A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.BCP 56RFC 3205 Title: On the use of HTTP as a Substrate Author(s): K. Moore Status: Best Current Practice Date: February 2002 Mailbox: moore@cs.utk.edu Pages: 14 Characters: 34785 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag:draft-moore-using-http-01.txt URL:ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3205.txtRecently there has been widespread interest in using HypertextTransfer Protocol (HTTP) as a substrate for other applications-levelprotocols. This document recommends technical particulars of suchuse, including use of default ports, URL schemes, and HTTP securitymechanisms.This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for theInternet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions forimprovements. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.This announcement is sent to the IETF list and the RFC-DIST list.Requests to be added to or deleted from the IETF distribution listshould be sent to IETF-REQUEST@IETF.ORG. Requests to beadded to or deleted from the RFC-DIST distribution list shouldbe sent to RFC-DIST-REQUEST@RFC-EDITOR.ORG.Details on obtaining RFCs via FTP or EMAIL may be obtained by sendingan EMAIL message to rfc-info@RFC-EDITOR.ORG with the message bodyhelp: ways_to_get_rfcs. For example: To: rfc-info@RFC-EDITOR.ORG Subject: getting rfcs help: ways_to_get_rfcsRequests for special distribution should be addressed to either theauthor of the RFC in question, or to RFC-Manager@RFC-EDITOR.ORG. Unlessspecifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are forunlimited distribution.echoSubmissions for Requests for Comments should be sent toRFC-EDITOR@RFC-EDITOR.ORG. Please consultRFC 2223, Instructions to RFCAuthors, for further information.
draft-moore-using-http-01
| Document | Document type | This is an older version of an Internet-Draft that was ultimately published asRFC 3205. | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Select version | |||
| Compare versions | |||
| Author | Keith Moore Email authors | ||
| RFC stream | Legacy | ||
| Intended RFC status | Best Current Practice | ||
| Other formats |