross-cultural evidence and possible biological basis. In G. Rhodes & L. A. Zebrowitz (Eds.),Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary, cognitive, and social perspectives (pp. 35–58). Westport, CT: Ablex.
Rubenstein, A. J., Langlois, J. H., & Roggman, L. A. (2002). What makes a face attractive and why: The role of averageness in defining facial beauty. In G. Rhodes & L. A. Zebrowitz (Eds.),Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary, cognitive, and social perspectives (pp. 1–34). Westport, CT: Ablex.
Stewart, J. E. (1980). Defendant's attractiveness as a factor in the outcome of criminal trials: An observational study.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10(4), 348–361.
Terry, R. L. (1977). Further evidence on components of facial attractiveness.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 45(1): 130.
Terry, R. L., & Davis, J. S. (1976). Components of facial attractiveness.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 42(3): 918.
Tipples, J., Atkinson, A. P., & Andrew, W. (2002). The eyebrow frown: A salient social signal.Emotion, 2(3): 288–296.
Wade, T. J., & Dautrich, L. (2005). Racial characteristics and individual differences in men’s evaluations of women's facial attractiveness and personality. Unpublished manuscript.
Wade, T. J., & DiMaria, C. (2003). Weight halo effects: Individual differences in perceived life success as a function of women’s race and weight.Sex Roles, 48(9–10): 461–465.
Wade, T. J., Dyckman, K. A., & Cooper, M. (2004). Invisible men: Evolutionary theory and attractiveness and personality evaluations of 10 African American male facial shapes.Journal of Black Psychology, 30(4): 477–488.
Wade, T. J., Irvine, K., & Cooper, M. (2004). Racial characteristics and individual differences in women’s evaluations of men’s facial attractiveness and personality.Personality and Individual Differences, 36(5): 1083–1092.
Zaidel, D. W., Aarde, S. M., & Baig, K. (2005). Appearance of symmetry, beauty, and health in human faces.Brain and Cognition, 57(3): 561–263.
Zebrowitz, L.A., Montepare, J. M., & Lee, H. (1993). They don't all look alike: Individual impressions of other racial groups.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1): 85–101.
Zebrowitz, L. A., Hall, J. A., Murphy, N. A., & Rhodes, G. (2002). Looking smart and looking good: Facial cues to intelligence and their origins.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(2): 238–249
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Department of Psychology, Bucknell University, Walnut port, PA, USA
Nicole E. Belletti
- Nicole E. Belletti
Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar
- T. Joel Wade
Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence toNicole E. Belletti.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
School of Social Work, Michigan State University, 254 Baker Hall, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
Ronald E. Hall
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Belletti, N.E., Wade, T.J. (2008). Racial Characteristics and Female Facial Attractiveness Perception Among United States University Students. In: Hall, R.E. (eds) Racism in the 21st Century. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79098-5_6
Download citation
Publisher Name:Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN:978-0-387-79097-8
Online ISBN:978-0-387-79098-5
eBook Packages:Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)
Share this chapter
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

