Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:



Network Working Group                                         P. HoffmanRequest for Comments: 4266                                VPN ConsortiumObsoletes:1738                                            November 2005Category: Standards TrackThe gopher URI SchemeStatus of This Memo   This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the   Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for   improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet   Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state   and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.Copyright Notice   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).Abstract   This document specifies the gopher Uniform Resource Identifier (URI)   scheme that was originally specified inRFC 1738.  The purpose of   this document is to allowRFC 1738 to be made obsolete while keeping   the information about the scheme on standards track.1.  Introduction   URIs were previously defined inRFC 2396 [RFC2396], which was updated   byRFC 3986 [RFC3986].  Those documents also specify how to define   schemes for URIs.   The first definition for many URI schemes appeared inRFC 1738   [RFC1738].  Because that document has been made obsolete, this   document copies the gopher URI scheme from it to allow that material   to remain on standards track.2.  Scheme Definition   The gopher URL scheme is used to designate Internet resources   accessible using the Gopher protocol.   The base Gopher protocol is described inRFC 1436 [RFC1436] and   supports items and collections of items (directories).  The Gopher+   protocol is a set of upward-compatible extensions to the base Gopher   protocol and is described in [Gopher+].  Gopher+ supports associatingHoffman                     Standards Track                     [Page 1]

RFC 4266                 The gopher URI Scheme             November 2005   arbitrary sets of attributes and alternate data representations with   Gopher items.  Gopher URLs accommodate both Gopher and Gopher+ items   and item attributes.   Historical note: The Gopher protocol was widely implemented in the   early 1990s, but few Gopher servers are in use today.2.1.  Gopher URL Syntax   A Gopher URL takes the form:      gopher://<host>:<port>/<gopher-path>   where <gopher-path> is one of:      <gophertype><selector>      <gophertype><selector>%09<search>      <gophertype><selector>%09<search>%09<gopher+_string>   If :<port> is omitted, the port defaults to 70. <gophertype> is a   single-character field to denote the Gopher type of the resource to   which the URL refers.  The entire <gopher-path> may also be empty, in   which case the delimiting "/" is also optional and the <gophertype>   defaults to "1".   <selector> is the Gopher selector string.  In the Gopher protocol,   Gopher selector strings are a sequence of octets that may contain any   octets except 09 hexadecimal (US-ASCII HT or tab), 0A hexadecimal   (US-ASCII character LF), and 0D (US-ASCII character CR).   Gopher clients specify which item to retrieve by sending the Gopher   selector string to a Gopher server.   Within the <gopher-path>, no characters are reserved.   Note that some Gopher <selector> strings begin with a copy of the   <gophertype> character, in which case that character will occur twice   consecutively.  The Gopher selector string may be an empty string;   this is how Gopher clients refer to the top-level directory on a   Gopher server.2.2.  Specifying URLs for Gopher Search Engines   If the URL refers to a search to be submitted to a Gopher search   engine, the selector is followed by an encoded tab (%09) and the   search string.  To submit a search to a Gopher search engine, the   Gopher client sends the <selector> string (after decoding), a tab,   and the search string to the Gopher server.Hoffman                     Standards Track                     [Page 2]

RFC 4266                 The gopher URI Scheme             November 20052.3.  URL Syntax for Gopher+ Items   Historical note: Gopher+ was uncommon even when Gopher was popular.   URLs for Gopher+ items have a second encoded tab (%09) and a Gopher+   string.  Note that in this case, the %09<search> string must be   supplied, although the <search> element may be the empty string.   The <gopher+_string> is used to represent information required for   retrieval of the Gopher+ item.  Gopher+ items may have alternate   views and arbitrary sets of attributes, and they may have electronic   forms associated with them.   To retrieve the data associated with a Gopher+ URL, a client will   connect to the server and send the Gopher selector, followed by a tab   and the search string (which may be empty), followed by a tab and the   Gopher+ commands.2.4.  Default Gopher+ Data Representation   When a Gopher server returns a directory listing to a client, the   Gopher+ items are tagged with either a "+" (denoting Gopher+ items)   or a "?" (denoting Gopher+ items that have a +ASK form associated   with them).  A Gopher URL with a Gopher+ string consisting of only a   "+" refers to the default view (data representation) of the item, and   a Gopher+ string containing only a "?" refers to an item with a   Gopher electronic form associated with it.2.5.  Gopher+ Items with Electronic Forms   Gopher+ items that have a +ASK associated with them (i.e., Gopher+   items tagged with a "?") require the client to fetch the item's +ASK   attribute to get the form definition, and then ask the user to fill   out the form and return the user's responses along with the selector   string to retrieve the item.  Gopher+ clients know how to do this but   depend on the "?" tag in the Gopher+ item description to know when to   handle this case.  The "?" is used in the Gopher+ string to be   consistent with Gopher+ protocol's use of this symbol.2.6.  Gopher+ Item Attribute Collections   To refer to the Gopher+ attributes of an item, the Gopher URL's   Gopher+ string consists of "!" or "$". "!" refers to all of a Gopher+   item's attributes. "$" refers to all the item attributes for all   items in a Gopher directory.Hoffman                     Standards Track                     [Page 3]

