Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content
DEV Community
Log in Create account

DEV Community

Dharmendra Kumar
Dharmendra Kumar

Posted on • Edited on

     

✅ Image Quality: AVIF vs WebP vs JPEG/PNG

Below is the updated version of your content with the addedbrowser support information for bothAVIF andWebP:


Image Quality: AVIF vs WebP vs JPEG/PNG

Let’s dive deeper intoimage quality — how sharp and vibrant your images appear, and how much you can shrink their file size without compromising detail.


🔥AVIF Quality

ProsCons
Superior compression: Up to50% smaller than WebP at thesame quality!⚠️Encoding speed can be slower (when creating the image, not during loading).
High dynamic range (HDR) support for vivid, bright images.⚠️ Safari still haspartial support, so always test.
Best for gradients,details,transparency, andsharp edges (less banding or artifacts).
Transparency (alpha) andanimation supported.
Improved image sharpness andclarity compared to WebP at the same size.
Improved color accuracy: AVIF supports morecolors anddepth for richer images.

➡️AVIF typically outperforms WebP, especially with complex images like gradients, shadows, and intricate details, making it ideal for high-quality web visuals.


Code Example: AVIF Image in HTML

<picture><sourcesrcset="image.avif"type="image/avif"><imgsrc="image.jpg"alt="AVIF Example"/></picture>
Enter fullscreen modeExit fullscreen mode

WebP Quality

ProsCons
Much smaller than JPEG/PNG, withgood quality maintained.Not as efficient as AVIF for compression at thesame quality.
Transparency support (including alpha channel).Visible artifacts at smaller file sizes, especially in high-detail areas like gradients.
Animation support (ideal for lightweight GIF alternatives).Compression limits may show in complex images like high-resolution photos.
Widely supported inall major browsers, even in older versions of Safari.

➡️ WebP strikes abalance: smaller file sizes than JPEG/PNG with great quality and almost universal support. However, it’s not quite as advanced as AVIF in terms of image quality and compression efficiency.


Code Example: WebP Image in HTML

<picture><sourcesrcset="image.webp"type="image/webp"><imgsrc="image.jpg"alt="WebP Example"/></picture>
Enter fullscreen modeExit fullscreen mode

📷JPEG/PNG Quality

JPEGPNG
✅ Decent quality (lossy compression), suitable for photos.✅ Perfect quality (lossless compression), no quality loss.
Larger file sizes due to lower compression efficiency.Huge file sizes, especially for detailed images.
❌ No support fortransparency (without tricks).✅ Supportstransparency with alpha channel.
❌ No support foranimation.❌ No support foranimation.
Visible artifacts at low compression rates (blurry edges).✅ Ideal forlogos, icons, and illustrations requiring high detail.

Code Example: JPEG Image in HTML

<imgsrc="image.jpg"alt="JPEG Example"/>
Enter fullscreen modeExit fullscreen mode

Code Example: PNG Image in HTML

<imgsrc="image.png"alt="PNG Example"/>
Enter fullscreen modeExit fullscreen mode

Visual Example of Quality Difference

  • AVIF ➡️ Smaller file size + better detail +less banding (ideal for photos with high dynamic range).
  • WebP ➡️ Slightly bigger but still very efficient.Good quality, though compression artifacts can be more noticeable infine gradients ordetailed patterns.
  • JPEG/PNG ➡️ Larger files withlower compression efficiency. JPEG may introduce visible compression artifacts, while PNG offers lossless quality but at acostly file size.

Quick Summary

FormatQuality (Best to Worst)CompressionTransparencyAnimationBrowser SupportBest For
AVIF🔥 Best quality + smallest size🚀 Up to50% better than WebP✅ Yes✅ YesChrome, Firefox, Edge (partial Safari)Modern web images, high-quality visuals
WebP✅ Very good, not as good as AVIF⚡ Smaller than JPEG, bigger than AVIF✅ Yes✅ YesAlmost all major browsersCompatibility, fallback for older browsers
JPEG❌ OK but large❌ Outdated, inefficient❌ No❌ NoAll browsersOlder websites, photo galleries
PNG✅ Perfect (lossless), huge files❌ Very large✅ Yes❌ NoAll browsersLogos, icons, transparent graphics

Additional Benefits of Modern Image Formats

🚀Better Compression

  • AVIF offerssuperior compression, reducing file size by up to50% compared to WebP for the same image quality, making itideal for web optimization and reducing load times.
  • WebP provides a balance,smaller file sizes than JPEG/PNG while maintaininggood quality, though it’s not as efficient as AVIF.

