Movatterモバイル変換

shall take the man
The involvement of the elders in taking the man indicates a formal legal process. This reflects the structured judicial system in place, where accusations and disputes were handled with due process. The man in question is likely the husband who has falsely accused his wife, as the context of the surrounding verses suggests. This action underscores the importance of accountability and truthfulness in marital relationships.

and punish him.
The punishment here serves as a deterrent against false accusations and upholds the integrity of marriage. In the broader biblical context, false witness is condemned (Exodus 20:16), and justice is a central theme throughout Scripture (Micah 6:8). The punishment would likely involve a fine and public reprimand, emphasizing the seriousness of the offense. This reflects God's desire for truth and justice, which are fulfilled in Christ, who embodies truth (John 14:6) and will ultimately judge with righteousness (Acts 17:31).

• The word “then” points back to verses 13-17, where a husband falsely accuses his new bride of immorality.

• Once the accusation is proven false, the law does not linger—justice moves immediately.Deuteronomy 17:6-7 shows the same principle: “On the testimony of two or three witnesses a man shall be put to death… You must purge the evil from among you.” Action follows proof, not personal feelings.

• The sequence underscores God’s orderly standard: first establish truth, then act. CompareDeuteronomy 19:18-19, where judges “shall investigate thoroughly” and, if the charge is false, “you must do to him as he intended to do to his brother.”

• Elders were respected heads who met at the city gate (Ruth 4:1-2). Their involvement affirms that justice belongs to the community, not to private revenge.

•Deuteronomy 21:19 shows parents bringing a rebellious son “to the elders of his city at the gate.” The same gate becomes the place of redemptive discipline here.

• Elders symbolize continuity of covenant life.Numbers 35:24-25 calls them to judge homicide cases; here they protect marital purity and a woman’s honor.

• By specifying “that city,” Scripture teaches local responsibility; those closest to the situation must uphold righteousness (cf.Deuteronomy 25:7-9).

• “Take” implies laying hold—no mere reprimand. Truth proven, the accuser loses control of the process.

•Deuteronomy 19:12 uses the same idea when elders “send for him, bring him back…and deliver him.” The community removes the offender from self-rule to face God-ordained consequences.

• Personal status does not shield him.Exodus 23:1-2 warns against following the crowd in wrongdoing; here, even a husband is seized if he lies.

• Verse 19 spells out the penalty: a fine of 100 shekels of silver to the bride’s father and a lifelong ban on divorcing her.

• The fine is restitution for defaming a virgin of Israel—echoingExodus 22:9, where restitution is required for lost property; reputation is treated with at least equal seriousness.

• Discipline is also corrective: the man must keep the wife he slandered, protecting her from future harm.

• False testimony is a covenant violation (Exodus 20:16).Deuteronomy 25:2-3 adds that corporal punishment could accompany fines, keeping the community’s fear of sin alive.

•Leviticus 19:15 commands impartial justice; the elders’ action models it—no favoritism toward the male accuser.

Deuteronomy 22:18 shows God’s unwavering commitment to truth, community responsibility, and protection of the innocent. Once the bride’s purity is vindicated, local elders swiftly seize the deceitful husband and impose tangible, public consequences. The verse teaches that false accusations shatter reputations, offend God, and demand real reparation, ensuring that covenant communities remain places where honor and justice flourish.

Parallel Commentaries ...