Message200989
| Author | ncoghlan |
|---|
| Recipients | christian.heimes, jcea, leim, macfreek, ncoghlan, pitrou, pmoody, python-dev, santoso.wijaya, terry.reedy |
|---|
| Date | 2013-10-22.20:34:48 |
|---|
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
|---|
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
|---|
| Message-id | <CADiSq7cgOm2AxbpAE1QZw-R9NR4R=gQfMVX95Z7Kt+-=yrLx=A@mail.gmail.com> |
|---|
| In-reply-to | <1382470847.89.0.220614205764.issue17400@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
|---|
| Content |
|---|
Thanks Peter, just a couple more tweaks:- tests need to ensure the carrier private range is neither global *nor*private (it looks to me like they will still show up as private at thispoint)- looks like the docs for is_private still need to be restored (and mentionthe subtlety about deliberately excluding "carrier private").- this is probably worthy of a What's New entry mentioning the new attributeMy apologies for not finding time to review the original patch moreclosely, as that could have saved you a bit of the subsequent runningaround... |
|