Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Language selection

/Gouvernement du Canada
Search

Menus

Patent 2455439 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent:(11) CA 2455439(54) English Title:DEVICE VIEWABLE UNDER AN IMAGING BEAM(54) French Title:DISPOSITIF VISIBLE SOUS UN FAISCEAU D'IMAGERIEStatus:Term Expired - Post Grant Beyond Limit
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • A61L 27/34 (2006.01)
  • A61F 2/82 (2013.01)
  • A61L 27/04 (2006.01)
  • A61L 27/10 (2006.01)
  • A61L 27/50 (2006.01)
  • A61L 27/54 (2006.01)
  • A61L 31/10 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • KIERAN P. MURPHY(United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • KIERAN MURPHY LLC
(71) Applicants :
  • KIERAN P. MURPHY (United States of America)
(74) Agent:PERRY + CURRIER
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:2014-02-11
(22) Filed Date:2004-01-20
(41) Open to Public Inspection:2004-09-24
Examination requested:2009-01-15
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT):No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No.Country/TerritoryDate
10/394,007(United States of America)2003-03-24
10/727,667(United States of America)2003-12-05
2,423,735(Canada)2003-03-24

Abstracts

English Abstract

The invention provides a stent made from a material operable to perform a stent's desired therapeutic functions, and also made from a material that has a radiopacity that substantially preserves the appearance of the stent when the stent is viewed under a CT imaging beam. Such a stent can allow for follow-up of the stent and the surrounding blood- vessel on CT.


French Abstract

L'invention présente un implant fait d'un matériau fonctionnel pour réaliser les fonctions thérapeutiques attendues d'un implant et aussi fait d'un matériau ayant une radio-opacité qui préserve de manière substantielle l'apparence de l'implant lorsque l'implant est vu sous un faisceau d'imagerie de tomographie. Un tel implant permet un suivi de l'implant et des vaisseaux sanguins l'entourant sur un tomodensitogramme.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.

<br/>What is claimed is:<br/>1. A stent made from a material for providing three-dimensional <br/>visualization of a <br/>surrounding tissue when said stent is inserted into said tissue and viewed <br/>under <br/>an imaging beam, said stent having a coating selected from a group consisting <br/>of <br/>hydrophilic, hydrophobic and fatty acid polymers and a density enhancing <br/>radiologic material embedded into said polymer.<br/>2. The stent according to claim 1 wherein said coating comprises a <br/>restenosis <br/>inhibiting drug.<br/>3. The stent according to claim 1 wherein said density enhancing radiologic <br/>material <br/>is a lyophilizied iodinated contrast agent.<br/>4. The stent according to claim 1 wherein said density enhancing radiologic <br/>material <br/>is a tungsten, tantalum, or barium contrast agent.<br/>5. The stent according to claim 1 wherein said density enhancing radiologic <br/>material <br/>is a gadolinium based contrast agent,<br/>6. The stent according to claim 1 wherein said density enhancing radiologic <br/>material <br/>is a lipiodol or ethiodol based contrast agent.<br/><br/>7. The stent according to claim 1 wherein said material is selected from <br/>the group <br/>consisting of inconel and metal glass.<br/>8. The stent according to claim 1 wherein said material is selected from <br/>the group <br/>consisting of nitinol and stainless steel.<br/>9. The stent according to claim 1 wherein said material is selected from <br/>the group <br/>consisting of a plastic, composite carbon fiber, Inconel, and radio lucent <br/>material.<br/>10. The stent of claim 1, wherein said stent elutes said density enhancing <br/>material by <br/>bulk erosion, such that said stent has increased visibility when viewed under <br/>an <br/>imaging beam than said stent prior to elution.<br/>11. The stent of claim 1, wherein said stent elutes said density enhancing <br/>material by <br/>surface erosion, such that said stent has increased visibility when viewed <br/>under <br/>an imaging beam than said stent prior to elution.<br/>12. The stent of claim 1, wherein said stent elutes said density enhancing <br/>material by <br/>diffusion, such that said stent has increased visibility when viewed under an <br/>imaging beam than said stent prior to elution.<br/>18<br/><br/>13. The stent of claim 1, wherein said stent elutes said density enhancing <br/>material by <br/>degradation, such that said stent has increased visibility when viewed under <br/>an <br/>imaging beam than said stent prior to elution<br/>14. The stent of any one of claims 10-13, wherein said imaging beam is CT.<br/>15. The stent of any one of claims 10-13, wherein said imaging beam is MR.<br/>16. The stent of any one of claims 10-15, wherein said stent further <br/>includes a <br/>restenosis inhibiting drug.<br/>17 A stent, comprising:<br/>a material having structure to provide three-dimensional visualization of a<br/>surrounding tissue when said stent is inserted into said tissue and viewed<br/>under an imaging beam,<br/>said stent having:<br/>(i) a single coating layer selected from a group consisting of:<br/>(i) (a) a hydrophilic polymer,<br/>(i) (b) a hydrophobic polymer, and<br/>(i) (c) a fatty acid polymer, and<br/>(ii) a density enhancing radiologic opacifier embedded into said single <br/>coating<br/>layer, said single coating layer and said embedded opacifier material together<br/>providing a first Hounsfield image density for viewing under a first image <br/>modality<br/>17<br/><br/>used during device insertion into a patient, and wherein said density <br/>enhancing <br/>radiologic opacifier material is configured to elute from said single coating <br/>layer <br/>so as to provide a second Hounsfield image density for viewing under a second <br/>image modality used for subsequent visualization of surrounding tissue, <br/>wherein <br/>the stent has an image density of less than about 1200 Hounsfield Units.<br/>18. The stent according to claim 17, wherein said density enhancing <br/>radiologic <br/>opacifier material comprises a lyophilized iodinated contrast material.<br/>19. The stent according to claim 17, wherein said material is selected from <br/>the group <br/>consisting of a plastic and a polymeric material.<br/>20. The stent of claim 17, wherein said stent is configured to elute said <br/>density <br/>enhancing radiologic opacifier material by bulk erosion, such that said stent <br/>has <br/>increased visibility than said stent prior to elution.<br/>21. The stent of claim 20, wherein said imaging beam comprises MR.<br/>22. The stent of claim 17, wherein said stent is configured to elute said <br/>density <br/>enhancing radiologic opacifier material by surface erosion, such that said <br/>stent <br/>has increased visibility when viewed under an imaging beam than said stent <br/>prior <br/>to elution.<br/>18<br/><br/>23. The stent of claim 17, wherein said stent is configured to elute said <br/>density <br/>enhancing radiologic opacifier material by diffusion, such that said stent has <br/>increased visibility when viewed under an imaging beam than said stent prior <br/>to <br/>elution.<br/>24. The stent of claim 17, wherein said stent is configured to elute said <br/>density <br/>enhancing radiologic opacifier material by degradation, such that said stent <br/>has <br/>increased visibility when viewed under an imaging beam than said stent prior <br/>to <br/>elution.<br/>25. The stent of claim 20, wherein said imaging beam comprises CT.<br/>26. The stent according to claim 17, wherein the density enhancing <br/>radiologic<br/>opacifier comprises a lyophilized density enhancing radioiogic opacifier.<br/>27. The stent according to claim 17, wherein the stent has an image density <br/>of less <br/>than about 400 Hounsfield Units.<br/>19<br/>
Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.

<br/>CA 02455439 2011-07-19<br/>Device Viewable Under an Imaging Beam<br/>Field of the invention <br/>[0002] The present invention relates generally to surgery under image <br/>guided<br/>navigation and more particularly relates to a method, device and system for <br/>surgical<br/>implantation of a medical device or the like, and/or postoperative evaluation <br/>of an <br/>implanted medical device or the like under image guidance.<br/>Backaround of the Jnvention <br/>[0003] Stroke and cardiac disease remain a major cause of morbidity and <br/>result<br/>in profound suffering and expense. Increased awareness and improvements in <br/>diagnostic procedures have significantly increased the diagnosis of cervical <br/>and <br/>intracranial and cardiac vascular stenosis. A vascular stenosis is now being <br/>treated <br/>endovascularly at a significantly increased frequency. However, follow-up has<br/>is predominantly been by angiography which evaluates the vascular contour <br/>but not the<br/>vascular wall. It is invasive, time consuming and expensive. Preliminary <br/>studies suggest <br/>that stent evaluation and restenosis pathophysiology can also be evaluated <br/>with Multi-<br/>detector Computed Tomography Angiography ("MDCTA") which would be a <br/>significant <br/>advantage of this technique over conventional angiography,<br/>[0004] More specifically, endovascular therapy has ushered in a new <br/>age of<br/>minimally invasive vascular treatment. Endovascular devices have been rapidly <br/>developed and refined. Present technologies have enabled precise deployment of <br/>stents in much smaller arteries and have become more flexible and compliant 30 <br/>they<br/>can be navigated through tortuosities. At the same time there has been a <br/>growing pool<br/>of physicians trained in modern endovascular therapies so services are more <br/>widely <br/>available. However, the monitoring of these patients has become suboptimal <br/>because it <br/>relies on conventional angiography which is invasive and expensive. It also <br/>requires the <br/>patient to spend a full day removed from their daily activities. It also <br/>requires that some<br/>patients on anticoagulation briefly discontinue their therapy or be admitted <br/>to the<br/>hospital for an extended period of time. New MDCTA technology has not been <br/>widely <br/>used or validated for follow up. However, preliminary case studies seem to <br/>indicate that<br/>1<br/><br/>CA 02455439 2011-07-19<br/>this technology is likely to provide additional beneficial information about <br/>the vascular <br/>wall and stent not obtainable from conventional angiograms. MDCTA is also non-<br/>invasive, requires a minimal amount of time and is less costly. MDCTA now has <br/>an axial <br/>resolution less than 0.5 mm and with the proposed development of new protocols <br/>and<br/>algorithms for image processing, this will be a superior tool to evaluate <br/>stenting and the<br/>etiology of any restenosis or stent failures. In particular, it will likely be <br/>able to separate <br/>negative remodeling from neointimal growth. It will also be able to evaluate <br/>for stent <br/>deformity and wall apposition as well as remodeling. MDCTA should also be <br/>applicable <br/>to other endovascular procedures such as follow up for aneurysm coilings.<br/>[0005] Indeed MDCTA reflects a number of advances in medical imaging <br/>that<br/>allow real time and/or three-dimensional image gathering under Computed <br/>Tomography <br/>(CT"), Magnetic Resonance Imaging ("MRI") or the like. For example, CT <br/>scanners <br/>such as the Toshiba Ac,quillionTm multi detector are capable of generating <br/>images in<br/>three different areas at frame rates of 13 frames a second, to thereby <br/>generate a three-<br/>dimensional rendering of the target area. Indeed, this and other advances in <br/>CT have <br/>led to the development of new CT applications including CT Angiography <br/>("CTA"), and <br/>CT Perfusion ("CTP"). These imaging modalities are rapidly developing into <br/>powerful <br/>tools in the diagnosis and treatment of both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke <br/>and bilary<br/> occlusion. See, for example, the following prior art references:<br/>Kopp AF, Ohnesorge B, Flohr T, Georg C, Schroder S, Kuttner A, Martensen J, <br/>Claussen CD. [Cardiac muitidetector-row CT: first clinical results of<br/>retrospectively ECG-gated spiral with optimized temporal and spatial<br/> resolution]Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr. 2000 May;<br/>172(S):429-35.<br/>2<br/><br/>CA 02455439 2004-01-20<br/>Ohnesorge B, Flohr T, Becker C, Knez A, Kopp AF, Fukuda K, Reiser MF. <br/>[Cardiac imaging with rapid, retrospective ECG synchronized multilevel spiral <br/>CT]Radiologe. 2000 Feb;40(2):111-7<br/>Achenbach S, Moshage W, Ropers D, Nossen J, Bachmann K. Non-invasive<br/> coronary angiography with electron beam tomography: methods and clinical<br/>evaluation in post-PTCA follow-up Z Kardiol. 1997 Feb;86(2):121-30.<br/>Becker CR, Schoepf UJ, Reiser MF.Methods for quantification of coronary <br/>artery calcifications with electron beam and conventional CT and pushing the <br/>spiral CT envelope: new cardiac applications.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2001<br/> Jun;17(3):203-11.<br/>Kopp AF, Schroeder S, Kuettner A, Baumbach A, Georg C, Kuzo R, <br/>Heuschmid M, Ohnesorge B, Karsch KR, Claussen CD. Non-invasive <br/>coronary angiography with high resolution multidetector-row computed <br/>tomography. Results in 102 patients.Eur Heart J. 2002 Nov;23(21):1714-25.<br/> Achenbach S, Ulzheimer S, Baum U, Kachelriess M, Ropers D, Giesler T,<br/>Bautz W, Daniel WG, Kalender WA, Moshage W. Non-invasive coronary <br/>angiography by retrospectively ECG-gated multislice spiral CT.Circulation. <br/>2000 Dec 5;102(23):2823-8.