Movatterモバイル変換

Job 29:7-17
When I went out to the gate through the city,when I prepared my seat in the street! …

Job 31:34
Did I fear a great multitude, or did the contempt of families terrify me, that I kept silence,and went not out of the door?

1 Kings 21:11-15
And the men of his city,even the elders and the nobles who were the inhabitants in his city, did as Jezebel had sent unto them,and as itwas written in the letters which she had sent unto them…

mighty man.

Job 13:8
Will ye accept his person? will ye contend for God?

and a man of honor lived on it
This phrase indicates that the land was not only owned by a powerful person but also inhabited by someone of integrity and respect. In biblical culture, honor was a crucial social value, often associated with righteousness and adherence to God's laws. The presence of a "man of honor" suggests a community or society where moral and ethical standards were upheld. This can be connected to the biblical principle that those who live righteously will dwell securely in the land (Proverbs 2:21). The "man of honor" can also be seen as a foreshadowing of Christ, who lived a life of perfect honor and righteousness (Hebrews 4:15).

• Eliphaz pictures a setting where property is firmly in the grip of one owner. “Belonged” shows exclusive control, not shared stewardship (cf.1 Kings 21:1–3 where Naboth’s vineyard is coveted).

• By placing this clause after v. 7 (“You gave no water to the weary and withheld food from the famished,”), Eliphaz argues that Job’s supposed selfishness is tied to land possession itself—resources are withheld because land is locked up.

• Scripture consistently warns against treating land as a mere commodity;Leviticus 25:23 reminds that “the land is Mine,” andDeuteronomy 19:14 condemns shifting boundary stones. Eliphaz leverages that standard to indict Job.

• Though Eliphaz’s accusation is mistaken (Job 1:1, 8), his words still reflect a real biblical principle: hoarding territory often precedes mistreating neighbors (Isaiah 5:8).

• “Mighty” underscores social power—someone able to enforce his will (Psalm 52:7 speaks of a “mighty man” who trusts in wealth).

• Eliphaz implies that Job’s influence let him corner the land market, echoingMicah 2:1–2: “They covet fields and seize them.”

• The prophets repeatedly connect might with responsibility.Proverbs 3:27 commands, “Do not withhold good from those who deserve it,” a duty magnified for the strong.

• Literal strength or military clout is not the only issue; economic leverage counts (James 2:6: “Is it not the rich who oppress you?”). Eliphaz suggests Job abused that leverage.

• The second character seems respectable—“a man of honor.” Yet Eliphaz claims this dignitary simply takes up residence on land captured by power, distancing himself from the needy outside the gate (Luke 16:19–21’s rich man and Lazarus provide a parallel).

• In context, Eliphaz means Job himself: wealthy, honored, yet blind to suffering. He presses the irony that one reputed for virtue dwells on land obtained through injustice.

• Scripture insists true honor includes generosity (Proverbs 14:31, “Whoever oppresses the poor shows contempt for their Maker, but whoever is kind to the needy honors Him,”).

• The image warns that social respectability can mask sin, mirroring2 Samuel 12:1–4 where a rich man’s outward standing hides theft from the poor.

Job 22:8 depicts, according to Eliphaz, a scenario where land is locked away by a powerful, respected figure who fails the poor. Eliphaz misapplies it to righteous Job, yet Scripture records the accusation to spotlight a timeless truth: strength and honor bring sober responsibility before God to protect, not exploit, the vulnerable.