Message295783
| Author | Jim.Jewett |
|---|
| Recipients | Jim.Jewett, asksol, davin, pitrou |
|---|
| Date | 2017-06-12.14:02:03 |
|---|
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
|---|
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
|---|
| Message-id | <CA+OGgf4VJxvhaKQ0=uoigiF+xjmt+esBsE7kPLCAmVv5uCqV-g@mail.gmail.com> |
|---|
| In-reply-to | <1497251751.07.0.0122653095141.issue30596@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
|---|
| Content |
|---|
Could join be called in a background thread, or even asynchronously? Thatseems like mixing paradigms, but ...On Jun 12, 2017 3:15 AM, "Antoine Pitrou" <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:>> Antoine Pitrou added the comment:>> That's a good question. close() methods on other objects tend to avoid> taking an infinite amount of time :-) But then, Process objects are> different enough that they don't need to follow that rule.>> ---------->> _______________________________________> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>> <http://bugs.python.org/issue30596>> _______________________________________> |
| 
➜