<br/>Knez A, Becker A, Becker C, Leber A, Boekstegers P. Reiser M, Steinbeck G.<br/> [Detection of coronary calcinosis with multislice spiral computerized<br/>tomography: an alternative to electron beam tomographyZ Kardiol. 2002 <br/>Aug;91(8):642-9.<br/>Mahnken All, Sinha AM, Wildberger JE, Krombach GA, Schmitz-Rode T, <br/>Gunther RW. [The influence of motion artifacts conditioned by reconstruction,<br/> on the coronary calcium score in multislice spiral CT]Rofo Fortschr Geb<br/>Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr. 2001 Oct;173(10):888-92.<br/>[0006] However, despite these advances in medical device technology, <br/>and in<br/>particular stent technology and imaging technology, prior art stent <br/>technologies have certain<br/>limitations when viewed under such CT machines, particularly due to beam <br/>hardening<br/>- 3 -<br/><br/>CA 02455439 2004-01-20<br/>artefacts that are typically present, which thereby obscure the image and <br/>obviate or reduce the <br/>effectiveness of the CT machine as a post-operative diagnostic tool<br/>[0007] <br/> Due to these present limitations using MDCTA, it is common to rely on<br/>classical angiography for postoperative evaluation of endovascular procedures, <br/>yet such<br/>angiographic methods are invasive and expensive. In the USA, an angiogram can <br/>cost up to<br/>$8000.00, yet a corresponding MDCTA could be offered for as little as $400.00. <br/>Additionally, endovascular ultrasound has significant associated risks and is <br/>not suitable for <br/>the small intracranial vessels. In the end, it is believed that MDCTA has the <br/>potential to <br/>provide good visualization of the lumen as well as the arterial wall and <br/>stent. MDCTA<br/>actually visualizes the stent better than fluoroscopy and will likely prove to <br/>be the preferred<br/>technique when background subtraction is used to increase vascular <br/>conspicuity. It is also <br/>believed that MDCTA would also enable more precise outcome evaluation and <br/>allow for <br/>investigation of the underlying pathophysiology as well as evaluation of the <br/>stents and <br/>devices used.<br/>[0008] Polymer or lipid based drug delivery systems that can deliver drugs <br/>at a<br/>defined rate for up to five years from a single treatment have revolutionized <br/>medical therapy. <br/>Drug coated coronary stents have been shown to decrease restenosis rates in <br/>large clinical <br/>trials. See for example, the following references:<br/>"Sirilimus eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis of <br/>the<br/> coronary artery", Moses et al. New England Journal of Medicine, page 1315-<br/>1323 October 2, 2003 Vol. 349, No. 14.<br/>"Paclitaxel stent coating inhibits meointimal hyperplasia at 4 weeks in a <br/>porcine model of restenosis", Heldman et al. circulation 2001, 103-2289-95.<br/>"A Paclitaxel eluting stent for the prevention of coronary restenosis", Park <br/>et<br/>al. New England Journal of Medicine 2003, Vol. 348, page 1537-45.<br/>[0009] <br/> With respect to the drug delivery systems there are several types available <br/>at<br/>this time. These are principally those that are biodegradeable or those that <br/>are non <br/>biodegradeable. Biodegradable polymers release their loaded agents as they <br/>break down, <br/>while the matrix of non- biodegradable polymers remain intact even after all <br/>of the<br/>therapeutic agent has been released. These polymers release their loaded <br/>material by a<br/>- 4 -<br/><br/>CA 02455439 2004-01-20<br/>process of either bulk erosion or surface erosion and diffusion or <br/>degradation. The polymers <br/>and co-polymers that are available at the present time include ethylene vinyl <br/>acetate <br/>("EVAc"), a hydrophilic non biodegradable polymer, and biodegradeable polymers <br/>such as <br/>hydrophobic polymers such as poly[BIS(p-carboxyphenoxy)]propane-sebacic acid<br/>("PCPP:SA"), hydrophilic polymers and fatty acid dimer-sebacic acid ("FAD:SA") <br/>polymers<br/>that deliver drugs including hydrophilic drugs and compounds<br/>[0010] A process such as lyophilization can be used to load the <br/>polymer with the<br/>desired compound or drug or compounds or drugs. In this was PCPP:SA, a desired <br/>compound such as iodinated contrast material, and methyl chloride may undergo <br/>the<br/>lyophilization process to load the PCPP:SA with a material with the ability to <br/>attenuate x-ray<br/>radiation and be visible on a radiographic image.<br/>SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION<br/>[0011] In a first aspect of the invention there is provided a medical <br/>device made from<br/>a material operable to perform a therapeutic function of the device and <br/>wherein the material<br/>allows three-dimensional visualization of a surrounding tissue when the <br/>medical device is<br/>inserted into the tissue and viewed under an imaging beam.<br/>[0012] It is therefore an object of the invention to provide a <br/>medical device that is<br/>viewable under certain imaging beams that obviates or mitigates at least one <br/>of the above-<br/>identified disadvantages of the prior art.<br/>[0013] The medical device can be a stent and the surrounding tissue can be <br/>a lumen<br/>of a blood vessel. The stent can have a coating of a radioopaque material <br/>prior to insertion <br/>such that the stent that can be viewed during a conventional angiographic x-<br/>ray DA/DSA <br/>insertion and wherein the coating diminishes after insertion such that the <br/>stent can be viewed <br/>under CT post insertion. The stent can be coated with at least one of an <br/>antibiotic and a<br/>chemotherapy drug. The stent can be coated with at least one drug selected <br/>from the group<br/>consisting of a drug that is therapeutically effective to decrease attachment <br/>of platelets to the <br/>stent and a drug that is therapeutically effective to decrease restenosis. The <br/>drug can be <br/>selected from the group consisting of aspirin, plavix or paclitaxel.<br/>- 5 -<br/><br/>CA 02455439 2004-01-20<br/>[0014] In a particular implementation of the first aspect, the device <br/>can be selected<br/>from the group of devices for the treatment of obstruction due to clot, <br/>plaque, atheroma, <br/>tumours, and treatments involving intimal hyperplasia and recurrent stenosis.<br/>[0015] The material used to manufacture the medical device can be <br/>selected from the<br/>group consisting of plastic, composite carbon fiber and Inconel, nitinol, <br/>stainless steel, or a<br/>radio lucent material.<br/>[0016] The imaging system can be a substantially real-time CT <br/>machine, such as the<br/>Toshiba Acquillon.<br/>[0017] The medical device can have an image density of less than <br/>about 1200<br/>Hounsfield Units. The image density can be less than about 900 Hounsfield <br/>Units. The<br/>image density can be less than about 700 Hounsfield Units. The image density <br/>can be less <br/>than about 400 Hounsfield Units.<br/>[0018] The medical device can be a microcoil and the surrounding <br/>tissue is an<br/>aneurysm repaired with the microcoil.<br/>[0019] The configuration and structure of the medical device can be chosen <br/>to<br/>combine with the properties of the chosen material to provide a reduced beam <br/>hardened <br/>artifact. For example, where the device is a stent and the struts of the stent <br/>can be aligned or <br/>otherwise configured to reduce the beam hardened artifact.<br/>[0020] In another aspect of the invention there is provided an <br/>imaging processing unit<br/> for a CT machine comprising:<br/>a means for receiving mutli-plane images of mammalian tissue; <br/>a database of known medical devices and associated properties of the devices;<br/>a means for determining whether an object detected in the received images <br/>matches with a known medical device in the database, the means for<br/>determining based on the associated properties;<br/>means for applying a filter to the received images to enhance an image of the <br/>tissue that surrounds the implanted medical device based on the known <br/>associated properties; and,<br/>- 6 -<br/><br/>CA 02455439 2004-01-20<br/>means for presenting the image on an output device.<br/>[0021] The database of known medical devices can include at least one <br/>of a stent and<br/>a microcoil. The associated properties in the database can include a <br/>Hounsfield unit <br/>measurement of the device.<br/> Brief Description of the Drawings <br/>[0022] Embodiments of the invention will now be discussed, by way of <br/>example only,<br/>with reference to the attached Figures, in which:<br/>Figure 1 is a representation of an imaging system; <br/>Figure 2 is a side view of a prior art stent;<br/>Figure 3 is a representation of a beam hardened artifact caused by the prior <br/>art<br/>stent of Figure 2 when viewed under the imaging system of Figure 1;<br/>Figure 4 shows the beam hardened artifact of Figure 3 at a different angle; <br/>Figure 5 shows the beam hardened artifact of Figure 4 at a different angle;<br/>Figure 6 a side view of a stent in accordance with an embodiment of the<br/> invention;<br/>Figure 7 is a representation of the stent of Figure 6 when viewed under the <br/>imaging system of Figure 1;<br/>Figure 8 shows a microcoil in accordance with another embodiment of the <br/>invention;<br/> Figure 9 is a partial view of the microcoil of Figure 8;<br/>Figure 10 is a representation of a beam hardened artifact caused by a prior <br/>art <br/>microcoil when viewed under the imaging system of Figure 1;<br/>Figure 11 is a representation of the microcoil of Figure 9 after insertion <br/>into a <br/>patient and when viewed under the imaging system of Figure 1;<br/>- 7 -<br/><br/>CA 02455439 2004-01-20<br/>Figure 12 is a representation of a beam hardened artifact caused by a prior <br/>art <br/>carotid stent when viewed under the imaging system of Figure 1; and,<br/>Figure 13 is a representation of a carotid stent in accordance with another <br/>embodiment of the invention after the carotid stent has been inserted into a<br/> patient and when viewed under the imaging system of Figure 1.<br/>Detailed Description of the Invention <br/>[0023] Referring now to Figure 1, an imaging system is indicated <br/>generally at 30.<br/>Imaging system 30 comprises a patient chamber 34, an image processing unit 38 <br/>and a <br/>display 42. Imaging system 30 can be based on any known or established imaging<br/>technology, but in a present embodiment is based on computed tomography (CT) <br/>having<br/>substantially the same functionality as a machine like the Toshiba Acquillon. <br/>Thus, patient <br/>chamber 34 is operable to capture images of a patient P in at least three <br/>planes, and <br/>processing unit 38 is operable to assemble those captured images to present a <br/>three-<br/>dimensional rendering of a target area within patient P on display 42. Images <br/>on display 42<br/>can be navigated and/or viewed using the mouse and keyboard attached to <br/>processing unit 38,<br/>allowing the user to view a target area within patient P from any number of <br/>views. While not <br/>shown in Figure 1, image processing unit 38 can also be attached to other <br/>output devices in <br/>addition to display 42, such as a printer. Further, image processing unit 38 <br/>also typically <br/>includes a fixed storage device (such as a hard drive), a removable storage <br/>device (such as<br/>CD-Rewriter, or a tape drive) and a network interface card or other network <br/>interface means<br/>for connecting processing unit 38 to a network such as an intranet and/or the <br/>internet over <br/>which captured images can be delivered.<br/>[0024] Referring now to Figure 2, a prior art conventional coronary <br/>stent is indicated<br/>at 50. Figure 2 shows stent 50 in isolation, however, for purposes of <br/>explaining the prior art,<br/>it is to be assumed that stent 50 has been implanted in a coronary artery of <br/>patent P.<br/>[0025] Figure 3 shows an image 54 rendered on display 42 of system 30 <br/>of patient P.<br/>Image 54 shows a beam hardened artefact 52 as it is implanted inside a <br/>coronary artery 58 <br/>inside a heart 62 of patient P. The area identified as beam hardened artefact <br/>52 is an <br/>inaccurate reproduction of stent 50 as it is implanted inside artery 58. The <br/>beam hardening<br/>artefact 52 is created by the material of stent 50. Accordingly, system 30 is <br/>of limited value<br/>- 8 -<br/><br/>CA 02455439 2004-01-20<br/>in performing post-operative evaluations of stent 50 and for determining <br/>whether any <br/>restenosis has occurred of coronary artery 58.<br/>[0026] Figures 4 and 5 show additional images 54a and 54b, <br/>respectively, of different<br/>orientations of heart 62, which are readily produced on display 42 due to the <br/>imaging<br/>capability of system 30. In each image 54a and image 54b, stent 50 and the <br/>surrounding<br/>artery 58 are inaccurately reproduced due to beam hardening artefact 52 of <br/>stent 50. Thus, <br/>notwithstanding the great flexibility of system 30 in being able to provide a <br/>multiplicity of <br/>views of heart 62, in its current form stent 50 and system 30 do not provide <br/>meaningful <br/>images for post-operative evaluation of artery 58 and the progress of any <br/>restenosis that may<br/> be occurring in the lumen of artery 58 surrounding stent 50.<br/>[0027] Figure 6, shows a medical device in accordance with an <br/>embodiment of the<br/>invention as a stent 150. Stent 150 from outward appearances is substantially <br/>the same as <br/>prior art stent 50, and indeed, in the present embodiment is designed to <br/>provide substantially <br/>the same mechanical and therapeutic functionality as prior art stent 50. <br/>However, in contrast<br/>to prior art stent 50, stent 150 is made from a material that has a selected <br/>radiopacity such<br/>that the appearance of stent 150 is preserved when stent 150 is exposed to the <br/>imaging beam <br/>of system 30 and presented on display 42. Thus, when stent 150 is implanted in <br/>heart 62, <br/>then in an image 154 of heart 62 generated by system 30, the appearance of <br/>stent 150 will be <br/>maintained when heart 62 and stent 150 are shown in display 42, as shown in <br/>Figure 7. Since<br/>image 154 has no beam hardened artefacts, it is now possible to examine the <br/>lumen of artery<br/>58 surrounding stent 150, and thereby allow for an examination thereof for <br/>restenosis.<br/>[0028] As will be appreciated by those of skill in the art, presence <br/>or absence of a<br/>beam hardening artefact can be measured according to the properties of the <br/>imaging system <br/>being used and in relation to the Hounsfield units associated with the <br/>particular material or<br/>tissue being exposed to the imaging beam. A relation between the linear <br/>attenuation<br/>coefficient ( ) and the corresponding Hounsfield unit (H) can be expressed as:<br/>H = pMaterial ¨,uW ater <br/>x1000<br/>,uWater<br/>[0029] The value of the Hounsfield unit varies from -1000 (for air) <br/>to 1000 (for bone)<br/>to 3000, as more particularly shown in Table I.<br/>- 9 -<br/><br/>CA 02455439 2011-07-19<br/>Tissue Range of Hounsfield units<br/>Table It<br/>Material Hounsfield Unit <br/>Air -1000 <br/>Lung ___________________________ -500 to -200 <br/>Fat ____________________________ -200 to -50 <br/>Water 0 <br/>Blood 25 <br/>Muscle 25 to 40 <br/>Bone 200 to 1000 <br/>about 1000 can be prone to creating beam hardening artefacts. Thus, presently <br/>preferred <br/>materials from which stem 150 can be manufactured to have reduced beam <br/>hardening <br/>artefacts include certain plastic, composite carbon fiber and Inconel metals <br/>that have similar <br/>mechanical properties to prior art stent 50 such that substantially the same <br/>therapeutic effect<br/>in stent 150 is achieved as was available in prior art stern 50. In any event, <br/>the chosen<br/>material for stout 150 has a level of , Hounsfield density that diminish beam <br/>hardening <br/>artefacts to substantially preserve the appearance of the device under CT or <br/>other <br/>corresponding imaging beam.<br/>[0031] It is thus presently preferred that stent 150 (or other medical <br/>devices according<br/>to the present invention) be made from a material or materials to have an <br/>overall image<br/>density of less than about 1200 Hounsfield Units. Such medical devices can <br/>also have an <br/>overall image density of less than about 900 Hounsfield Units. Such medical <br/>devices can <br/>also have an overall image density of less than about 700 Hounsfield Units. <br/>Such medical <br/>devices can also have an overall image density of less than about 400 <br/>Hounsfield Units.<br/>present invention. The medical devices within the scope of the invention <br/>include devices for <br/>the treatment of obstruction due to clot, plaque, atheroma, tumours or the <br/>like, and/or <br/>treatments involving intimal hyperpla.sia and recurrent stenosis after stent <br/>placenaent. An <br/>appropriate device is delivered into the vascular or bilary system under image <br/>guidance. The<br/>- 10 -<br/><br/>CA 02455439 2011-07-19<br/>post placement follow up of the lumen is enabled by the diminished density and <br/>beam <br/>hardening artefact of the construct and coating of the stent.<br/>[0033] A specific example of another medical device within the scope <br/>of the<br/>invention is shown in Figures 8 and 9, which shows a microcoil 250 for <br/>treatment of an<br/>aneurysm and which is introduced via a guiding cathether 240 and a <br/>microcatheter 245. As <br/>best seen in Figure 8, guiding cathether 240 is inserted through an incision <br/>260 near the <br/>femoral artery or brachial artery or other suitable location and passed <br/>through the venous <br/>system of the patient until it reaches a blood vessel 264 proximal to an <br/>aneurysm 268 in<br/> the patient's head.<br/>[0034] Figure 10 shows an image 254 of the resulting beam hardened artefact <br/>252 when a <br/>prior art microcoil (not shown) is post-operatively examined using imaging <br/>system 30 has <br/>been previously inserted in the patient according to the method described in <br/>reference to <br/>Figure 8. The beam hardened artefact 252 thus renders it difficult, if not <br/>impossible, to<br/>accurately examine the prior art microcoil using imaging system 30.<br/>[0035] However, as seen in image 354 shown in Figure 11, when microcoil 250 is <br/>inserted <br/>according to the method described with reference to Figure 8, then microcoil <br/>250, the now-<br/>repaired aneurysm 268 and blood vessel 264 leading thereto are all visible on <br/>display 42<br/>and therefore capable of post-operative evaluation.<br/>[0036] Another medical device within the scope of the invention is a carotid <br/>stent, for <br/>placement in the carotid artery. Figure 12 shows an image 454 of a sagittal <br/>view of patient <br/>along a plane that includes the carotid artery 470 of the patient. Image 454 <br/>is characterized<br/>by a beam hardened artefact 452 through which the lumen of an implanted prior <br/>art stent<br/>can be Identified, but artefact 452 is severe enough to obscure the lumen of <br/>the carotid <br/>artery 470, therefore preventing a determination as to whether restenosis is <br/>occuring in the <br/>lumen of artery 470 surrounding the prior art stent. However, as shown in <br/>Figure 13, when a <br/>carotoid stent 550 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention <br/>is used, stent<br/>550 and the lumen of artery 470 surrounding the stent 550 can be viewed and <br/>the<br/>occurence of restenonls determined.<br/>[0037] In other embodiments of the invention, the specific structure and/or <br/>configuration <br/>and/or shape of stent 150 (or other medical device) is chosen to further <br/>reduce the device's<br/>overall radiopacity. For example, the weave of the stents structure can be <br/>chosen to reduce<br/>11<br/>=<br/><br/>CA 02455439 2011-07-19<br/>the radiopacity, and therefore the measured level of Hounsfield units <br/>associated with the <br/>stent. Other aspects of the present invention provide a stent having a reduced <br/>number of <br/>passages of the stent or devices across the stenosis before dilating and <br/>deploying the stent <br/>in the stenos's. In certain prior art stents, it is necessary to cross the <br/>wire, pre-dilate, and<br/>deploy the stent posteriorly. As a further example, a stent in accordance with <br/>an<br/>embodiment of the present invention can Include a self-expanding yet balloon <br/>mounted and <br/>intelligently be restrained. For example, the stent can be mounted on a <br/>balloon that is <br/>deployed by inflation of the balloon. Such a stent is self-expanding but is <br/>delivered on a <br/>balloon. The inflation of the balloon breaks the restraining polymeric bands <br/>and results in<br/>the self-expansion of the stent once the initial stimulus has been given, This <br/>polymeric<br/>material is drug-coated and thrombosis resistant. This polymeric material <br/>helps restrain <br/>plaque and potential embolic material behind the stent. The overall <br/>configuration of the stent <br/>has reduced beam hardened artifacts post insertion when viewed under CT.<br/>is p038] The number of passages of hardware across the stent or devices <br/>across the stent is<br/>reduced from five (as found in prior art stents) to two (according to an <br/>embodiment of the <br/>present invention) and thus, restrain against the wall of the vessel deep to <br/>the stent the <br/>material that would otherwise become potentially an embolic source. This can <br/>be helpful in <br/>reducing the risks of stroke after carotid stenting and in some circumstances <br/>can help<br/>reduce the need for distal flow protection devices which themselves have <br/>stroke risk.<br/>[0039] In another variation of the present invention, stent 150 is coated <br/>(either in its entirety<br/>or in particular locations) with an opacifier to temporarily increase the <br/>Hounsfield units <br/>associated with stent 150 during its insertion, to allow stent 150 to be <br/>inserted using<br/>traditional means. Such a coating would be configured to gradually abate and <br/>dissolve into<br/>the patient's blood stream, such that the radiopacity and associated <br/>Hounsfield units of <br/>stent 150 would decrease over time, such that under a post-operative CT <br/>evaluation, the <br/>Hounsfield units associated with stent 150 are low enough to allow proper <br/>visualization of <br/>the 30 lumen of artery 58 surrounding stent 150. Suitable materials for <br/>coating stent 150<br/>include gold, iodine, ionic and non ionic iodinated compounds, ethiodol, and <br/>lipiodol,<br/>barium, tungsten, tantalum, gadolinium. Whatever coating is chosen, the amount <br/>and rate of<br/>12<br/><br/>CA 02455439 2004-01-20<br/>dissolving of the coating is chosen to reduce toxicity experience by the <br/>patient during <br/>dissolution.<br/>[0040] In a presently preferred embodiment, the aforementioned <br/>coating is a<br/>hydrophilic polymer containing a restenosis inhibiting drug and a density <br/>enhancing<br/>radiologic material such as lyophilizied iodinated contrast material, which is <br/>embedded into<br/>the polymer. This coating is then placed over a stent 150 that is made from a <br/>suitable <br/>material such as a plastic or metal, such as stainless steel, inconel or metal <br/>glass (materials <br/>already approved by The United States of America Food and Drug <br/>Administration), or an <br/>optimal arrangement of strands of another metal can be used. The result is <br/>that stent 150 is<br/>both drug eluting and density eluting (i.e. the level of Hounsfield units <br/>associated with the<br/>stent decreases over time.)<br/>[0041] In another embodiment of the invention, certain post <br/>processing software is<br/>provided in image processing unit 38 to maximize vascular conspicuity in <br/>conjunction with <br/>the known Hounsfield units and other imaging properties associated with stent <br/>150 or other<br/>medical device in accordance with the present invention. For example, where a <br/>level of<br/>Hounsfield units associated with stent 150 is known, then upon detection by <br/>system 30 of an <br/>item within the patient at that particular level of Hounsfield units, then <br/>that information can <br/>be used to identify the item as stent 150 and then to further enhance the <br/>image of the <br/>surrounding vascular region based on the known imaging properties (ie. <br/>radiopacity,<br/> structure, etc.) and using known signal processing an filtering techniques.<br/>[0042] While only specific combinations of the various features and <br/>components of<br/>the present invention have been discussed herein, it will be apparent to those <br/>skilled in the art <br/>that desired subsets of the disclosed features and components and/or <br/>alternative combinations <br/>of these features and components can be utilized, as desired. For example, the <br/>stents, coils<br/>and other medical devices according to the present invention can be coated <br/>with a material to<br/>decrease the risk of infection and restenosis, using techniques and compounds <br/>described in <br/>EP0797988A2 and EP1155689A2 to Angiotech Pharmaceuticals Inc. of Canada, and <br/>the <br/>University of British Columbia.<br/>[0043] The present invention also provides certain novel methods for <br/>evaluating<br/>cervical and intracranial vascular stents using CT, including MDCTA, that is <br/>reliable and low<br/>cost and then to use these techniques for long term evaluation and outcome <br/>analysis of<br/>- 13 -<br/><br/>CA 02455439 2004-01-20<br/>stenting. Sensitivity and specificity can then be determined for MDCTA by <br/>comparison to <br/>conventional catheter angiogram results. The radiographic density of the <br/>stent, coil or other <br/>device can be altered to enhance CT, X Ray, Ultrasound and MRI visibility of <br/>the lumen. <br/>For the purpose of enhanced accuracy of CT diagnostic imaging beam hardening <br/>artefacts<br/>will be reduced and/or minimized. The devices in the present invention are in <br/>contrast to prior<br/>art devices that have been developed for conventional fluoroscopy guidance and <br/>thus are of a <br/>radiodensity or radiopacity that exceeds the needs of CT for clear <br/>visualization, this excess <br/>density creates unwanted beam hardening artefact.<br/>[0044] Furthermore, the present invention allows for a relatively non-<br/>invasive means<br/>to visualize the lumen of a blood vessel surrounding a previously installed <br/>stent (or other site<br/>of an implanted medical device). Due to the reduced beam hardening artefacts <br/>of the stent, <br/>obscuration of the lumen is reduced. This results in the ability to visualize <br/>the lumen non-<br/>invasively as compared follow-ups conducted by invasive repeat catheter <br/>angiography, with <br/>its resultant risk of stroke, death and/or injury to an important vessel or to <br/>otherwise obscure<br/>a critical finding. CTA and CTP are relatively less invasive imaging <br/>modalities that have<br/>been shown to aid in the diagnosis and treatment of acute ischemic stroke. <br/>Both utilize high-<br/>speed spiral CT scanning and three-dimensional volumetric reconstruction <br/>software to create <br/>various types of images following injection of IV contrast solution. CTA can <br/>provide three-<br/>dimensional vascular delineation similar to other non-invasive techniques as <br/>well as<br/>visualization of adjacent non-vascular soft-tissue. CTA can also offer rapid <br/>volume<br/>acquisition, limited reconstruction artifact and scan completion during the <br/>period of peak <br/>intravascular contrast enhancement. Using CTA, it is often possible to see <br/>filling defect in a <br/>vessel as a result of contrast displacement by clot or thrombus. The <br/>sensitivity for detecting <br/>flow abnormality in vessels in the circle of Willis by CTA can be at least 89% <br/>when<br/>compared to digital subtraction angiography ("DSA"), and CTA does not carry <br/>the up to 5%<br/>risk of complication, and the up to 0.5% risk of permanent stroke that DSA has <br/>been shown <br/>to carry.<br/>[0045] The above-described embodiments of the invention are intended <br/>to be<br/>examples of the present invention and alterations and modifications may be <br/>effected thereto,<br/>by those of skill in the art, without departing from the scope of the <br/>invention which is defined<br/>solely by the claims appended hereto.<br/>- 14 -<br/>
Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the siteDisclaimer , as well as the definitions forPatent ,Event History ,Maintenance Fee  andPayment History  should be consulted.

Event History

DescriptionDate
Inactive: Expired (new Act pat)2024-01-22
Common Representative Appointed2019-10-30
Common Representative Appointed2019-10-30
Change of Address or Method of Correspondence Request Received2018-05-31
Grant by Issuance2014-02-11
Inactive: Cover page published2014-02-10
Pre-grant2013-11-28
Inactive: Final fee received2013-11-28
Allowance Requirements Determined Compliant2013-07-12
Letter Sent2013-07-12
Allowance Requirements Determined Compliant2013-07-12
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA)2013-07-04
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment2013-03-07
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment2013-02-04
Inactive: IPC deactivated2013-01-19
Inactive: IPC assigned2013-01-04
Inactive: IPC expired2013-01-01
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition2012-09-07
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment2012-05-15
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment2012-04-20
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition2011-11-15
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment2011-10-04
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment2011-07-19
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment2011-06-27
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment2011-03-15
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition2011-03-09
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment2010-08-18
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment2009-10-22
Letter Sent2009-02-20
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant2009-01-15
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant2009-01-15
Request for Examination Received2009-01-15
Inactive: Office letter2007-02-14
Appointment of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant2007-02-12
Inactive: Office letter2007-02-12
Inactive: Office letter2007-02-12
Revocation of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant2007-02-12
Letter Sent2006-11-23
Appointment of Agent Request2006-10-26
Revocation of Agent Request2006-10-26
Inactive: Single transfer2006-10-26
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection)2004-09-24
Inactive: Cover page published2004-09-23
Inactive: IPC assigned2004-03-15
Inactive: IPC assigned2004-03-15
Inactive: IPC assigned2004-03-15
Inactive: IPC assigned2004-03-15
Inactive: IPC assigned2004-03-15
Inactive: IPC assigned2004-03-15
Inactive: First IPC assigned2004-03-15
Inactive: Filing certificate - No RFE (English)2004-02-27
Filing Requirements Determined Compliant2004-02-27
Application Received - Regular National2004-02-27

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2023-01-09

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPOPatent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee TypeAnniversary YearDue DatePaid Date
Application fee - standard2004-01-20
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard022006-01-202005-10-06
Registration of a document2006-10-262006-10-26
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard032007-01-222007-01-11
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - standard042008-01-212007-12-06
Request for examination - standard2009-01-15
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - standard052009-01-202009-01-19
MF (application, 6th anniv.) - standard062010-01-202010-01-07
MF (application, 7th anniv.) - standard072011-01-202010-11-30
MF (application, 8th anniv.) - standard082012-01-202011-12-19
MF (application, 9th anniv.) - standard092013-01-212013-01-12
MF (application, 10th anniv.) - standard102014-01-202013-11-28
Final fee - standard2013-11-28
MF (patent, 11th anniv.) - standard112015-01-202015-01-12
MF (patent, 12th anniv.) - standard122016-01-202015-09-21
MF (patent, 13th anniv.) - standard132017-01-202016-10-21
MF (patent, 14th anniv.) - standard142018-01-222017-10-24
MF (patent, 15th anniv.) - standard152019-01-212018-12-31
MF (patent, 16th anniv.) - standard162020-01-202020-01-20
MF (patent, 17th anniv.) - standard172021-01-202021-01-08
MF (patent, 18th anniv.) - standard182022-01-202021-09-20
MF (patent, 19th anniv.) - standard192023-01-202023-01-09
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
KIERAN MURPHY LLC
Past Owners on Record
KIERAN P. MURPHY
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have difficulties with downloading multiple files, please try splitting the download into smaller groups of files and try downloading again.

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail atCIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages  Size of Image (KB) 
Description2004-01-2014 734
Abstract2004-01-201 9
Claims2004-01-202 59
Drawings2004-01-208 217
Representative drawing2004-05-121 21
Cover Page2004-08-311 46
Description2011-07-1914 739
Claims2011-07-196 145
Drawings2011-07-198 212
Claims2012-05-155 137
Claims2013-03-075 139
Representative drawing2014-01-131 28
Cover Page2014-01-131 55
Filing Certificate (English)2004-02-271 160
Reminder of maintenance fee due2005-09-211 110
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s))2006-11-231 105
Reminder - Request for Examination2008-09-231 117
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination2009-02-201 175
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable2013-07-121 162
Fees2013-01-121 155
Fees2005-10-061 29
Correspondence2006-10-262 76
Correspondence2007-02-121 14
Correspondence2007-02-121 19
Correspondence2007-02-141 14
Fees2007-01-112 56
Fees2007-12-061 52
Prosecution-Amendment2009-01-152 65
Fees2009-01-192 61
Fees2010-01-071 200
Prosecution-Amendment2010-08-181 29
Fees2010-11-301 200
Prosecution-Amendment2011-03-095 214
Prosecution-Amendment2011-03-153 76
Prosecution-Amendment2011-06-272 36
Prosecution-Amendment2011-07-1944 1,792
Prosecution-Amendment2011-10-041 26
Prosecution-Amendment2011-11-152 62
Prosecution-Amendment2012-04-203 81
Prosecution-Amendment2012-05-1517 515
Prosecution-Amendment2012-09-072 55
Prosecution-Amendment2013-02-041 28
Prosecution-Amendment2013-03-075 155
Fees2013-11-281 23
Correspondence2013-11-282 76
Fees2015-01-121 24
Prosecution correspondence2009-10-222 35
Maintenance fee payment2020-01-201 25

Your request is in progress.

Requested information will be available
in a moment.

Thank you for waiting.

Request in progress image
Report a problem or mistake on this page
Version number:
3.4.39

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp