Tulsa Public Schools, Oklahoma
| Tulsa Public Schools |
|---|
| Tulsa, Oklahoma |
| District details |
| Superintendent:Ebony Johnson |
| # of school board members:7 |
| Website:Link |
Tulsa Public Schools is aschool district in Tulsa,Oklahoma.
Click on the links below to learn more about the school district's...
- Superintendent
- School board
- Elections
- Budget
- Teacher salaries
- Academic performance
- Students
- Staff
- Schools
- Contact information
Superintendent
| This information is updated as we become aware of changes. Pleasecontact us with any updates. |
Ebony Johnson is the superintendent of Tulsa Public Schools. Johnson was appointed interim superintendent in September 2023, and full superintendent in December 2023. Johnson's previous career experience includes working as the district's Chief Learning Officer and as an adjunct professor at the University of Oklahoma.[1][2][3]
Past superintendents
- Deborah Gist was the superintendent of Tulsa Public Schools from July 2015 until August 2023.[2] Gist's previous career experience includes working as a senior policy analyst for theUnited States Department of Education, superintendent of theDistrict of Columbia Board of Education, andRhode Island Commissioner of Education.[4]
- Keith Ballard was the superintendent of Tulsa Public Schools from 2008 to 2015. Ballard's previous career experience included working as a teacher, assistant high school principal, and adjunct professor at Oral Roberts University.[5]
School board
The Tulsa Public School school board consists of seven members electedby district to four-year terms.[6]
Elections
Members of the Tulsa Public Schools school board are elected to four-year terms. Either one seat or two seats are up for election each year.
Two seats on the school board were up for general election onApril 1, 2025. A primary was scheduled for February 11, 2025.
Ballotpedia covered school board elections in 367 school districts in 29 states in 2024. Those school districts had a total student enrollment of 12,203,404 students.Click here to read an analysis of those elections.
Join the conversation about school board politics

Public participation in board meetings
The Tulsa Public Schools school board maintains the following policy on public testimony during board meetings:[7]
| “ | Public Comments at School Board Meetings Citizens are encouraged to attend meetings of the Board of Education and are allowed toaddress the Board and to comment as allowed under this policy. Public comment is allowed only at a regular meeting or at a special meeting declared to be apublic hearing for that purpose. Public comment at regular meetings is allowed for twopurposes—to respond to an item on the action agenda or to provide comments regarding topics not on the current agenda (“Citizen Comment”). Speakers’ comments should be shorter than three minutes, but in no event shall a speaker have more than five minutes when providing comment. If an individual is providing comment on an action item and as a Citizen Comment, the time will be counted separately. The board welcomes input from all members of the community and will have translation services available at the board meeting for the purpose of receiving public comment, as needed. If the person providing public comment uses translation services to communicate with the board, up to five additional minutes will be provided to the speaker to ensure the use of translation services does not impair the speaker’s ability to provide their comments. Time will be counted separately if the person is providing both agenda-related comments and Citizen’s Comments. The Board President may interrupt and terminate any presentation not deemed to be inaccordance with the guidelines set out by this policy, for example if the person providingcomments uses profanity or other abusive language against board members, or if the speaker attempts to present comments regarding an issue in a pending lawsuit. The relevant guidelines are described below and outlined on the paper and electronic forms the public completes when signing up to speak. The Board President may also, after a warning, preclude an individual speaker from addressing the Board at that meeting and/or at the next regular meeting of the Board of Education for violation of the guidelines set out by this policy. Public Comment Guidelines School board policies, state law, and federal law establish separate and distinct proceduresand forums for the resolution of employee grievances, employee complaints, employeesuspensions and terminations, complaints against individual employees, pupil suspensionsand appeals, political campaigns, and litigation. To avoid circumvention of these separate proceedings and to assure fairness to all partiesconcerned, no person will be allowed to speak regarding the following:
agency, wherein the District, employee(s) or the Board is a party;
reach the Board.The individual dignity of Board members, District employees, students, and membersof thepublic must be respected by all speakers. Board members, employees, students, ormembers of the public will not be subjected to verbal abuse. Comments Concerning Items on the Action Agenda All public comment regarding matters on the action agenda shall be received together as aseparate item on the agenda prior to the consideration of the action agenda. Requests tocomment must be made by submitting a completed form for that purpose. Paper forms areavailable from the Board Clerk before the beginning of each meeting and will be acceptedup to 6:25 pm on the day of the meeting. Electronic forms will be available online and shallbe submitted after the relevant agenda has posted and no later than noon on the day of themeeting. Each individual requesting to speak must personally complete the form listing theirname and contact information and verify they have read the instructions regardingcomments. The individual will also indicate on the form if they are speaking on their ownbehalf or on behalf of a group and whether or not they support or oppose the item (asapplicable). Speakers are encouraged to provide the Board with a written outline of theircomments to be made available to them before or at the meeting. The total time limit will apply to each speaker regardless of the number of agenda items towhich they wish to speak The Board and staff will not dialogue with speakers. When determined to be appropriateby the Superintendent, staff will strive to provide answers or resolve any issues/concernsin a timely manner. “Citizen’s Comments”—Comments Concerning Items Not on an Agenda The agenda for the regularly scheduled meetings of the Board will include an item designated “Citizens’ Comments.” This portion of the agenda will be reserved for commentsconcerning issues not otherwise appearing on an agenda to provide citizens an opportunityto address the Board of Education, and it is not intended to provide a forum for commercial,political, personal or similar topics. An individual wishing to comment during this portion of a meeting must personally sign andsubmit a completed request form with all supporting documents to the Clerk of the Boardseven calendar days before the meeting at which the individual wishes to speak. The formsare available online or from the Clerk of the Board of Education. Each individual requestingto speak must complete the form and verify they have read instructions. Generic topics will not be accepted. The topic listed on the request form must be brief butspecific enough to satisfy posting requirements under state law. The topic should be wordedso an ordinary individual would understand what the topic is about. The topic languagesubmitted by the citizen will be reviewed and approved or disapproved by the attorney forthe School District. Individuals will also indicate on the form if they are speaking on theirown behalf or on behalf of a group. Speakers will be notified regarding approval ordisapproval of their request. The Superintendent or designee will address speakers'specific issues or concerns within 60 days. The total time limit of Citizens’ Comments will apply to each speaker during a meetingregardless of the number of topics on which the individual requests to speak. Speakers arewelcomed and encouraged to provide the Board with a written outline of their comments to be made available to them before or at the meeting.[8] | ” |
School board meetings
The following articles were produced byCitizen Portal using artificial intelligence to analyze public meetings. Citizen Portal publishes articles based on the availability of meeting broadcasts, so the number of articles provided may vary by district. Although these articles are not produced or edited by Ballotpedia, they are included here as a supplemental resource for readers.
District map
Budget
The following statistics were published by theNational Center for Education Statistics, which is a part of theU.S. Department of Education.[9]
| SOURCE | AMOUNT | AMOUNT PER STUDENT | PERCENT |
|---|---|---|---|
| Federal: | $136,809,000 | $4,119 | 27% |
| Local: | $217,632,000 | $6,553 | 43% |
| State: | $150,980,000 | $4,546 | 30% |
| Total: | $505,421,000 | $15,218 |
| TYPE | AMOUNT | AMOUNT PER STUDENT | PERCENT |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Expenditures: | $498,652,000 | $15,014 | |
| Total Current Expenditures: | $404,452,000 | $12,178 | |
| Instructional Expenditures: | $198,653,000 | $5,981 | 40% |
| Student and Staff Support: | $66,570,000 | $2,004 | 13% |
| Administration: | $60,291,000 | $1,815 | 12% |
| Operations, Food Service, Other: | $78,938,000 | $2,376 | 16% |
| Total Capital Outlay: | $85,556,000 | $2,576 | |
| Construction: | $78,254,000 | $2,356 | |
| Total Non El-Sec Education & Other: | $3,978,000 | $119 | |
| Interest on Debt: | $4,666,000 | $140 |
Teacher salaries
The following salary information was pulled from the district's teacher salary schedule. A salary schedule is a list of expected compensations based on variables such as position, years employed, and education level. It may not reflect actual teacher salaries in the district.
| Year | Minimum | Maximum |
|---|---|---|
| 2024-2025[10] | $43,500 | $82,548 |
| 2022-2023[11] | $40,000 | $68,886 |
| 2020[12] | $40,000 | $68,886 |
| 2019 | $40,000 | $68,886 |
Academic performance
Each year, state and local education agencies use tests and other standards to assess student proficiency. Although the data below was published by theU.S. Department of Education, proficiency measurements are established by the states. As a result,proficiency levels are not comparable between different states andyear-over-year proficiency levels within a district may not be comparable because states may change their proficiency measurements.[13]
The following table shows the percentage of district students who scored at or above the proficiency level each school year:
| School year | All (%) | Asian/Pacific Islander (%) | Black (%) | Hispanic (%) | Native American (%) | Two or More Races (%) | White (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-2021 | 7 | 14 | 2 | 4 | 9 | 10 | 17 |
| 2018-2019 | 16 | 23 | 7 | 11 | 17 | 18 | 30 |
| 2017-2018 | 16 | 30 | 7 | 11 | 16 | 19 | 30 |
| 2016-2017 | 19 | 35 | 9 | 14 | 19 | 22 | 33 |
| 2015-2016 | 45 | 61 | 30 | 42 | 45 | 49 | 61 |
| 2014-2015 | 43 | 57 | 30 | 39 | 46 | 46 | 59 |
| 2013-2014 | 42 | 60-64 | 31 | 38 | 43 | 45 | 57 |
| 2012-2013 | 52 | 70-74 | 41 | 48 | 53 | 55 | 68 |
| 2011-2012 | 52 | 75 | 39 | 46 | 53 | 55 | 68 |
| 2010-2011 | 55 | 70 | 43 | 52 | 54 | 67 |
The following table shows the percentage of district students who scored at or above the proficiency level each school year:
| School year | All (%) | Asian/Pacific Islander (%) | Black (%) | Hispanic (%) | Native American (%) | Two or More Races (%) | White (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-2021 | 12 | 16 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 16 | 25 |
| 2018-2019 | 19 | 23 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 24 | 36 |
| 2017-2018 | 21 | 29 | 11 | 14 | 20 | 25 | 38 |
| 2016-2017 | 23 | 31 | 12 | 15 | 25 | 27 | 41 |
| 2015-2016 | 53 | 60 | 39 | 47 | 57 | 60 | 69 |
| 2014-2015 | 52 | 62 | 41 | 44 | 56 | 57 | 69 |
| 2013-2014 | 51 | 60-64 | 38 | 42 | 55 | 57 | 68 |
| 2012-2013 | 54 | 65-69 | 43 | 46 | 57 | 56 | 71 |
| 2011-2012 | 53 | 65 | 42 | 42 | 57 | 57 | 70 |
| 2010-2011 | 55 | 61 | 45 | 47 | 59 | 70 |
The following table shows the graduation rate of district students each school year:
| School year | All (%) | Asian/Pacific Islander (%) | Black (%) | Hispanic (%) | Native American (%) | Two or More Races (%) | White (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-2020 | 71 | 70-79 | 72 | 74 | 55-59 | 65-69 | 70 |
| 2018-2019 | 78 | >=90 | 77 | 78 | 70-74 | 75-79 | 82 |
| 2017-2018 | 75 | 80-89 | 75 | 75 | 65-69 | 70-74 | 77 |
| 2016-2017 | 77 | >=90 | 79 | 75 | 70-74 | 75-79 | 79 |
| 2015-2016 | 73 | 80-89 | 76 | 70 | 60-64 | 70-74 | 72 |
| 2014-2015 | 68 | 80-89 | 67 | 65 | 60-64 | 60-64 | 72 |
| 2013-2014 | 63 | 80-89 | 61 | 62 | 55-59 | 55-59 | 66 |
| 2012-2013 | 65 | 80-89 | 62 | 60 | 60-64 | 55-59 | 71 |
Students
| Year | Enrollment | Year-to-year change (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 2023-2024 | 33,562 | -0.9 |
| 2022-2023 | 33,871 | 1.9 |
| 2021-2022 | 33,211 | 1.9 |
| 2020-2021 | 32,569 | -9.5 |
| 2019-2020 | 35,675 | -2.3 |
| 2018-2019 | 36,512 | -2.5 |
| 2017-2018 | 37,433 | -3.2 |
| 2016-2017 | 38,625 | -2.1 |
| 2015-2016 | 39,455 | -1.4 |
| 2014-2015 | 39,999 | -0.4 |
| 2013-2014 | 40,152 | -2.3 |
| 2012-2013 | 41,076 | -0.3 |
| 2011-2012 | 41,199 | -0.7 |
| 2010-2011 | 41,501 | 0.0 |
| 2009-2010 | 41,493 | 0.7 |
| 2008-2009 | 41,195 | -0.2 |
| 2007-2008 | 41,271 | -0.4 |
| 2006-2007 | 41,438 | -0.3 |
| 2005-2006 | 41,568 | -0.1 |
| 2004-2005 | 41,629 | -1.6 |
| 2003-2004 | 42,280 | -1.8 |
| 2002-2003 | 43,029 | 1.7 |
| 2001-2002 | 42,302 | -1.2 |
| 2000-2001 | 42,812 | 0.0 |
| 1999-2000 | 42,793 | 0.0 |
| RACE | Tulsa Public Schools (%) | Oklahoma K-12 STUDENTS (%) |
|---|---|---|
| American Indian/Alaska Native | 4.3 | 10.9 |
| Asian or Asian/Pacific Islander | 2.0 | 2.3 |
| Black | 22.4 | 7.8 |
| Hispanic | 38.0 | 20.5 |
| Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander | 1.5 | 0.5 |
| Two or More Races | 10.9 | 13.5 |
| White | 20.9 | 44.5 |
Note: Percentages for race and ethnicity may add up to more than 100 percent because respondents may report more than one race and the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity may be selected in conjunction with any race. Read more about race and ethnicity in the censushere.
