Message266383
| Author | markgrandi |
|---|
| Recipients | eryksun, hakril, markgrandi, paul.moore, python-dev, steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware |
|---|
| Date | 2016-05-25.18:12:51 |
|---|
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
|---|
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
|---|
| Message-id | <1464199971.42.0.0979145218142.issue23026@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
|---|
| In-reply-to | |
|---|
| Content |
|---|
in 'test_winreg.py', there should probably be a test that covers REG_QWORD_LITTLE_ENDIAN, even if they are essentially equivalent Also, in Py2Reg and Reg2Py, it seems that both are missing the 'case' clause for REG_QWORD_LITTLE_ENDIAN as wellcase REG_QWORD:case REG_QWORD_LITTLE_ENDIAN:<code here>And sure, i would have the documentation changes listed in 'Doc/whatsnew/3.6.rst'. And now that I think about it, the documentation in '/Doc/library/winreg.rst' should probably mention that REG_QWORD and REG_QWORD_LITTLE_ENDIAN are new as of python 3.6 |
| 
➜