Movatterモバイル変換

Numbers 20:20
And he said, Thou shalt not go through. And Edom came out against him with much people, and with a strong hand.

Numbers 21:23
And Sihon would not suffer Israel to pass through his border: but Sihon gathered all his people together, and went out against Israel into the wilderness: and he came to Jahaz, and fought against Israel.

2 Chronicles 13:13
But Jeroboam caused an ambushment to come about behind them: so they were before Judah, and the ambushmentwas behind them.

they came together at Gibeah
Gibeah was a significant city within the territory of Benjamin, known for its elevated position and strategic importance. It was the hometown of King Saul, Israel's first king, and had a reputation for being a stronghold. The gathering at Gibeah underscores its role as a central place for the tribe of Benjamin, both politically and militarily. Archaeological evidence suggests that Gibeah was a fortified city, which would have made it a logical rallying point for the Benjamites.

to go out and fight against the Israelites
This phrase highlights the internal conflict within the nation of Israel, as the tribe of Benjamin prepared to fight against the other tribes. The civil war was sparked by the heinous crime committed in Gibeah, as described in the preceding chapters. The Benjamites' decision to fight rather than surrender the guilty men reflects the deep-seated issues of justice, loyalty, and pride. This conflict foreshadows the later divisions within Israel, such as the split between the northern and southern kingdoms. The Benjamites' resistance can be seen as a type of the broader human rebellion against divine justice, contrasting with the ultimate reconciliation offered through Jesus Christ.

“From their cities the Benjamites came together…” (Judges 20:14)

• Every settlement of Benjamin responds, showing full tribal solidarity. Unlike earlier periods when tribes hesitated to answer calls for help (Judges 5:15-17), here none stay behind.

• Their unity reveals the power of shared identity—yet it is marshalled for the wrong purpose. CompareGenesis 11:4 where people unify around rebellion, and contrast with God-honoring unity inPsalm 133:1 andActs 2:42-44.

• The phrase underscores accountability: the decision is collective, so the coming judgment will be collective (Judges 20:46-48).

“…came together to Gibeah…”

• Gibeah is both the crime scene (Judges 19:22-30) and the rallying point. By choosing that specific town, Benjamin openly identifies with its sin rather than distancing itself (Deuteronomy 13:12-18).

• Gathering at Gibeah signals defiance against the nationwide assembly at Mizpah (Judges 20:1). Two centers form: one aligned with covenant faithfulness, the other with stubborn loyalty to kin.

• This physical convergence at Gibeah foreshadows later moments when Israel gathers at places of sin for battle—such as the showdown on Mount Carmel (1 Kings 18:19-40).

“…to go out…”

• The phrase pictures offensive movement, not mere defense. Benjamin is proactive, stepping beyond city walls to confront their brethren.

• It echoes earlier language of Israel “going out” to conquer Canaan (Numbers 32:20-22), but here the direction is tragically reversed—covenant people aim aggression at covenant people.

• Going out against fellow Israelites highlights how sin distorts calling; energies meant for driving out wickedness now protect it (Isaiah 5:20).

“…and fight against the Israelites.”

• The adversaries are not pagans but brothers. Civil war within God’s family illustrates the devastation when justice is refused (James 4:1-2).

• Benjamin chooses blood ties over moral truth. This mirrorsMatthew 10:37 where Jesus warns that allegiance to family over righteousness misplaces loyalty.

• Their stance forces Israel into painful but necessary discipline (Deuteronomy 19:19). When sin is sheltered, confrontation becomes an act of covenant fidelity (Galatians 6:1).

Judges 20:14 records Benjamin’s united, deliberate march from every city to Gibeah, determined to launch an offensive battle against the rest of Israel. Their collective decision to defend blatant sin rather than repent exposes how communal loyalty can be misused, turning brother against brother and inviting severe judgment. The verse warns that unity devoid of righteousness leads to tragic conflict, while calling God’s people to prioritize covenant truth over tribal allegiance.