MRE```import asyncioasync def generator():    while True:        x = yield 42        print("received", x)        await asyncio.sleep(0.1)async def user(name, g):    print("sending", name)    await g.asend(name)async def helper():    g = generator()    await g.asend(None)    await asyncio.gather(*(user(f"user-{x}", g) for x in range(3)))if __name__ == "__main__":    asyncio.get_event_loop().run_until_complete(helper())```Produces output:```sending user-0received user-0sending user-1sending user-2received Nonereceived None```Expected output (some variance allowed):```sending user-0received user-0sending user-1sending user-2received user-1received user-2```Initial report / discussion:https://mail.python.org/pipermail/async-sig/2017-June/000293.html

@Yuri, this bug doesn't require `gather`, here's a version with futures and explicit await's instead. It produces same output:```import asyncioasync def generator():    while True:        x = yield 42        print("received", x)        await asyncio.sleep(0.1)async def user(name, g):    print("sending", name)    await g.asend(name)async def helper():    g = generator()    await g.asend(None)    u0 = asyncio.ensure_future(user("user-0", g))    u1 = asyncio.ensure_future(user("user-1", g))    u2 = asyncio.ensure_future(user("user-2", g))    await u0    await u1    await u2if __name__ == "__main__":    asyncio.get_event_loop().run_until_complete(helper())```Same with `asyncio.get_event_loop().create_task` as well.

Note that the example can be further simplified by replacing user() with:    async def send_hello(g):        print("sending: hello")        await g.asend("hello")Then the output is:sending: helloreceived hellosending: hellosending: helloreceived Nonereceived None

I've reproduced the problem also in 3.7 branch.```import asyncioloop = asyncio.get_event_loop()async def consumer():    while True:        await asyncio.sleep(0)        message = yield        print('received', message)async def amain():    agenerator = consumer()    await agenerator.asend(None)    fa = asyncio.create_task(agenerator.asend('A'))    fb = asyncio.create_task(agenerator.asend('B'))    await fa    await fbloop.run_until_complete(amain())```Output:```received Areceived None```If the line `await asyncio.sleep(0)` is omitted the output is ok:```received Areceived B```

Thanks Jan. Thanks a lot for a short script to reproduce this bug.The actual problem here is that asynchronous generators don't control their 'asend' and 'athrow' coroutines in any way. So if you have two of them iterating *in parallel* they will cause their asynchronous generator to be in an inconsistent state.The most obvious solution to this problem is to prohibit iterating 'asend'/'athrow' objects in parallel by throwing an exception.  Nathaniel, what are your thoughts on this?

My thoughts:https://bugs.python.org/issue32526#msg309783

Thanks, I'll look into adding ag_running properly.

New changesetfc4a044a3c54ce21e9ed150f7d769fb479d34c49 by Yury Selivanov in branch 'master':bpo-30773: Fix ag_running; prohibit running athrow/asend/aclose in parallel (#7468)https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/fc4a044a3c54ce21e9ed150f7d769fb479d34c49

New changeset2f87a7dc5a1ad7f37787f0adee242c931643f878 by Yury Selivanov (Miss Islington (bot)) in branch '3.8':bpo-30773: Fix ag_running; prohibit running athrow/asend/aclose in parallel (GH-7468) (#16486)https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/2f87a7dc5a1ad7f37787f0adee242c931643f878