Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to contents

metaSNF: Meta clustering with Similarity Network Fusion

Brief Overview

metaSNF is an R package that facilitates usage of the meta clustering paradigm described in (Caruana et al. 2006) with the similarity network fusion (SNF) data integration procedure developed in (Wang et al. 2014). The package offers a comprehensive suite of tools to assist users in transforming multi-modal tabular data into cluster solutions, decision making in the clustering process, and visualization along the way with a strong emphasis on context-specific utility and principled validation of results.

Installation

You will need R version 4.1.0 or higher to install this package. metaSNF can be installed from CRAN:

install.packages("metasnf")

Development versions can be installed from GitHub:

# Latest development versiondevtools::install_github("BRANCHlab/metasnf")# Install a specific tagged versiondevtools::install_github("BRANCHlab/metasnf@v2.1.3")

Quick Start

Minimal usage of the package looks like this:

# Load the packagelibrary(metasnf)# Setting up the datadl<-data_list(list(abcd_cort_t,"cortical_thickness","neuroimaging","continuous"),list(abcd_cort_sa,"cortical_surface_area","neuroimaging","continuous"),list(abcd_subc_v,"subcortical_volume","neuroimaging","continuous"),list(abcd_income,"household_income","demographics","continuous"),list(abcd_pubertal,"pubertal_status","demographics","continuous"),    uid="patient")#> ℹ 176 observations dropped due to incomplete data.# Specifying 5 different sets of settings for SNFset.seed(42)sc<-snf_config(dl,    n_solutions=5,    max_k=40)#> ℹ No distance functions specified. Using defaults.#> ℹ No clustering functions specified. Using defaults.# This matrix has clustering solutions for each of the 5 SNF runs!sol_df<-batch_snf(dl,sc)sol_df#> 5 cluster solutions of 100 observations:#> solution nclust mc uid_NDAR_INV0567T2Y9 uid_NDAR_INV0IZ157F8#>        1      2  .                    1                    2#>        2      2  .                    2                    1#>        3     10  .                    1                    9#>        4      2  .                    2                    1#>        5      8  .                    1                    7#> 98 observations not shown.#> Use `print(n = ...)` to change the number of rows printed.#> Use `t()` to view compact cluster solution format.t(sol_df)#> 5 cluster solutions of 100 observations:#>                  uid      s1    s2    s3    s4    s5#> uid_NDAR_INV0567T2Y9       1     2     1     2     1#> uid_NDAR_INV0IZ157F8       2     1     9     1     7#> uid_NDAR_INV0J4PYA5F       1     2     7     2     3#> uid_NDAR_INV10OMKVLE       2     1     8     1     4#> uid_NDAR_INV15FPCW4O       1     2     2     2     5#> uid_NDAR_INV19NB4RJK       1     2     9     2     7#> uid_NDAR_INV1HLGR738       1     2     9     2     7#> uid_NDAR_INV1KR0EZFU       2     1     9     2     7#> uid_NDAR_INV1L3Y9EOP       1     2     2     2     5#> uid_NDAR_INV1TCP5GNM       1     2     8     2     4#> 90 observations not shown.

Check out the tutorial vignettes below to learn about how the package can be used:

And more tutorials can be found under the “articles” section of the documentation home page:https://branchlab.github.io/metasnf/index.html

Background

Why use meta clustering?

Clustering algorithms seek solutions where members of the same cluster are very similar to each other and members of distinct clusters are very dissimilar to each other. In sufficiently noisy datasets where many qualitatively distinct solutions with similar scores of clustering quality exist, it is not necessarily the case that the top solution selected by a clustering algorithm will also be the most useful one for the user’s context.

To address this issue, the original meta clustering procedureCaruana et al., 2006 involved generating a large number of reasonable clustering solutions, clustering those solutions into qualitatively similar ones, and having the user examine those “meta clusters” to find something that seems like it’ll be the most useful.

Why use SNF?

In the clinical data setting, we often have access to patient data across a wide range of domains, such as imaging, genetics, biomarkers, demographics. When trying to extract subtypes out of all this information, direct concatenation of the data followed by cluster analysis can result in a substantial amount of lost (valuable) signal contained in each individual domain. Empirically, SNF has been demonstrated to effectively integrate highly diverse patient data for the purposes of clinical subtyping.

Documentation

Example workflows

Essential objects

Further customization of generated solutions

References

Caruana, Rich, Mohamed Elhawary, Nam Nguyen, and Casey Smith. 2006. “Meta Clustering.” InSixth International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM’06), 107–18.https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2006.103.
Wang, Bo, Aziz M. Mezlini, Feyyaz Demir, Marc Fiume, Zhuowen Tu, Michael Brudno, Benjamin Haibe-Kains, and Anna Goldenberg. 2014. “Similarity Network Fusion for Aggregating Data Types on a Genomic Scale.”Nature Methods 11 (3): 333–37.https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2810.

Links

License

Citation

Developers

  • Prashanth S Velayudhan
    Author, maintainer
  • Xiaoqiao Xu
    Author
  • Prajkta Kallurkar
    Author
  • Ana Patricia Balbon
    Author
  • Maria T Secara
    Author
  • Adam Taback
    Author
  • Denise Sabac
    Author
  • Nicholas Chan
    Author
  • Shihao Ma
    Author
  • Bo Wang
    Author
  • Daniel Felsky
    Author
  • Stephanie H Ameis
    Author
  • Brian Cox
    Author
  • Colin Hawco
    Author
  • Lauren Erdman
    Author
  • Anne L Wheeler
    Author, thesis advisor

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp