Message280150
| Author | Arfrever |
|---|
| Recipients | Arfrever, eryksun, ezio.melotti, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
|---|
| Date | 2016-11-06.16:52:48 |
|---|
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
|---|
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
|---|
| Message-id | <1478451169.54.0.215521431033.issue19569@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
|---|
| In-reply-to | |
|---|
| Content |
|---|
GCC supports pragmas to locally control warnings.https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-6.2.0/gcc/Diagnostic-Pragmas.htmlExample:====================================__attribute__((__deprecated__)) int some_deprecated_function(void){ return 0;};void some_function(void){ int x, y;#pragma GCC diagnostic push#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wdeprecated-declarations" x = some_deprecated_function();#pragma GCC diagnostic pop y = x + 1;} int main(int argc, char** argv){ return 0;}====================================In the above example, call to some_deprecated_function() does not trigger deprecation warning.'#pragma GCC diagnostic push' and '#pragma GCC diagnostic pop' are supported since GCC 4.6.0.https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.6/changes.html'#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored' is documented in documentation of GCC since 4.2.0.Clang supposedly supports both '#pragma GCC diagnostic ...' and '#pragma clang diagnostic ...':http://clang.llvm.org/docs/UsersManual.html#controlling-diagnostics-via-pragmas |
|