On some systems (specifically, Linux), the rename system call will throwan EXDEV error if rename is used across filesystems.  It would be convenient for the user if os.rename were extended to handle this transparently (like most mv commands do).The benefits of this. . .getting rid of code like the following:try:    os.rename('ff','/tmp/ff')except:    open('/tmp/ff','w').write(open('ff','r').read())    os.unlink('ff')Actually, the real benefit is that code (written by morons like myself) using os.rename will continue to work even after the administrator moves the target directory to another filesystem.I took a quick look at posixmodule.c.  A quick hack changes posix_2str'ssignature to the following:PyObject *argschar *formatint (*func)(const char*, const char *)int (*special_handler)(const char *, const char *)and the inner function to:if (res != 0)    if ((! special_handler) || (*special_handler)(path1,path2))         return posix_error()Of course, then a smart copy routine (includes an unlink step).  The most unclear thing at this point is what to do with the errno.  Would a failure inthe errorhandler report the original errno or its own errno???Personally, a more general solution would allow the user (python-level) to optionally pass in *their own* error handling function/method.

revisit this after 2.0

Please do triage on this bug.

Moved toPEP 42 as a feature request for a post-2.0 version of Python.

Copying files (and directories) properly is a very platform specific task -- there are lots of pitfalls that the copying code has to watch out for, e.g. copying files with "holes", properly copying all metadata, copying special files... I think that the os.rename() call is not the proper place to implement all this. But it's a useful feature nevertheless, and could perhaps be accommodated by a higher level function in the shutil module (which has the basic copying primitives).

Logged In: NO also unix weenies expect rename() to be atomic. makingit non-atomic can break lots of code that is carefullycrafted to survive nfs, or do locking with rename(), etc.

Logged In: YES user_id=25413Since Python 2.3 the shutil module has a move function that implements this functionality.

Logged In: YES user_id=2772I saw this item inPEP42 and I'd also like to be on therecord against making os.rename() do fancy stuff.  If youwant shutil.move, you know where to find it.  As "nobody"mentions, we unix people know exactly what rename(2) does,and we want os.rename() to be a thin wrapper over it.