Faster Loading Times

  • With smaller file sizes, bothAVIF andWebP images contribute to fasterpage load speeds, improvinguser experience andSEO rankings.
  • Smaller image sizes meanfewer HTTP requests and less bandwidth consumption, which is crucial for mobile users and those with slower internet connections.

🖼️Support for Transparency and Animation

  • BothAVIF andWebP supporttransparency andanimation, making them more versatile for modern web content, such asinteractive websites,dynamic banners, andapp icons.

🌈Enhanced Image Quality

  • AVIF supports ahigher bit-depth (up to 12 bits per channel), which results inimproved color accuracy, richer tones, and better rendering of fine details, especially inHDR images.
  • WebP offersdecent image quality with reasonable compression but struggles with complex images compared to AVIF.

📊SEO & Performance Optimization

  • Image size optimization directly impactsSEO rankings. Faster load times due tosmaller file sizes can lead to alower bounce rate and highersearch engine rankings.
  • By using AVIF/WebP over traditional formats like JPEG/PNG, websites becomemore mobile-friendly and are able tobetter adapt to varying internet speeds.

🎨Use Cases

  • AVIF is ideal forhigh-quality visuals withdynamic range (e.g., photography, artwork) while maintaining low file sizes.
  • WebP serves as a solid middle ground, especially forfallback support where broad compatibility and relatively small file sizes are key.
  • JPEG remains best for older websites, galleries, and instances wherefile size is not as crucial but high-quality photos are needed.
  • PNG is best used for images that requirelossless quality, such aslogos andicons where transparency is a priority.

Browser Support for AVIF and WebP

Browsers Supporting AVIF:

BrowserVersion
Google ChromeSupported since version 85
Mozilla FirefoxSupported since version 93
Microsoft EdgeSupported since version 85
SafariSupported since version 16.0
OperaSupported since version 71
Samsung InternetSupported since version 14.0
BraveSupported since version 1.22
VivaldiSupported since version 3.3

Browsers Not Supporting AVIF:

  • Internet Explorer: All versions
  • Older versions of browsers: Versions prior to the ones listed above do not support AVIF.

Browsers Supporting WebP:

BrowserVersion
Google ChromeSupported since version 23
Mozilla FirefoxSupported since version 65
Microsoft EdgeSupported since version 18
SafariSupported since version 14
OperaSupported since version 15
Samsung InternetSupported since version 4.0
BraveSupported since version 1.0
VivaldiSupported since version 2.0

Browsers Not Supporting WebP:

  • Internet Explorer: All versions
  • Older versions of browsers: Versions prior to the ones listed above do not support WebP.

When Quality Matters

  • AVIF: Use whenhigh-quality images andsmall file sizes are essential for modern web design.
  • WebP: Perfect forbroad browser support andfallbacks, offering a solid balance between quality and file size.
  • JPEG/PNG: Use only if you requiremaximum compatibility with older browsers or devices (e.g., email attachments, legacy systems).

By making the right choice between these formats, you canoptimize user experience,boost SEO, and deliverhigher-quality images without sacrificing loading speeds or performance.

Top comments(0)

Subscribe
pic
Create template

Templates let you quickly answer FAQs or store snippets for re-use.

Dismiss

Are you sure you want to hide this comment? It will become hidden in your post, but will still be visible via the comment'spermalink.

For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/orreporting abuse

⚡I’m a curious coder who loves building things! Whether it’s creating beautiful website designs or making sure the behind-the-scenes stuff runs smoothly, I’m all in. Let’s turn code into magic! ⚡
  • Location
    Bihar- Bettiah
  • Education
    BE
  • Work
    Software Engineer at Qualminds
  • Joined

More fromDharmendra Kumar

DEV Community

We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.

Log in Create account

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp