IEEE 754, the C99 standard, the Decimal IBM standard and Java all support/specify a 'remainder-near' operation. Apart from being standard, this has a number of useful applications:1. Argument reduction in numerical algorithms: it's common to want to reduce to a range [-modulus/2, modulus/2] rather than [0, modulus).2. Particular case of the above: reduction of angles to lie in the range [-pi, pi]3. Rounding a float x to the nearest multiple of y. This is a much-asked StackOverflow question, and the standard answer of y * round(x / y) risks introducing floating-point error and so can give incorrect results in corner cases. With a remainder operation, it's trivial to do this correctly: x - remainder(x, y) gives the closest representable float to the closest integer multiple of y to x.remainder(x, y) has some nice properties: it's *always* exactly representable (unlike x % y), it satisfies the symmetry remainder(-x, y) == -remainder(x, y), and it's periodic with period 2*y.I have a patch, and will make a PR shortly.

See also Decimal.remainder_near and _PyLong_DivmodNear. Shouldn't the new function be named math.remainder_near?In many cases the function that returns the nearest integer quotient is useful. See Fraction.__round__, datetime._divide_and_round, _pydecimal._div_nearest, etc.

> Shouldn't the new function be named math.remainder_near?Not clear. :-) I'd prefer to keep the name that's consistent with both C and IEEE 754. (We already have plenty of naming differences between Decimal and math; attempting to reconcile them is likely futile.)FTR:IEEE 754: remainderC99: remainderIBM Decimal spec: remainder-nearJava: IEEEremainder.NET: IEEERemainder

> In many cases the function that returns the nearest integer quotient is useful.Agreed, but I'd like to keep the scope of this issue small for now: we're simply wrapping / implementing another C99 math.h function.

FTR, I don't have strong opinions on the name: I could be persuaded by any of `remainder`, `remainder_near` or `ieee_remainder`. I find `ieee_remainder` somewhat more informative than `remainder_near`.

> I'd prefer to keep the name that's consistent with both C and IEEE 754.+1  Also, the decimal module names are a poor guide.  Its usability has been impaired by opaque naming (i.e. needing to use quantize() when you want to round to a fixed number of places).

New changeseta0ce375e10b50f7606cb86b072fed7d8cd574fe7 by Mark Dickinson in branch 'master':bpo-29962: add math.remainder (#950)https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/a0ce375e10b50f7606cb86b072fed7d8cd574fe7