I’m going to say something that might sound controversial, but I promise you it comes from a place of solidarity: The term "Imposter Syndrome" has done more to harm developers than to help them.

For years, we've been told that the gut-wrenching feeling of not being good enough, the anxiety that you're one pull request away from being exposed as a fraud, is a syndrome. A psychological condition that resides within you. The solution, we're told, is to "fight it," to build confidence, to journal, to affirm our own worth.

What if we've been looking at it backwards?

What if that feeling isn't a pathology? What if it's a perfectly rational, healthy, and even intelligent response to the environment we work in?

Let me explain.

**

The "Syndrome" of Working in a Complex Field

**
Think about what we do for a living. The landscape of software development changes not yearly, but monthly. A framework you mastered last quarter is now legacy. A "best practice" from six months ago is now an anti-pattern. The sheer volume of things you don't know grows exponentially every single day.

Feeling a sense of uncertainty in this context isn't a disorder. It's a sign of awareness. It means you understand the scope of the field. The true "imposters" are often the ones who are blissfully unaware of what they don't know, bulldozing ahead with overconfidence.

That knot in your stomach when you're given a task you've never done before? That's not a syndrome. That's the feeling of learning. It's the cognitive dissonance of stretching your brain beyond its current limits. We have mistakenly medicalized the natural discomfort of growth.

**

When It's Not You, It's The System

**
By calling it a "syndrome," we place the entire burden of the problem on the individual. We tell developers, "You need to fix your mindset." This conveniently lets the actual culprits off the hook. Let's reframe some common scenarios:

You're given a task with vague requirements and an impossible deadline.

• Imposter Syndrome Lens: "I'm so slow. I don't know how to do this. Everyone else would have figured it out by now."
• The Reality Lens: "This project was poorly scoped and under-resourced. My anxiety is a reasonable reaction to a poorly managed situation."

You're the only woman or person of color on a team, and your ideas are overlooked.

• Imposter Syndrome Lens: "My ideas must not be good enough. I don't belong here."
• The Reality Lens: "I am experiencing a well-documented phenomenon called 'structural bias.' My environment is failing to provide psychological safety and equal opportunity."

You're surrounded by senior engineers who use jargon you don't understand.

• Imposter Syndrome Lens: "I'm so far behind. I'm not a real engineer."
• The Reality Lens: "My team has a poor knowledge-sharing culture. The onus to bridge the communication gap shouldn't fall solely on me."

In each case, the problem isn't a faulty individual, but a faulty environment. Calling it "Imposter Syndrome" gaslights us into believing the problem is ours to solve alone, rather than demanding better from our teams, our managers, and our companies.

The Three Real Culprits (That Aren't You)

If it's not a syndrome, what is it? Often, it's one of these systemic issues:

• Toxic Hustle Culture: The constant celebration of "10x engineers" who code 80-hour weeks and have 100 side projects creates an unrealistic benchmark. Feeling inadequate next to this myth isn't a syndrome; it's a rational response to an unhealthy standard.
• Poor Onboarding and Mentorship: Being thrown into a massive, undocumented codebase and expected to perform is terrifying. Your feeling of being lost isn't a character flaw; it's a sign that your company has failed to provide a proper ramp-up process.
• Lack of Psychological Safety: If you're afraid to ask a "stupid" question or admit you don't know something for fear of being judged, you will feel like an imposter. This isn't your anxiety; it's your environment's failure to create a culture of learning.

**

What Do We Call It Instead?

**
Let's retire the term "imposter syndrome". It's a misdiagnosis that pathologises the learner's journey.

Instead, let's use more accurate language:

• "I'm in a steep learning phase."
• "I'm experiencing the natural discomfort of growth."
• "My workplace lacks psychological safety."
• "I am being held to an unrealistic standard."

This shift in language is powerful. It moves the problem from being an internal, personal defect to being an external, solvable challenge. It empowers you to seek the right solutions: asking for clearer requirements, requesting a mentor, or pushing back on unreasonable deadlines.

A Call for Systemic Change
This isn't just semantics. It's about accountability. By stopping the "Imposter Syndrome" narrative, we can start asking harder, more important questions:

• Managers: Are you creating an environment where it's safe to say "I don't know"?
• Senior Developers: Are you sharing your own struggles and knowledge gaps, or are you perpetuating a myth of effortless genius?
• Companies: Are your hiring practices and performance reviews rewarding unrealistic superheroics or sustainable, collaborative work?

The feeling we've been calling "Imposter Syndrome" is often just the growing pains of a competent person in a demanding, ever-changing, and sometimes poorly managed field.

You are not sick. You are not broken. You are learning. You are adapting. And your feelings are a signal that something in your environment needs to change, not that something in you is wrong.

So, I want to know what you think. Am I onto something, or am I completely off base?

Is it always 'Imposter Syndrome,' or is it sometimes just a reasonable reaction to a difficult job, a toxic environment, or the simple, overwhelming nature of our field? Share your story in the comments.