Movatterモバイル変換

2 Chronicles 10:16
And when all Israelsaw that the king would not hearken unto them, the people answered the king, saying, What portion have we in David? andwe have none inheritance in the son of Jesse: every man to your tents, O Israel:and now, David, see to thine own house. So all Israel went to their tents.

2 Chronicles 13:5-7
Ought ye not to know that the LORD God of Israel gave the kingdom over Israel to David for ever,even to him and to his sons by a covenant of salt? …

1 Kings 12:19,20
So Israel rebelled against the house of David unto this day…

unto this day

2 Chronicles 5:9
And they drew out the stavesof the ark, that the ends of the staves were seen from the ark before the oracle; but they were not seen without. And there it is unto this day.

Joshua 4:9
And Joshua set up twelve stones in the midst of Jordan, in the place where the feet of the priests which bare the ark of the covenant stood: and they are there unto this day.

Ezra 9:7
Since the days of our fathershave webeen in a great trespass unto this day; and for our iniquities have we, our kings,and our priests, been delivered into the hand of the kings of the lands, to the sword, to captivity, and to a spoil, and to confusion of face, asit is this day.

Israel has been in rebellion
The term "rebellion" refers to the northern tribes' rejection of Rehoboam's rule, leading to the establishment of the separate kingdom of Israel under Jeroboam. This rebellion was not merely political but also spiritual, as it involved the rejection of the Davidic covenant, which promised a ruler from David's line. The rebellion is a fulfillment of the prophecy given to Jeroboam by the prophet Ahijah (1 Kings 11:29-31), indicating divine judgment on Solomon's idolatry and disobedience.

against the house of David
The "house of David" refers to the dynastic line established by God through David, with promises of an everlasting kingdom (2 Samuel 7:12-16). The division of the kingdom represents a significant breach in the unity of the Israelite nation and a challenge to the Davidic covenant. This division foreshadows the eventual coming of Jesus Christ, the ultimate fulfillment of the Davidic promise, who would unite all believers under His eternal reign (Luke 1:32-33). The rebellion against the house of David also serves as a reminder of the consequences of turning away from God's chosen leadership and covenant promises.

- The little word “So” links the events just described to their ongoing consequences. Rehoboam’s harsh answer (2 Chronicles 10:13–14) split the kingdom; the northern tribes walked away (2 Chronicles 10:16).

- Scripture often traces present realities back to prior choices—think of how Saul’s disobedience reshaped his dynasty (1 Samuel 13:13–14) or how David’s sin affected his household (2 Samuel 12:10-12). “So” reminds us that decisions made in one moment ripple forward.

- When the Chronicler wrote, the rupture between north and south was still in place. The phrase appears repeatedly (e.g.,Joshua 4:9;2 Kings 17:34) to underline lasting outcomes.

- It signals that the division was not a temporary spat but a standing condition God allowed as discipline (1 Kings 11:31-33).

- Here “Israel” refers to the ten northern tribes who rejected Rehoboam’s rule (2 Chronicles 10:16-17).

- Though politically separated, they remained God’s covenant people; prophets such as Elijah and Hosea ministered there (1 Kings 18:36;Hosea 1:2).

- The Chronicler’s southern audience is reminded that their estranged brethren still bear the patriarch’s name (Genesis 32:28).

- A continuous verb points to an unbroken state since the schism. The northern kingdom never returned under a Davidic monarch before the exile (2 Kings 17:6-23).

- Generations passed, yet the breach endured—echoing the long-term patterns of blessing or judgment described inLeviticus 26 andDeuteronomy 28.

- The rebellion was political—refusing David’s heir (2 Chronicles 10:19 parallels1 Kings 12:19)—but it also carried spiritual undertones. Rejecting the throne God established (2 Samuel 7:8-16) meant resisting God’s chosen order.

- Jeroboam compounded the revolt by instituting calf worship at Bethel and Dan (1 Kings 12:28-30), drawing the people into idolatry that prophets condemned (Amos 3:14;Hosea 8:5-6).

- God had promised an everlasting dynasty to David (2 Samuel 7:13-16;Psalm 89:3-4). The northern tribes’ stance placed them at odds with that divine covenant line.

- Even so, God preserved a lamp in Jerusalem (1 Kings 11:36). Rehoboam retained Judah and Benjamin, and faithful priests and Levites migrated south (2 Chronicles 11:13-17), ensuring the Messianic promise stayed on course toward Christ (Luke 1:32-33).

2 Chronicles 10:19 captures the enduring fallout of one fateful choice: the ten tribes’ break with David’s heir. That rupture, still present “to this day” for the Chronicler, illustrates how immediate decisions forge long-term realities. Politically, the kingdom divided; spiritually, many drifted from God’s covenant design. Yet the verse also quietly testifies to God’s faithfulness—He safeguarded the house of David so the promised Messiah would come, offering ultimate reconciliation for every rebel heart.

Parallel Commentaries ...