This issue is part of the Great Argument Clinic Conversion Derby,where we're trying to convert as much of Python 3.4 to useArgument Clinic as we can before Release Candidate 1 on January 19.This issue asks you to change the following bundle of files:Modules/_collectionsmodule.c: 4 sitesModules/itertoolsmodule.c: 11 sitesModules/_randommodule.c: 1 sitesObjects/unicodeobject.c: 14 sitesModules/xxlimited.c: 4 sitesModules/xxmodule.c: 5 sitesModules/xxsubtype.c: 5 sitesObjects/stringlib/find.h: 1 sitesObjects/stringlib/transmogrify.h: 5 sitesTalk to me (larry) if you only want to attack part of a bundle.For instructions on how to convert a function to work with ArgumentClinic, read the "howto":http://docs.python.org/dev/howto/clinic.html

I'm attaching my conversion of deque.rotate and _count_elements inModules/_collectionsmodule.c.There remain 3 other functions in that module to be converted.One is deque_init which returns int; Larry said (on IRC) to hold off with that for now.The other two are dequeiter_new and dequereviter_new, which use the O! format, which I am unsure how to handle.

Attaching patch for complete conversion ofObjects/unicodeobject.c.Notes:* maketrans() was already converted* converting the lstrip, rstrip and strip methods required a small, non-trivial change to the code, since they used a common function for argument parsing* the documentation for replace() now correctly reflects the actual function signature* I rephrased some doc-strings where it was required, and in several places moved some of the text into parameter descriptions

Attached patch for AC conversion ofObjects/stringlib/transmogrify.h.Converting the functions in this file required changes toObjects/bytesobject.c andObjects/bytearrayobject.c. Those changes are in the patch as well. The conversion of those files is part ofissue20179 (Derby #10). I'm adding a comment on that issue as well with a reference to this.

Attaching a new patch for complete conversion ofObjects/unicodeobject.c.This is to replace the previous patch for this file.This new patch also converts all other possible unicode methods,including those not using PyArg_* functions. This includes variousmethods with no arguments or with one PyObject* argument.Unicode methods still not converted, probably impossible to convert:1) The various find methods (index, count, startswith, rfind, etc.),   because they use a special function   'stringlib_parse_args_finds_unicode' to parse their arguments2) format and format_map, since they are defined elsewhere3) _decimal2ascii, since it is just for debugging

Attached nearly complete conversion ofModules/_collectionsmodule.c.I've converted all functions using PyArg_* functions, including __new__ methods, but not deque.__init__.I'm attaching a separate patch for deque.__init__.

Attached a patch converting deque.__init__ inModules/_collectionsmodule.c, which completes the conversion of this file.This patch depends Larry's first patch inissue20341 (Argument Clinic: add "nullable ints"). This functionality is used to simplify the existing code for accepting None for the 'maxlen' argument to deque.__init__. If needed I can supply a patch which does not depend on Larry's patch.

Attached is a complete conversion ofModules/_randommodule.c. Three _random.Random methods were converted: seed, getrandbits and __new__.There's was an problem converting _random.Random.__new__. I overcame it cleanly and think this patch is good. Details about the problem follow.issue1486663 made various __new__ methods of built-in classes only do a '_PyArg_NoKeywords' check if the type is the class itself, i.e. not for sub-classes. This is to allow sub-classes to accept keyword arguments.This means that for classes that do this, like _random.Random, converting using AC makes it so subclasses can't accept keyword arguments (unless the subclasses implement __new__ properly).Still, it is possible to convert _random.Random.__new__ and also override __new__ in random.Random (random != _random, and random.Random subclasses _random.Random). This way subclasses of the latter can accept keyword arguments. Since anyone sub-classing _random.Random instead of random.Random can be expected to know to override __new__ or switch to random.Random, I think this is a good solution for this case.The attached patch does as I suggest above and passes all tests in test_random, including 'test_random_subclass_with_kwargs' which checks this issue. Just to be sure, I also ran the entire test suite, and all tests pass.

Attached complete conversion ofModules/xxlimited.c,Modules/xxmodule.c andModules/xxsubtype.c.There are no tests for these and the code is not used by anything AFAIK, so I was extra careful and went over the diffs manually once everything was done.

I think we should probably not convert xx*.c. They are for newcomerswho will likely be confused by the additional information overload.

I thought AC was how all new modules were supposed to be written. If so, the example modules should definitely use AC!Also note that once the generated code is in separate files, the code in the origin files will be simpler and clearer.

The vast majority of C modules are in third-party packages. I doubt that externalmodules will all use AC. xxmodule.c is about explaining the basic structure ofa C extension.  AC adds nothing to this and obfuscates (IMO) what is going on.

Thanks, Stefan. I hadn't realized that the xx files were targeted mainly a third-party developers. In this case, I can see the sense in not converting them.I only wish someone had said something *before* I went ahead and converted them...

> I only wish someone had said something *before* I went ahead and converted them...Yeah, sorry. It's also just my personal opinion.  BTW, xxmodule did not compileand there was a warning for xxsubtype.  I just mention it in case these are ACissues.

When AC moves from internal-only tool to supported tool we'll want to convert the xx stuff.  But yeah I reckon it makes sense to not convert them yet.  The list of files is really more "here's the list of stuff to check out and convert if necessary".  best judgement is always called for.

Attached is a complete AC conversion of itertools.This is a large conversion, so I was extra careful. I even went over the entire diff manually to check for any errors. Compilation runs without warnings and the entire test suite passes.Notes:* I didn't convert itertools.repeat due to the ongoing discussion regarding it.* I didn't convert itertools.islice since its signature is like range() but with an additional first required argument, making it impossible to convert properly.* I didn't convert several __new__ methods because they treat *args similarly to zip(): itertools.chain, itertools.product, itertools.zip_longest* I used Larry's "nullable ints" patch (seeissue20341) for the 'r' parameter to itertools.permutations.* I converted all of the following methods when defined: __new__ (except for classes mentioned above), __sizeof__, __reduce__, __setstate__, __copy__, __length_hint__

And at that, I've finished the conversion of this entire Derby group! Woohoo!(except for itertools.repeat which is pending discussion)

For the unicodeobject changes, see Rietveld. In addition, it produces many cast errors from PyUnicodeObject* to PyObject*. Otherwise, it looks fine - please apply (after these fixes).

All the Derby patches should only go into trunk at this point.

Sadly, for political reasons, it's best that we not convert collections, itertools, or random for now.  I'll update this issue if the situation changes.  Sorry about that!

Attaching new patch for unicodeobject.c, which supersedes the previous patches.I've changed the name of the parameter of str.join() to "iterable" to match the docs. (In the previous patch I had changed it from "seq" to "iterable_of_strings".)I also fixed two minor comments on the doc strings from Martin.With this, AFAIK, unicodeobject.c should be good to go.

Here's a new patch forObjects/unicodeobject.c with all of Serhiy's suggestions integrated.

The patch causes a lot of warnings likeObjects/unicodeobject.c: In function ‘unicode_title_impl’:Objects/unicodeobject.c:10581:5: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘_PyUnicode_Ready’ from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default]     if (PyUnicode_READY(self) == -1)     ^Objects/unicodeobject.c:1484:1: note: expected ‘struct PyObject *’ but argument is of type ‘struct PyUnicodeObject *’ _PyUnicode_Ready(PyObject *unicode) ^

Version of patch with PyUnicodeObject * warnings fixed.

unicodeobject.c.v5.patch LGTM.

Hurrah!And that seems to be it for this group, since collections, itertools and random are not to be converted at this point, as well as theModules/xx*.c files, and the stringlib files probably require overly extensive changes for conversion.

> Sadly, for political reasons, it's best that we not convert collections, itertools, or random for now.Well, there are also technical reasons.  For example, when reviewing a huge patch at the beginning of this year, the sections that touched AC took me 10 times longer to review than the rest.

For now almost all generated code are written in separate file, so it doesn't attract attention (if you believe Argument Clinic).

So I'm confused. Is this applicable or not? Its in commit review, but there's discussion of politics here :(.

Summary of the current state of this AC conversion derby group:1) The collections, itertools and random modules should not be converted (at least for now).2) The three example modules should not be converted (Modules/xxlimited.c,Modules/xxmodule.c andModules/xxsubtype.c).3) The latest unicodeobject.c patch has a LGTM from Serhiy after several rounds of review and improvement. This should probably go in at some point.4) The single PyArg_ParseTuple in find.h should not be converted, since that is actually used for more than a single find() method via some precompiler macro "magic".5) transmogrify.h can be converted and has a conversion patch, but the patch likely needs updating since it is from Jan. 2014.

Ok, so will someone commit 3), or would you like me to do so? After that it sounds like we can move this back to patch review, since there will be nothing left ready for commit.

I'll commit #3 (unicodeobject.c) when I first get the chance, which should be in a few days.I'll be happy to improve the rest as needed if someone can find the time to review them!

Updated patch for unicodeobject.@taleinat, could you confirm it?

transmogrify.h uses hack to share docstring.I can't find straightforward way.

Unfortunately, I won't be able to review this due to lack of time.

Serhiy Storchaka, would you review again?Merging unicodeobject.c.v5.patch into default branch was almost straightforward.But there was one place I should rewrite.  Here is the part of diff -u v5.patch v6.patch-- is old docstring w/o AC+- is current docstring w/o AC-+ is AC in v5 patch++ is AC in v6 patch -PyDoc_STRVAR(translate__doc__, -             "S.translate(table) -> str\n\ -\n\--Return a copy of the string S, where all characters have been mapped\n\--through the given translation table, which must be a mapping of\n\--Unicode ordinals to Unicode ordinals, strings, or None.\n\--Unmapped characters are left untouched. Characters mapped to None\n\--are deleted.");+-Return a copy of the string S in which each character has been mapped\n\+-through the given translation table. The table must implement\n\+-lookup/indexing via __getitem__, for instance a dictionary or list,\n\+-mapping Unicode ordinals to Unicode ordinals, strings, or None. If\n\+-this operation raises LookupError, the character is left untouched.\n\+-Characters mapped to None are deleted."); - -static PyObject* +/*[clinic input]@@ -1194,14 +1271,14 @@ + +Replace each character in the string using the given translation table. +-+Characters not in the translation table are left untouched.-+-+Characters mapped to None are deleted.++The table must implement lookup/indexing via __getitem__, for instance a++dictionary or list.  If this operation raises LookupError, the character is++left untouched.  Characters mapped to None are deleted. +[clinic start generated code]*/

LGTM again.

New changeset27dc9a1c061e by INADA Naoki in branch 'default':Issue#20180: convert unicode methods to AC.https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/27dc9a1c061e

Thank you, Martin and Serhiy.Ashttp://bugs.python.org/issue20180#msg247987 , remained module to convertedis transmogrify.h.But docstrings of methods in transmogrify.h were moved to bytes_methods.c inissue26765.May I close this issue for now?

Seems you haven't updated generated AC files.

New changeset01b06ca45f64 by INADA Naoki in branch 'default':Issue#20180: forgot to update AC output.https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/01b06ca45f64

Uhhh!  I'm sorry.

For str.format_map(mapping), yes the parsing happens inObjects/stringlib/unicode_format.h, but I don’t see that as a big problem. Moving this back to “needs patch”, assuming it is okay to convert format_map().Other than from that, there are just tricky things left like the str() constructor, str.format(*args, **kwargs) (seeIssue 20291), and the shared code inObjects/stringlib/find.h andObjects/stringlib/transmogrify.h. I don’t know what to do about those.

Seems Raymond have changed his mind about using Argument Clinic in itertools (msg302908). Tal, do you mind to update your itertools patch and create a pull request?

Id be happy to update the itertools patch.I haven't been following AC work for quite a while. I would expect this to entail:1. applying the patch to the master branch2. merging any conflicts3. running the clinic.py script again4. review the output and compare it to the previous output to make sure things look okayWould you also prefer this in the form of a GitHub PR?

All correct. The final patch should be in the form of GitHub PR.Don't specify the self parameter explicitly, just rename the corresponding variable. The rest of the patch LGTM.

What about islice? Does AC now support complex enough signatures to support it? If not, should I leave the comment as is?

Keep islice() non-converted. For the r parameter of permutations() use "r: object = None".

As far as I can tell, with the creation of a separate clinic/itertools.c.h, the typedefs etc. need to be moved to the top of the file so that the #include can come after the typedefs and before the rest of the code which references clinic output. Is this indeed the way to go?

Yes, it is. Actually the #include should be before lists of methods and static PyTypeObject initializers. I think it is better to move all method lists and type initializers to the bottom of the file.

SeePR 4117 on GitHub with the itertools AC conversion.

To enable progressing with this in smaller steps, I createdPR 4170 which converts only itertools.groupby and the intertnal _grouper with minimal required changes.

IMO we should create new issues for AC conversion of the collections and random modules (assuming they haven't been converted yet), and close this issue.

> IMO we should create new issues for AC conversion of the collections and random modules (assuming they haven't been converted yet), and close this issue.I agree with you. Let's finish derby.

See updated PR forObjects/stringlib/transmogrify.h inGH-8039.

New changesetc929df3b96c8d7e7977e581431192be21cdafd19 by Tal Einat in branch 'master':bpo-20180: complete AC conversion ofObjects/stringlib/transmogrify.h (GH-8039)https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/c929df3b96c8d7e7977e581431192be21cdafd19

Now that transmogrify is done, the only open question is about itertools and collections.1. Should collections be converted?2. How to proceed with itertools? There are two PRs ready, with the one just for groupby() approved, but not yet reviewed by Raymond Hettinger.

New changeset3286ce4adee85c5ce8ab3ee3089f3cd44a017fd7 by Raymond Hettinger (Tal Einat) in branch 'master':bpo-20180: itertools.groupby Argument Clinic conversion (GH-4170)https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/3286ce4adee85c5ce8ab3ee3089f3cd44a017fd7

New changesetc4bccd3c7617018b1ce16f95840ffe1a890d44df by Raymond Hettinger (Tal Einat) in branch 'master':bpo-20180: convert most of itertoolsmodule.c to use Argument Clinic (GH-9164)https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/c4bccd3c7617018b1ce16f95840ffe1a890d44df

Now just the collections module is left from this group.Raymond, what would you like done with it WRT AC conversion, if at all?

> Now just the collections module is left from this group.> Raymond, what would you like done with it WRT AC conversion,> if at all?I would like to pass on the collections module.  Having looked at the patch, I think the code is currently better as is.That bring this one Derby to a close.  Congratulations :-)

New changeset65ce60aef150776f884715b4315a10a0d6ae769e by Serhiy Storchaka in branch 'master':bpo-20180: Simplify char_converter in Argument Clinic. (GH-9828)https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/65ce60aef150776f884715b4315a10a0d6ae769e

New changeset9e4f2f3a6b8ee995c365e86d976937c141d867f8 by Inada Naoki in branch 'master':bpo-20180: Use argument clinic for dict.pop() and dict.popitem() (GH-12792)https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/9e4f2f3a6b8ee995c365e86d976937c141d867f8