Message271769
| Author | ztane |
|---|
| Recipients | Jeffrey.Walton, alex, alexandre.vassalotti, christian.heimes, deadshort, dmalcolm, donmez, fweimer, jcea, jwilk, loewis, mark.dickinson, martin.panter, matejcik, nnorwitz, pitrou, python-dev, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner, xiang.zhang, ztane |
|---|
| Date | 2016-08-01.06:18:04 |
|---|
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
|---|
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
|---|
| Message-id | <1470032285.44.0.750853220573.issue1621@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
|---|
| In-reply-to | |
|---|
| Content |
|---|
I don't believe Python would really ever work on a platform with non-8-bit-bytes, I believe there are way too much assumptions *everywhere*. You can program in C on such a platform, yes, but not that sure about Python.And on 8-bit-byte platfomrs, there is no large model with 16-bit pointers anywhere. There just are not enough bits that you could have multiple 64k byte-addressable segments that are addressed with 16-bit pointers. It might be that some obscure platform in the past would have had 128k memory, with large pointers, 2 allocatable 64k segments, >16 bit char pointer and 16-bit object pointers pointing to even bytes, but I doubt you'd be really porting *Python 3* to such a platform, basically we're talking about something like Commodore 128 here. |
| History |
|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
|---|
| 2016-08-01 06:18:05 | ztane | set | recipients: +ztane,loewis,nnorwitz,jcea,mark.dickinson,pitrou,vstinner,christian.heimes,alexandre.vassalotti,donmez,matejcik,jwilk,alex,dmalcolm,python-dev,deadshort,martin.panter,serhiy.storchaka,fweimer,Jeffrey.Walton,xiang.zhang | | 2016-08-01 06:18:05 | ztane | set | messageid: <1470032285.44.0.750853220573.issue1621@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> | | 2016-08-01 06:18:05 | ztane | link | issue1621 messages | | 2016-08-01 06:18:04 | ztane | create | |
|