Staff
As of the 2023-2024 school year, Tulsa Public Schools had 1,819.62 full-time classroom teachers. The student-teacher ratio was 18.44.
| TYPE | NUMBER OF TEACHERS |
|---|---|
| Prekindergarten: | 91.63 |
| Kindergarten: | 102.36 |
| Elementary: | 842.47 |
| Secondary: | 783.16 |
| Total: | 1,819.62 |
Tulsa Public Schools employed 87.86 district administrators and 122.82 school administrators as of the 2023-2024 school year.
| TYPE | NUMBER OF ADMINISTRATORS |
|---|---|
| District Administrators: | 87.86 |
| District Administrative Support: | 185.69 |
| School Administrators: | 122.82 |
| School Administrative Support: | 227.28 |
| TYPE | NUMBER OF OTHER STAFF |
|---|---|
| Instructional Aides: | 583.67 |
| Instruc. Coordinators & Supervisors: | 36.43 |
| Total Guidance Counselors: | 86.11 |
| Elementary Guidance Counselors: | 35.06 |
| Secondary Guidance Counselors: | 51.05 |
| Librarians/Media Specialists: | 59.77 |
| Library/Media Support: | 0.00 |
| Student Support Services: | 451.48 |
| Other Support Services: | 1,036.29 |
Schools
| SCHOOL NAME | NUMBER OF STUDENTS | GRADES |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson Es | 347 | PK-5 |
| Bell Es | 360 | PK-5 |
| Booker T. Washington Hs | 1,285 | 9-12 |
| Burroughs Es | 301 | PK-5 |
| Carnegie Es | 394 | PK-5 |
| Carver Ms | 658 | 6-8 |
| Celia Clinton Es | 542 | PK-5 |
| Central Hs | 378 | 9-12 |
| Central Ms | 309 | 6-8 |
| Clinton West Es | 347 | PK-5 |
| Cooper Es | 509 | PK-5 |
| Council Oak Es | 509 | PK-5 |
| Daniel Webster Hs | 380 | 9-12 |
| Daniel Webster Ms | 342 | 6-8 |
| Disney Es | 673 | PK-5 |
| Dolores Huerta Es | 311 | PK-5 |
| East Central Hs | 1,189 | 9-12 |
| East Central Middle School | 908 | 6-8 |
| Edison Preparatory Ms | 803 | 6-8 |
| Eisenhower International Es | 536 | PK-5 |
| Eliot Es | 360 | PK-5 |
| Emerson Es | 393 | PK-5 |
| Eugene Field Es | 317 | PK-5 |
| Felicitas Mendez Intl School | 296 | PK-5 |
| Greenwood Leadership Academy | 283 | PK-5 |
| Grissom Es | 345 | PK-6 |
| Hamilton Es | 297 | PK-5 |
| Hawthorne Es | 353 | PK-5 |
| Henry Zarrow International Sch | 478 | PK-5 |
| Hoover Es | 338 | PK-5 |
| John Hope Franklin Es | 343 | PK-5 |
| Kendall-Whittier Es | 817 | PK-5 |
| Kerr Es | 348 | PK-5 |
| Key Es | 302 | PK-5 |
| Lanier Es | 310 | PK-5 |
| Lewis And Clark Es | 423 | PK-5 |
| Lindbergh Es | 460 | PK-5 |
| Macarthur Es | 387 | PK-5 |
| Marshall Es | 263 | PK-5 |
| Mayo Demonstration Es | 400 | PK-5 |
| Mcclure Es | 363 | PK-5 |
| Mckinley Es | 425 | PK-5 |
| Mclain Hs For Science And Tech | 726 | 9-12 |
| Memorial Hs | 1,023 | 9-12 |
| Memorial Ms | 568 | 6-8 |
| Mitchell Es | 382 | PK-5 |
| Monroe Demonstration Ms | 620 | 6-8 |
| Nathan Hale Hs | 1,067 | 9-12 |
| Nathan Hale Middle School | 791 | 6-8 |
| Owen Es | 385 | PK-5 |
| Patrick Henry Es | 429 | PK-5 |
| Peary Es | 268 | PK-5 |
| Project Accept Traice Es | 469 | PK-6 |
| Robertson Es | 235 | PK-5 |
| Salk Es | 462 | PK-5 |
| Sequoyah Es | 369 | PK-5 |
| Skelly Es | 747 | PK-5 |
| Springdale Es | 366 | PK-5 |
| Thomas Edison Preparatory Hs | 1,089 | 9-12 |
| Thoreau Demonstration Academy | 439 | 6-8 |
| Traice | 827 | 9-12 |
| Traice Ms | 193 | 6-8 |
| Tulsa Met Hs | 94 | 9-12 |
| Tulsa Met Middle School | 52 | 6-8 |
| Unity Learning Academy | 271 | PK-5 |
| Wayman Tisdale Fine Arts Acad | 362 | PK-5 |
| Whitman Es | 257 | PK-5 |
| Will Rogers College Hs | 1,037 | 9-12 |
| Will Rogers College Ms | 652 | 6-8 |
Noteworthy events
2015: Testing reduction
