Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


homepage

Message206717

This issue trackerhas been migrated toGitHub, and is currentlyread-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Authormaciej.szulik
RecipientsBreamoreBoy, Juarez.Bochi, Julian.Gindi, adam-collard, ajaksu2, alanvgreen, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, berker.peksag, cvrebert, guettli, jafo, josh-sf, maciej.szulik, mark.dickinson, petre, sonderblade, tiktuk, vajrasky
Date2013-12-20.23:28:14
SpamBayes Score-1.0
Marked as misclassifiedYes
Message-id<1387582099.96.0.468562291661.issue1100942@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I'm attaching merged and fixed patch (issue1100942_full.patch). Though during testing I found one issue with the patch: during checking for time part in date class I'm using (in _datetimemodule.c->date_strptime) DATE_GET_HOUR etc, but when given time parts are 0's then the test fails. Should I leave the patch as is, because possibility for 0's is very low or should I check the format string for time parts existence? Any further advice is appreciated.
History
DateUserActionArgs
2013-12-20 23:28:20maciej.szuliksetrecipients: +maciej.szulik,jafo,guettli,amaury.forgeotdarc,mark.dickinson,belopolsky,sonderblade,alanvgreen,ajaksu2,josh-sf,cvrebert,tiktuk,adam-collard,BreamoreBoy,berker.peksag,Juarez.Bochi,petre,vajrasky,Julian.Gindi
2013-12-20 23:28:19maciej.szuliksetmessageid: <1387582099.96.0.468562291661.issue1100942@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-12-20 23:28:19maciej.szuliklinkissue1100942 messages
2013-12-20 23:28:19maciej.szulikcreate
Supported byThe Python Software Foundation,
Powered byRoundup
Copyright © 1990-2022,Python Software Foundation
Legal Statements

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp