Message91681
| Author | jhylton |
|---|
| Recipients | cananian, gregory.p.smith, jhylton, mhammond |
|---|
| Date | 2009-08-18.11:32:21 |
|---|
| SpamBayes Score | 6.1247714e-09 |
|---|
| Marked as misclassified | No |
|---|
| Message-id | <e8bf7a530908180432h11d91558k62d053da3d787dd8@mail.gmail.com> |
|---|
| In-reply-to | <1250461498.96.0.307334525566.issue3566@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
|---|
| Content |
|---|
Not that we've removed the try one more time branch of the code,because it was causing other problems.JeremyOn Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Gregory P. Smith<report@bugs.python.org> wrote:>> Gregory P. Smith <greg@krypto.org> added the comment:>> btw, when using async io (poll, select, etc) I -think- your socket will> see a read event when the server closes the connection (sends you a FIN> or even a RST) at which point your sock.recv() when you've been told> data was ready will return 0 bytes indicating that the server has closed> the connection.>> I like your MSG_PEEK hack here. I'll figure out if this or something> else should go into (the giant mess that is) httplib.>> ----------> priority: -> normal>> _______________________________________> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>> <http://bugs.python.org/issue3566>> _______________________________________> _______________________________________________> Python-bugs-list mailing list> Unsubscribe:http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/jeremy%40alum.mit.edu>> |
|