Movatterモバイル変換

Genesis 37:22
And Reuben said unto them, Shed no blood,but cast him into this pit thatis in the wilderness, and lay no hand upon him; that he might rid him out of their hands, to deliver him to his father again.

Exodus 21:16,21
And he that stealeth a man, and selleth him, or if he be found in his hand, he shall surely be put to death…

Nehemiah 5:8
And I said unto them, We after our ability have redeemed our brethren the Jews, which were sold unto the heathen; and will ye even sell your brethren? or shall they be sold unto us? Then held they their peace, and found nothingto answer.

let not.

1 Samuel 18:17
And Saul said to David, Behold my elder daughter Merab, her will I give thee to wife: only be thou valiant for me, and fight the LORD'S battles. For Saul said, Let not mine hand be upon him, but let the hand of the Philistines be upon him.

2 Samuel 11:14-17
And it came to pass in the morning, that David wrote a letter to Joab, and sentit by the hand of Uriah…

2 Samuel 12:9
Wherefore hast thou despised the commandment of the LORD, to do evil in his sight? thou hast killed Uriah the Hittite with the sword, and hast taken his wifeto be thy wife, and hast slain him with the sword of the children of Ammon.

he is our.

Genesis 29:14
And Laban said to him, Surely thouart my bone and my flesh. And he abode with him the space of a month.

Genesis 42:21
And they said one to another, Weare verily guilty concerning our brother, in that we saw the anguish of his soul, when he besought us, and we would not hear; therefore is this distress come upon us.

were content.

and not lay a hand on him;
The brothers' decision not to harm Joseph physically is a moment of restraint, possibly influenced by Reuben's earlier plea to spare his life (Genesis 37:21-22). This reflects a tension between their jealousy and a lingering sense of familial duty. The phrase also echoes the biblical principle of God's sovereignty and protection over His chosen ones, as seen in the lives of other patriarchs.

for he is our brother, our own flesh.”
This acknowledgment of Joseph as their brother and flesh highlights the familial bond that should have protected him. It underscores the moral and ethical failure of the brothers, who allow envy to override their natural affection. This phrase also points to the broader biblical theme of the sanctity of family and the consequences of fraternal betrayal, as seen in the story of Cain and Abel (Genesis 4).

And they agreed.
The brothers' agreement signifies a collective decision, showing their unity in wrongdoing. This consensus among the brothers illustrates the power of group dynamics in leading individuals to commit acts they might not do alone. It also sets the stage for the unfolding of God's providential plan, as Joseph's journey to Egypt becomes a crucial part of Israel's history and God's redemptive narrative.

- The invitation is immediate and persuasive: “Come.”

- It pulls the brothers together around a sinful plan, illustrating how quickly evil ideas can spread in a group (Proverbs 1:10–15).

- Reuben’s earlier attempt to rescue Joseph (Genesis 37:21–22) is bypassed; the majority’s voice prevails.

- The momentum of the moment reminds us how important it is to resist peer pressure and choose righteousness even when out-numbered (Exodus 23:2).

- Greed mixes with jealousy. Instead of killing Joseph, they see profit in him—“twenty shekels of silver” (Genesis 37:28).

- The Ishmaelites are distant relatives, descendants of Abraham through Hagar (Genesis 25:12–18). The brothers are literally handing Joseph to kin who had historically lived outside the covenant line—highlighting the brokenness of family relationships when sin reigns.

- Selling Joseph fulfils God’s larger plan to place him in Egypt (Genesis 45:4–8), showing that the Lord can orchestrate redemption even through wrongful human choices (Romans 8:28).

- The brothers soothe their consciences. They will not shed blood, but they will still commit violence through human trafficking.

- Sin often disguises itself as a “lesser evil,” yet it remains evil (James 2:10).

- This clause echoes God’s value on life (Genesis 9:6;Exodus 20:13) while exposing the brothers’ hypocrisy: they spare his life yet destroy his freedom.

- They invoke family loyalty, yet their actions betray it. Words without true love are empty (1 John 3:18).

- Scripture repeatedly commands care for “your brother” (Leviticus 19:17–18;Galatians 6:10). The brothers know the right principle but choose convenience over commitment.

- Their acknowledgment of kinship heightens the offense—hurting those closest to us grieves God deeply (Genesis 4:9-10).

- Sin becomes corporate. Each brother is now complicit (Psalm 83:5).

- Group consensus does not equal righteousness (Acts 5:3–9).

- Yet even this agreement fits God’s sovereign design: “You intended to harm me, but God intended it for good” (Genesis 50:20). The Lord’s purposes stand, turning betrayal into eventual deliverance for many (Acts 2:23).

Genesis 37:27 reveals a moment when envy, greed, and compromise converge. The brothers choose profit over murder yet still commit grave sin by selling Joseph. Their rationalizations—“we won’t kill him” and “he is our brother”—cannot mask their betrayal. While they act freely and wickedly, God sovereignly uses their choice to move Joseph toward Egypt, setting in motion the salvation of their family during famine. The verse warns us about the deceptive softness of sin, the danger of groupthink, and the faithfulness of God who works even through human failure to accomplish His redemptive plan.

Parallel Commentaries ...