RFC 4266                 The gopher URI Scheme             November 20052.7.  Referring to Specific Gopher+ Attributes   To refer to specific attributes, the URL's gopher+_string is   "!<attribute_name>" or "$<attribute_name>".  For example, to refer to   the attribute containing the abstract of an item, the gopher+_string   would be "!+ABSTRACT".   To refer to several attributes, the gopher+_string consists of the   attribute names separated by coded spaces.  For example,   "!+ABSTRACT% 20+SMELL" refers to the +ABSTRACT and +SMELL attributes   of an item.2.8.  URL Syntax for Gopher+ Alternate Views   Gopher+ allows for optional alternate data representations (alternate   views) of items.  To retrieve a Gopher+ alternate view, a Gopher+   client sends the appropriate view and language identifier (found in   the item's +VIEW attribute).  To refer to a specific Gopher+   alternate view, the URL's Gopher+ string would be in the form:      +<view_name>%20<language_name>   For example, a Gopher+ string of "+application/postscript%20Es_ES"   refers to the Spanish language postscript alternate view of a Gopher+   item.2.9.  URL Syntax for Gopher+ Electronic Forms   The gopher+_string for a URL that refers to an item referenced by a   Gopher+ electronic form (an ASK block) filled out with specific   values is a coded version of what the client sends to the server.   The gopher+_string is of the form:      +%091%0D%0A+-1%0D%0A<ask_item1_value>%0D%0A      <ask_item2_value>%0D%0A.%0D%0A   To retrieve this item, the Gopher client sends the following text to   the Gopher server.      <a_gopher_selector><tab>+<tab>1<cr><lf>      +-1<cr><lf>      <ask_item1_value><cr><lf>      <ask_item2_value><cr><lf>      .<cr><lf>Hoffman                     Standards Track                     [Page 4]

RFC 4266                 The gopher URI Scheme             November 20053.  Security Considerations   There are many security considerations for URI schemes discussed in   [RFC3986].  The Gopher protocol uses passwords in the clear for   authentication, and offers no privacy, both of which are considered   extremely unsafe in current practice.4.  Informative References   [Gopher+]  Anklesaria, F., et al., "Gopher+: Upward compatible              enhancements to the Internet Gopher protocol", University              of Minnesota, July 1993, <ftp://boombox.micro.umn.edu/pub/              gopher/gopher_protocol/Gopher+/Gopher+.txt>   [RFC1738]  Berners-Lee, T., Masinter, L., and M. McCahill, "Uniform              Resource Locators (URL)",RFC 1738, December 1994.   [RFC2396]  Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform              Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax",RFC 2396,              August 1998.   [RFC3986]  Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform              Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66,RFC 3986, January 2005.   [RFC1436]  Anklesaria, F., McCahill, M., Lindner, P., Johnson, D.,              Torrey, D., and B. Albert, "The Internet Gopher Protocol              (a distributed document search and retrieval protocol)",RFC 1436, March 1993.Author's Address   Paul Hoffman   VPN Consortium   127 Segre Place   Santa Cruz, CA  95060   US   EMail: paul.hoffman@vpnc.orgHoffman                     Standards Track                     [Page 5]

RFC 4266                 The gopher URI Scheme             November 2005Full Copyright Statement   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).   This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions   contained inBCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors   retain all their rights.   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET   ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,   INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE   INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.Intellectual Property   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be   found inBCP 78 andBCP 79.   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository athttp://www.ietf.org/ipr.   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-   ipr@ietf.org.Acknowledgement   Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the   Internet Society.Hoffman                     Standards Track                     [Page 6]
Datatracker

RFC 4266
RFC - Proposed Standard

DocumentDocument typeRFC - Proposed Standard
November 2005
Report errata
ObsoletesRFC 1738
Wasdraft-hoffman-gopher-uri (individual in app area)
Select version
Compare versions
AuthorPaul E. Hoffman
Email authors
RFC streamIETF LogoIETF Logo
Other formats
Report a datatracker bug

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp