
This issue trackerhas been migrated toGitHub, and is currentlyread-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on2013-04-16 11:32 bydoko, last changed2022-04-11 14:57 byadmin. This issue is nowclosed.
| Messages (11) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg187073 -(view) | Author: Matthias Klose (doko)*![]() | Date: 2013-04-16 11:32 | |
no idea yet about that one ...======================================================================FAIL: test_syntax_error (test.test_code_module.TestInteractiveConsole)----------------------------------------------------------------------Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python3.3/test/test_code_module.py", line 57, in test_syntax_error raise AssertionError("No syntax error from console")AssertionError: No syntax error from console | |||
| msg199788 -(view) | Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl)*![]() | Date: 2013-10-13 20:13 | |
Can't reproduce with current 3.3 tip. | |||
| msg217917 -(view) | Author: Matthias Klose (doko)*![]() | Date: 2014-05-05 11:58 | |
seen this again in our autopkg testerhttps://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/Utopic/view/AutoPkgTest/job/utopic-adt-python3.4/12/however now I can't reproduce this locally, and the test succeeds during the build. | |||
| msg217924 -(view) | Author: Martin Pitt (pitti) | Date: 2014-05-05 13:50 | |
I can reproduce this here. In that test, I added the following: with open('/tmp/debug', 'w') as f: for call in self.stderr.method_calls: f.write('call: %s\n' % str(call)) This gives:=========== 8< ============call: call.write('Python <MagicMock name=\'sys.version\' id=\'140431558254320\'> on <MagicMock name=\'sys.platform\' id=\'140431558262512\'>\nType "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.\n(InteractiveConsole)\n')call: call.write('Traceback (most recent call last):\n')call: call.write(' File "/usr/lib/python3.4/code.py", line 90, in runcode\n')call: call.write(' ')call: call.write('exec(code, self.locals)')call: call.write('\n')call: call.write(' File "<console>", line 1, in <module>\n')call: call.write('NameError')call: call.write(': ')call: call.write("name 'undefined' is not defined")call: call.write('\n')call: call.write('\n')=========== 8< ============Observe that the test checks if 'NameError:' in ''.join(call[1]):but the "NameError" and the ":" are in two different call lines. I don't know how self.stderr.method_calls is built, but this sounds like a race condition/timing or a stdin/out buffering issue? I. e. the original print that produces the "NameError:" certainly does that in two steps; perhaps the testsuite thing that repeatedly read()s on stderr catches these two as separate write()s then? | |||
| msg218086 -(view) | Author: Matthias Klose (doko)*![]() | Date: 2014-05-07 22:05 | |
adding unittest developers | |||
| msg218319 -(view) | Author: Michael Foord (michael.foord)*![]() | Date: 2014-05-12 12:11 | |
It looks like the simplest fix would be to change "NameError:" to "NameError", as the problem is that they're (sometimes!?) on separate lines.This still tests what we want to test. | |||
| msg218320 -(view) | Author: Matthias Klose (doko)*![]() | Date: 2014-05-12 12:17 | |
sure, doing this. my follow-up question was if it is necessary to fix anything else in unittest. | |||
| msg218422 -(view) | Author: Roundup Robot (python-dev)![]() | Date: 2014-05-13 09:30 | |
New changeset20db5e9086d4 by doko in branch '3.4':- Issue#17756: Fix test_code test when run from the installed location.http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/20db5e9086d4New changeset8885fc2e92b3 by doko in branch 'default':Merge from 3.4:http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/8885fc2e92b3 | |||
| msg218423 -(view) | Author: Matthias Klose (doko)*![]() | Date: 2014-05-13 09:32 | |
not yet closing, to see if there are some stream buffering issues in mock | |||
| msg251026 -(view) | Author: Terry J. Reedy (terry.reedy)*![]() | Date: 2015-09-18 21:00 | |
In the absence of any further issue in over a year, can this be closed? | |||
| msg257278 -(view) | Author: Ezio Melotti (ezio.melotti)*![]() | Date: 2016-01-01 05:47 | |
I'm going to close this since the reported issue has been fixed.In the test sys.stderr was mocked, and Mock.method_calls simply records the calls done to the mock. Therefore the fact that 'NameError' and ':' were written on sys.stderr on two separate calls to write() is not a problem with mocks. | |||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:57:44 | admin | set | github: 61956 |
| 2016-01-01 05:47:35 | ezio.melotti | set | status: open -> closed type: behavior nosy: +rbcollins messages: +msg257278 resolution: out of date -> fixed stage: needs patch -> resolved |
| 2015-09-18 21:00:25 | terry.reedy | set | nosy: +terry.reedy messages: +msg251026 |
| 2014-05-13 09:32:39 | doko | set | messages: +msg218423 |
| 2014-05-13 09:30:45 | python-dev | set | nosy: +python-dev messages: +msg218422 |
| 2014-05-12 12:17:57 | doko | set | messages: +msg218320 |
| 2014-05-12 12:11:27 | michael.foord | set | messages: +msg218319 |
| 2014-05-07 22:05:02 | doko | set | nosy: +ezio.melotti,michael.foord messages: +msg218086 |
| 2014-05-05 13:50:45 | pitti | set | nosy: +pitti messages: +msg217924 |
| 2014-05-05 11:58:54 | doko | set | status: pending -> open messages: +msg217917 |
| 2013-10-13 20:13:48 | georg.brandl | set | status: open -> pending nosy: +georg.brandl messages: +msg199788 resolution: out of date |
| 2013-04-16 11:32:57 | doko | link | issue17750 dependencies |
| 2013-04-16 11:32:39 | doko | create | |