Movatterモバイル変換

Judges 17:10
And Micah said unto him, Dwell with me, and be unto me a father and a priest, and I will give thee tenshekels of silver by the year, and a suit of apparel, and thy victuals. So the Levite went in.

Proverbs 30:15
The horseleach hath two daughters,crying, Give, give. There are threethings that are never satisfied,yea, fourthings say not,It is enough:

Isaiah 56:11
Yea,they are greedy dogswhich can never have enough, and theyare shepherdsthat cannot understand: they all look to their own way, every one for his gain, from his quarter.

went.

and took the ephod,
The ephod, a priestly garment, was often associated with seeking divine guidance. However, in this context, it is misused, symbolizing the corruption of true worship. The ephod's presence here may remind readers of the misuse of religious symbols for personal or idolatrous purposes, as seen in the story of Gideon (Judges 8:27).

the household idols,
Household idols, or teraphim, were common in ancient Near Eastern cultures and often used for divination or as protective talismans. Their inclusion here underscores the syncretism and idolatry prevalent in Israel during the time of the Judges, contrary to the commandment against idolatry (Exodus 20:3-4).

and the graven image,
The graven image represents a direct violation of the second commandment. This reflects the spiritual decline in Israel, where even those in religious roles, like the priest, participate in idolatry. The presence of such images indicates a departure from the worship of Yahweh alone, a recurring issue throughout the Old Testament.

and went with the people.
The priest's decision to go with the Danites signifies a shift in allegiance, prioritizing personal benefit over spiritual integrity. This action foreshadows the establishment of a rival religious center in Dan, which becomes a stumbling block for Israel (1 Kings 12:29-30). It serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of forsaking God's ordained order for convenience or gain.

The Levite’s immediate delight (Judges 18:19–20) exposes a heart motivated by self-interest rather than loyalty to the LORD.

• His joy springs from the promise of greater status—serving a tribe instead of one household—echoing the attitude of a “hireling” who serves for gain (John 10:12–13).

• Scripture portrays true servants as seeking God’s honor first (1 Samuel 12:3–5;1 Peter 5:2–3). The priest’s eagerness warns against confusing personal advancement with divine calling.

• The narrative shows Israel already “without a king” (Judges 17:6), and this priest behaves as one who also lacks the true King (Malachi 1:6).

An ephod was originally a sacred garment for the high priest (Exodus 28:4), symbolizing mediation before God.

• Micah had fashioned a counterfeit ephod (Judges 17:5), turning holy apparel into an idol-accessory.

• By seizing it, the Levite treats the holy as common (Leviticus 10:10), illustrating how form can survive after substance is gone (2 Timothy 3:5).

• The ephod’s removal robs Micah’s house of its supposed “priestly” legitimacy, showing how false religion is portable and expendable.

These small “teraphim” (Genesis 31:19;Hosea 3:4) were thought to guarantee blessing, yet God calls them worthless (Zechariah 10:2).

• Their presence in an Israelite home marks blatant disobedience to the second commandment (Exodus 20:4).

• Collecting them reveals syncretism—mixing Yahweh-worship with pagan superstition—something repeatedly condemned (1 Samuel 15:23;2 Kings 17:41).

• The Levite’s willingness to traffic in these objects shows how idolatry enslaves both leader and follower (Romans 1:23–25).

This carved statue was the centerpiece of Micah’s shrine (Judges 17:3–4).

• God’s law expressly forbids carved images for worship (Deuteronomy 27:15), yet the priest treats it as spiritual capital.

• Carrying a single idol to a new location demonstrates how idolatry must be transported and protected—unlike the living God who carries His people (Isaiah 46:1–4).

• The event underscores that counterfeit worship can appear successful for a season, even gaining a bigger audience (Acts 8:9–11), while still provoking divine judgment.

Finally, the Levite abandons Micah to accompany the Danites on their unauthorized migration (Judges 18:27).

• He follows the crowd rather than God, echoing Israel’s future rejection of Samuel’s warnings (1 Samuel 8:19–20).

• The Danites promise him “father and priest” status (Judges 18:19), yet the real priesthood was tied to Shiloh’s tabernacle, not personal ambition (Joshua 18:1).

• 2 Chron 15:3 laments seasons “without a teaching priest,” and this moment illustrates the vacuum left when leaders forsake truth for opportunity.

Judges 18:20 captures a tragic snapshot of spiritual compromise: a Levite overjoyed at promotion, carrying an ephod meant for holy service, clutching household gods, and escorting a carved image to a new stage. Each phrase unveils progressive abandonment of God’s covenant—leadership driven by gain, sacred symbols emptied of meaning, idols clung to for security, and a people guided by expedience rather than obedience. The verse warns that when God’s Word is sidelined, even religious professionals can become brokers of idolatry, yet it also highlights the enduring contrast between man-made religion and the steadfast holiness of the LORD.

In the midst of the people.--That they might guard his person. It is not necessarily implied that he carriedallthese sacred objects himself; hemayhave done so, for the molten image, which was perhaps the heaviest object, is not here mentioned.