Originally reported inhttps://github.com/MagicStack/uvloop/issues/143Future.__init__ shouldn't try to capture the current traceback if the interpreter is being finalized.

Is the problem because traceback_extract_stack is NULL?But this will not fix the problem completely. For example calling repr() on a future can crash because of asyncio_future_repr_info_func == NULL. And many other operations use globals cleared in module_free().

> Is the problem because traceback_extract_stack is NULL?It's not NULL, it's just a broken reference at that point.

Then we should find what callable is NULL and fix the place where it is called. _PyObject_FastCallDict() should never be called with NULL.

> Then we should find what callable is NULL and fix the place where it is called. _PyObject_FastCallDict() should never be called with NULL.My understanding is that the interpreter is being shutdown and half of the objects are freed. We're still holding a reference to *something* in Python space and try calling it.  The obvious fix for that is simply avoid capturing tracebacks if a Future object is created during finalization of the interpreter (it's pointless to capture it anyways at that point).

It is okay if the fact that half of the objects are freed leads to raising exceptions. But an assertion failure is sign of bugs in Python core or the _asyncio module.PR 7080 removes one way of exposing these bugs, but bugs itself still are here, and there may be other ways of triggering a crash.Can this crash be reproduced without uvloop? What is the backtrace of the assertion failure?

> Can this crash be reproduced without uvloop?I am not aware of a way to reproduce this without uvloop.> What is the backtrace of the assertion failure?Without uvloop, the following exception is raised:Exception ignored in: <bound method LoopWrapper.__del__ of <__main__.LoopWrapper object at 0x7fe14ec569b0>>Traceback (most recent call last):  File "uvloop_test.py", line 13, in __del__  File "/usr/lib/python3.6/asyncio/base_events.py", line 276, in create_futureAttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'Future'With uvloop and with Python compiled with --with-pydebug configure option, the failed assertion is mentioned in the original uvloop bug report. In particular, this assertion fails:python3.6-dbg: ../Objects/abstract.c:2300: _PyObject_FastCallDict: Assertion `func != NULL' failed. A full GDB backtrace is attached.

There's nothing specific here to uvloop except the fact that it was compiled with Cython, so module finalization/GC pattern is slightly different to that of vanilla asyncio.Serhiy, I'm merging this PR since I'd like to avoid having segfaults in 3.7.0.  Feel free to debug this further.

New changeset35230d08e09de4e2e52658d5cb09e5b0ca965418 by Yury Selivanov in branch 'master':bpo-33623: Fix possible SIGSGV when asyncio.Future is created in __del__ (#7080)https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/35230d08e09de4e2e52658d5cb09e5b0ca965418

New changeset51d0a2c8ddcb9f58d71ff0a62be4e31a1af3f139 by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.7':bpo-33623: Fix possible SIGSGV when asyncio.Future is created in __del__ (GH-7080)https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/51d0a2c8ddcb9f58d71ff0a62be4e31a1af3f139

Would be great to merge this in 3.7.0.  The change is super safe to merge.

> Would be great to merge this in 3.7.0.  The change is super safe to merge.The 3.7rc1 is not supposed to be tagged on the current 3.7 branch?