
This issue trackerhas been migrated toGitHub, and is currentlyread-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on2014-11-14 17:34 byJoseph.Siddall, last changed2022-04-11 14:58 byadmin. This issue is nowclosed.
| Files | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| File name | Uploaded | Description | Edit | |
| issue22872.patch | zvyn,2015-06-13 05:11 | review | ||
| Pull Requests | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| URL | Status | Linked | Edit |
| PR 9010 | merged | ZackerySpytz,2018-08-30 20:50 | |
| Messages (7) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg231164 -(view) | Author: Joseph Siddall (Joseph.Siddall) | Date: 2014-11-14 17:34 | |
putting something in Queue(multiprocessing.Queue) after closing it raises an AssertionError.Getting something out of a Queue after closing it raises an OSError.I expected both scenarios to raise the same exception.To Reproduce:>>> from multiprocessing import Queue>>> q = Queue()>>> q.close()>>> q.put("ok")Traceback (most recent call last):...AssertionError>>> from multiprocessing import Queue>>> q = Queue()>>> q.close()>>> q.get()Traceback (most recent call last):...OSError: handle is closed | |||
| msg245291 -(view) | Author: Milan Oberkirch (zvyn)* | Date: 2015-06-13 05:11 | |
Here is the trivial patch for that :) | |||
| msg251178 -(view) | Author: Davin Potts (davin)*![]() | Date: 2015-09-20 22:21 | |
The proposed patch would potentially break existing code which anticipates the current behavior. The potential negative impact means this particular proposed patch is not viable.Choices forward include: (1) better documenting the existing, established implementation behavior (perhaps having the assert provide a more informative message), or (2) altering the behavior in a new release version (perhaps 3.6 when it comes) and documenting that change appropriately there.As to what sort of exception we should expect in this situation, unfortunately comparing to the queue module's Queue does not help guide expectations much since it does not have need of a close().Of the two above options, I'm more inclined towards the first. Does @Joseph.Siddall have other motivations that helped motivate this suggested improvement? | |||
| msg258737 -(view) | Author: Berker Peksag (berker.peksag)*![]() | Date: 2016-01-21 07:20 | |
Seeissue 5001 for more general cleanup in multiprocessing.> [...] (2) altering the behavior in a new release version (perhaps 3.6 when it comes) and documenting that change appropriately there.+1. We can also document AssertionError in older Python versions. | |||
| msg313790 -(view) | Author: Antoine Pitrou (pitrou)*![]() | Date: 2018-03-13 22:31 | |
The expected behaviour here would be to raise ValueError, as on other closed objects:>>> s = io.StringIO()>>> s.close()>>> s.write("")Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>ValueError: I/O operation on closed file | |||
| msg327644 -(view) | Author: Serhiy Storchaka (serhiy.storchaka)*![]() | Date: 2018-10-13 09:26 | |
New changeset0461704060474cb358d3495322950c4fd00616a0 by Serhiy Storchaka (Zackery Spytz) in branch 'master':bpo-22872: multiprocessing.Queue's put() and get() now raise ValueError if the queue is closed. (GH-9010)https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/0461704060474cb358d3495322950c4fd00616a0 | |||
| msg327979 -(view) | Author: Serhiy Storchaka (serhiy.storchaka)*![]() | Date: 2018-10-18 12:55 | |
I don't think we need to document AssertionError in older Python versions. This is an implementation detail. We don't document all exceptions that can be raised with improper use of the API. Just don't do this.In addition, using the assert statement for validating user input or the object state which depends on user actions is a bad style. We shouldn't encourage this by documenting it as a behavior of the stdlib. It was a bug, and it is fixed now. | |||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:58:10 | admin | set | github: 67061 |
| 2018-10-18 12:55:10 | serhiy.storchaka | set | status: open -> closed resolution: fixed messages: +msg327979 stage: patch review -> resolved |
| 2018-10-13 09:26:14 | serhiy.storchaka | set | nosy: +serhiy.storchaka messages: +msg327644 |
| 2018-08-30 20:56:27 | ZackerySpytz | set | nosy: +ZackerySpytz |
| 2018-08-30 20:50:02 | ZackerySpytz | set | stage: needs patch -> patch review pull_requests: +pull_request8480 |
| 2018-08-28 19:47:24 | xtreak | set | nosy: +xtreak |
| 2018-03-13 22:31:22 | pitrou | set | components: + Library (Lib), - ctypes |
| 2018-03-13 22:31:13 | pitrou | set | nosy: +pitrou messages: +msg313790 versions: + Python 3.8, - Python 3.6 |
| 2018-01-22 21:16:13 | jqian | set | components: + ctypes, - Library (Lib) versions: - Python 3.4, Python 3.5 |
| 2016-01-21 07:20:48 | berker.peksag | set | messages: +msg258737 stage: needs patch |
| 2015-09-20 22:21:08 | davin | set | type: behavior -> enhancement messages: +msg251178 stage: patch review -> (no value) |
| 2015-07-21 07:10:09 | ethan.furman | set | nosy: -ethan.furman |
| 2015-06-13 08:53:17 | berker.peksag | set | nosy: +berker.peksag stage: patch review versions: + Python 3.5, Python 3.6 |
| 2015-06-13 05:11:49 | zvyn | set | files: +issue22872.patch nosy: +zvyn messages: +msg245291 keywords: +patch |
| 2015-02-22 19:51:31 | davin | set | nosy: +davin |
| 2014-11-14 17:35:54 | ethan.furman | set | nosy: +jnoller,ethan.furman,sbt |
| 2014-11-14 17:34:48 | Joseph.Siddall | create | |