This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see theLibrary Active Issues List for more information and the meaning ofC++23 status.
bool can't be an integer-like typeSection: 24.3.4.4[iterator.concept.winc]Status:C++23Submitter: Casey CarterOpened: 2020-07-23Last modified: 2023-11-22
Priority:0
View all otherissues in [iterator.concept.winc].
View all issues withC++23 status.
Discussion:
Per 25.2[ranges.syn]/1, the Standard Library believes it can convert an integer-like typeXto an unsigned integer-like type with the exposition-only type aliasmake-unsigned-like-t.make-unsigned-like-t<X> is specified as being equivalent tomake_unsigned_t<X> whenX is an integral type. However, despite being an integral type,bool is not a valid template type argument formake_unsigned_t per [tab:meta.trans.sign].
bool was an oversight when we added support for integer-like types: it was certainlynot the design intent to allowranges::size(r) to returnfalse! While we could devise somemore-complicated metaprogramming to allow use ofbool, it seems easier — and consistent with thedesign intent — to simply excludebool from the set of integer-like types.[2020-08-02; Reflector prioritization]
Set priority to 0 and status to Tentatively Ready after six votes in favour during reflector discussions.
[2020-11-09 Approved In November virtual meeting. Status changed: Tentatively Ready → WP.]
Proposed resolution:
This wording is relative toN4861.
Modify 24.3.4.4[iterator.concept.winc] as indicated:
-11- A type
Iother thancv boolisinteger-like if it modelsintegral<I>or if it is an integer-class type. An integer-like typeIissigned-integer-like if itmodelssigned_integral<I>or if it is a signed-integer-class type. An integer-liketypeIisunsigned-integer-like if it modelsunsigned_integral<I>or if it is anunsigned-integer-class type.