➜
This issue trackerhas been migrated toGitHub, and is currentlyread-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on2008-03-17 17:38 bybrett.cannon, last changed2022-04-11 14:56 byadmin. This issue is nowclosed.
| Files | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| File name | Uploaded | Description | Edit | |
| backport_set_literal.diff | alexandre.vassalotti,2009-08-04 22:28 | |||
| Messages (9) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg63692 -(view) | Author: Brett Cannon (brett.cannon)* | Date: 2008-03-17 17:38 | |
Set literals need to be backported. | |||
| msg70455 -(view) | Author: Benjamin Peterson (benjamin.peterson)* | Date: 2008-07-31 01:52 | |
I'm going to defer this to 2.7. | |||
| msg91279 -(view) | Author: Alexandre Vassalotti (alexandre.vassalotti)* | Date: 2009-08-04 22:28 | |
Here is a patch for backporting set literals to the trunk. | |||
| msg91280 -(view) | Author: Raymond Hettinger (rhettinger)* | Date: 2009-08-04 22:36 | |
Guido, I thought you had decided for this to just be a 3.x feature.Alex, if this goes forward, were you also going to change the repr() forsets and the corresponding pprint code? Are set comprehensions on theradar screen also. IMO, these all go hand in hand. | |||
| msg91284 -(view) | Author: Alexandre Vassalotti (alexandre.vassalotti)* | Date: 2009-08-04 23:27 | |
I think we should keep the repr() of sets as is to avoid breaking anycode. And yes, I plan to port set comprehensions along with dictcomprehension. | |||
| msg91289 -(view) | Author: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum)* | Date: 2009-08-05 00:35 | |
Raymond, I know you see this differently, but personally I don't see aproblem with 2.7 getting additional backports of 3.x features, as longas they are backwards compatible. While personally I wouldn't spendeffort on this particular backport, I don't see a problem when someonevolunteers a patch. In this specific case, I am fine with accepting setliterals and set comprehensions as new syntax. I do agree that repr()needs to be kept the same as it was under 2.6. | |||
| msg91294 -(view) | Author: Raymond Hettinger (rhettinger)* | Date: 2009-08-05 01:53 | |
These all seem fine to me. Was just checking in because I thought youhad previously pronounced otherwise. | |||
| msg96256 -(view) | Author: Alexandre Vassalotti (alexandre.vassalotti)* | Date: 2009-12-11 14:11 | |
If there are no objections, I will commit this patch later this week. | |||
| msg97478 -(view) | Author: Alexandre Vassalotti (alexandre.vassalotti)* | Date: 2010-01-09 23:37 | |
It been a long week, but this patch is now committed asr77400. | |||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:56:31 | admin | set | github: 46588 |
| 2010-01-09 23:37:29 | alexandre.vassalotti | set | status: open -> closed resolution: accepted messages: +msg97478 stage: patch review -> resolved |
| 2009-12-11 14:11:00 | alexandre.vassalotti | set | messages: +msg96256 |
| 2009-08-05 23:12:32 | alexandre.vassalotti | link | issue2333 dependencies |
| 2009-08-05 01:53:13 | rhettinger | set | messages: +msg91294 |
| 2009-08-05 00:35:13 | gvanrossum | set | assignee:gvanrossum -> messages: +msg91289 |
| 2009-08-04 23:27:33 | alexandre.vassalotti | set | messages: +msg91284 |
| 2009-08-04 22:36:59 | rhettinger | set | priority: critical -> normal nosy: +gvanrossum,rhettinger messages: +msg91280 assignee:gvanrossum |
| 2009-08-04 22:28:10 | alexandre.vassalotti | set | files: +backport_set_literal.diff nosy: +alexandre.vassalotti messages: +msg91279 keywords: +patch stage: patch review |
| 2008-07-31 01:52:31 | benjamin.peterson | set | nosy: +benjamin.peterson messages: +msg70455 versions: + Python 2.7, - Python 2.6 |
| 2008-03-17 20:10:26 | brett.cannon | set | priority: release blocker -> critical |
| 2008-03-17 17:38:45 | brett.cannon | create | |