In August 2015,Superintendent Gist announced a 54% reduction in time spent on district-required testing at Tulsa Public Schools. The district had formed an assessment study group that met five times in January 2015 to discuss the rate of testing in the district; Gist attended two of those meetings. The implemented changes sought to "curb over-testing by reducing the frequency of some tests, eliminating one entirely, and by removing the district requirement to implement others." Gist said about the testing reductions, "These decisions were really based on that careful analysis to say where are the places where this information already gathered in another way."[14][15][16]
2013: Overcrowding
Tulsa Public Schools has addressed overcrowding in many of its schools. Due to an efficiency initiative known as Project Schoolhouse, the school district shut down 14 school buildings with low enrollment in 2011. These closures left many schools operating at higher occupancy rates. District leaders said they needed to pay close attention to ensure that schools didn't cross the line between full and overcapacity. Each winter since Project Schoolhouse began, district administrators have conducted an annual site capacity review and the Tulsa school board has subsequently approved adjustments to school boundaries to help balance out student enrollments among sites. In 2013, Tulsa Public Schools reopened a closed elementary school building as a 7th-grade center to help alleviate unexpected crowding at McLain Junior High School. Former Superintendent Keith Ballard believed that Project Schoolhouse was working and that the district could have been eligible to pursue a new bond issue to address capital needs, including classroom additions, in late 2014 or early 2015.[17]
Contact information
![]()
Tulsa Public Schools
3027 S. New Haven Ave.
Tulsa, OK 74114-6131
Phone: 918-746-6800
About school boards
Education legislation in Oklahoma
Bills are monitored byBillTrack50 and sorted by action history.
See also
| Oklahoma | School Board Elections | News and Analysis |
|---|---|---|
External links
- Search Google News for this topic
- Tulsa Public Schools
- Oklahoma State School Boards Association
- Oklahoma State Department of Education
Footnotes
- ↑Tulsa Public Schools, "Leadership Team," accessed November 1, 2019
- ↑2.02.1KUTL, "'A dream and an honor': Dr. Ebony Johnson steps into new role as Tulsa interim superintendent," September 17, 2023
- ↑News on 6, "TULSA SCHOOL BOARD APPROVES DR. EBONY JOHNSON AS SUPERINTENDENT; WALTERS RESPONDS," December 12, 2023
- ↑Tulsa Public Schools, "Leadership Team," accessed November 1, 2019
- ↑Tulsa Public Schools, "Supt. Biography," accessed January 19, 2014
- ↑Tulsa Public Schools, "School Board Policy Manual," accessed April 5, 2021
- ↑Tulsa Public Schools, "School Board Policy Manual," accessed April 24, 2025
- ↑Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑National Center for Education Statistics, "Elementary/Secondary Information System," accessed October 6, 2025
- ↑Tulsa Public Schools, "2024-2025 SALARY SCHEDULE TEACHERS," accessed April 24, 2025
- ↑Oklahoma State Department of Education, "Local Salary Schedules (2022-2023)," accessed January 31,2024
- ↑Tulsa Public Schools, "2019-2020 Salary Schedule - Teachers," accessed April 5, 2021
- ↑U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC: EDFacts, "State Assessments in Reading/Language Arts and Mathematics- School Year 2018-19 EDFacts Data Documentation," accessed February 25, 2021
- ↑Tulsa World, "Tulsa Public Schools says district-mandated testing time to be reduced by 54 percent," August 4, 2015
- ↑Tulsa's Channel 8 KTUL, "Reduction in Testing Means More Control for Teachers," August 4, 2015
- ↑Public Radio Tulsa, "Testing to be Trimmed in TPS," August 4, 2015
- ↑Tulsa World, "Tulsa Public Schools considering options to alleviate crowding," December 30, 2013
| |||||